MANAJEMEN SARANA PRASARANA DALAM MENINGKATKAN PROSES PEMBELAJARAN

Authors

  • Aditya Nugraha Universitas Islam Nusantara Bandung
  • Happy Fitria Universitas PGRI Palembang

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the completeness of the infrastructure, the management of infrastructure and the efforts made by Palembang State Senior High School in improving the learning process. In this study the research data used a type of qualitative research, in this study the data was used using analysis gaps that helped Palembang State High School 9 in revealing which ones should be improved in improving infrastructure at Palembang State High School 9. Gap analysis includes determination, documentation, and the positive side of diversity of desires and capabilities now. The results of the gap analysis show that 14 items have not met the standards contained in Permen No. 24 of 2007, facilities that do not meet the standards include: Classrooms, library rooms, biological laboratory rooms, physics laboratory rooms, chemical laboratory rooms, computer laboratory rooms, spaces language laboratory, teacher's room, UKS room, student organization room, toilet, warehouse, circulation room, and sports equipment room. Whereas facilities that are in accordance with the standards contained in Permen No. 24 of 2007 are only 4 items including: leadership room, administration room, worship room, and counseling room. The principal as the school leader has implemented an administrative function to fix the existing infrastructure in the school starting from the functions of planning, coordinating, channeling, to accountability, by setting these functions expected to optimize infrastructure in improving the learning process at Palembang 9 Public High School.

References

Arikunto, S. (2013).Prosedur Penelitian suatu pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta.Rineka Cipta.

Asiabaka.2008.The Need for Effective Facility Management in Schools in Nigeria. New York Science Journal.Vol 1 No 1. Pg: 10-21.

Barnawi & Arifin, M. (2012)Manajemen Sarana dan Prasarana Sekolah. Jogjakarta: Ar- Ruzz Media.

Burhan, B. (2007).Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Public, dan Ilmu Social Lainnya, Jakarta : Kencana.

Endang, M. (2004).Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah: Konsep, Strategi dan Implementasi, Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakary.

Hanushek.(2005). The Economics of School Quality.German Economic Journal. 6(3): 269–286.

Ibrahim, B. (2004).Manajemen Perlengkapan Sekolah : Teori dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Ifeoma.(2012).Assessing School Facilities in Public Secondary Schools in Delta State, Nigeria.An International Multidisciplinary Journal.Vol 6 No 2. Pg: 192-205.

Kafarisa, R. F., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). Kelas Komunitas Menunjang Terciptanya Karakter Komunikatif Peserta Didik Homeschooling Palembang. JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan), 3(1).

Lian, B., Kristiawan, M., & Fitriya, R. (2018). Giving Creativity Room To Students Through The Friendly School’s Program. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(7).

Lunenburg.(2010). School Fasilities Management.National Forum Of Educational Administration & Supervision Journal. Volume 27, Number 4. Pg: 1-7.

Lexy, J. M. (2012).Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif , Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

McDonald. (2010).Contested Visions of the Community School.Journal of the American Planning Association.Vol 76 No 2. Pg: 184-198.

Prawirokusumo, S. (2000).Manajemen Strategik. Andi, Yogyakarta.

Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.

Sri, M. (2011).Manajemen Sekolah:Mengelola Lembaga Pendidikan Secara Mandiri, Yogyakarta:Ar-Ruzz Media.

Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Downloads

Published

2019-02-22