RESISTENSI GURU MENGAJAR DI DAERAH TERPENCIL
Abstract
These studies emphasize the motivation of teachers to survive teaching in remote areas and their roles, with a focus on research into factors that can make teachers survive teaching. The purpose of this study was to determine the motivation of teachers to survive teaching in remote areas and its role in Elementary School 23 Pulau Rimau Purwodadi Village P.13 KAT Pulau Rimau District Banyuasin District with the main data sources were 4 teachers as informants. This research is qualitative, with a case study approach. While the technique of collecting data through interviews, observation, and documentation studies. The data analysis technique in this study is through drawing conclusions. The results of this study are the motivational factors of the surviving teacher, namely; (1) a sense of responsibility for the education of children in remote areas; (2) the teacher enjoys work as a noble proposition; (3) the teacher receives good appreciation from the local community; (4) a conducive environment; (5) moral encouragement from the principal. By knowing and being aware of the role as educators, teachers at 23 Pulau Rimau Elementary Schools can sincerely serve and carry out their duties well.References
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Djamarah, S. B. (2006). Guru dan Anak Didik dalam Interaksi Edukatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Guba, E. G., & S., Y. (1981). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: ANDI.
Kristiawan, M., Safitri, D., & Lestari, R. (2017). Manajemen Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Kristiawan, M., Suryanti, I., Muntazir, M., Ribuwati, Areli, A. J., Agustina, M., et al. (2017). Inovasi Pendidikan. Ponorogo: Wade Group.
Mangkunegara, A. P. (2005). Evaluasi Kinerja Sumber Daya Manusia . Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Mangkunegara, A. P. (2011). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan . Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Manullang, M. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Moleong, L. J. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif . Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nata, A. (2016). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Surakarta: Kencana.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 57 tahun 2005 tentang Desa.
Prawirosentono, S. (1999). Kebijakan Kinerja Karyawan. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Purwanto. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Purwanto, S. E., Mashudi, & utomo, B. B. (2012). Analisis Motivasi Instrinsik dan Ekstrinsik Guru Ekonomi SMAN 1 Mempawah Hulu Kabupaten Landak.FKIP Untan.
Ranupandojo, H., & Husnan, S. (1990). Manajemen Personalia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
Sardiman. (2007). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sudijono, A. (2010). Pengantar Statistik Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supardi. (2013). Sekolah Efektif: Konsep Dasar dan Prakteknya. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Undang-Undang Republik Indoneia No. 14 tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.
Uno, H. B., & Lamatenggo, N. (2012). Teori Kinerja dan Pengukuranya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Usman, H. (2010). Manajemen: Teori, Praktik & Riset Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Usman, M. U. (2017). Menjadi Guru profesional. Bandung: Rosdakarya.
Wahyudi, I. (2012). Mengejar Profesional Guru. Strategi Praktis Mewujudkan Citra Guru Profesional . Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.
Walgito. (2002). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: ANDI.
Winkel, W. S. (1996). Psikologi Pengajaran. Jakarta: Grasindo.
