IMPROVING HEADMASTERS’ PERFORMANCE: DOES SCHOOL CULTURE MATTER?

Authors

  • Nuphanudin Nuphanudin Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Aan Komariah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Dedy Achmad Kurniady Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  • Anggita Bayu Putri Anggraini Wasana Praja, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Jatinangor
  • Edo Djati Santoso Nindya Praja, Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri, Waena, Distrik Heram, Papua

Abstract

Abstrak

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menggambarkan sepotong informasi mendalam tentang budaya sekolah pada kinerja kepala sekolah. Penelitian dilaksanakan di Kota Bandung pada bulan Oktober 2020-Januari 2021 dengan menggunakan metode survei dengan analisis jalur diterapkan dalam pengujian hipotesis. Ada 13 Kepala Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Negeri di Kota Bandung sebagai sampel yang dipilih secara acak. Temuannya adalah: terdapat pengaruh langsung budaya sekolah terhadap kinerja kepala sekolah. Maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa setiap perubahan atau variasi yang terjadi pada kinerja kepala sekolah mungkin secara langsung mempengaruhi budaya sekolah. Sedangkan jika ingin meminimalkan variasi yang terjadi pada kinerja kepala sekolah, faktor-faktor seperti budaya sekolah perlu diperhatikan.

 

Kata kunci: pendidikan vokasi, manajemen perubahan, kendali desentralisasi, Bandung

Abstract

The aim of this study is to portray a piece of in-depth information concerning the school culture on headmasters’ performance. It was conducted in Kota Bandung on October 2020-January 2021 by using a survey method with path analysis applied in the testing hypothesis. There were 13 State Vocational High School Headmasters in Kota Bandung as samples selected randomly. The findings are: there is a direct effect of school culture toward headmasters’ performance. Then, it could be concluded that any change or variation that occurred at headmasters’ performance might have been directly effecting by school culture. While, if we want to minimize the variation which occurred in headmasters’ performance, these factors such as school culture are necessary to be taken into account.

 Keywords: vocational education, change management, decentralized control, Bandung

References

Ahmad, S., Azman, N., & Bowyer, D. (2020). Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership and Technology Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda. Journal of International Business and Management, 3(4), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.37227/jibm-2020-04-44

Andriani, S., Kesumawati, N., & Kristiawan, M. (2018). The influence of the transformational leadership and work motivation on teachers performance. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 7(7), 19–29.

Arar, K., & Abu-Romi, A. (2016). School-based management: Arab education system in Israel. Journal of Educational Administration, 54(2), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-09-2014-0118

Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2017). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Company, Inc.

Daft, R. L. (2015). The Leadership Experience. Cengage Learning (Sixth). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324004

Delai, I., & Takahashi, S. (2011). Sustainability measurement system: A reference model proposal. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 438–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111111154563

DuBrin, A. J. (1978). Fundamentals of organizational behavior: An applied perspective (2nd ed.). Rochester: Pergamon. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2013-0-02966-0

Ganimian, A. J. (2016). Why do some school-based management reforms survive while others are reversed? The cases of Honduras and Guatemala. International Journal of Educational Development, 47, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.12.001

Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly, J. H., & Kanopaske, R. (2012). Organizations: Behavior, Structure, Processes (14th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Company, Inc.

Hale, J. (2003). Performance-based management: What every manager should do to get results (1st ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Hale, J., & Gilmore, E. R. (2005). Performance-based management: What every manager should do to get results. Performance Improvement, 44(10), 45–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140441010

Hwang, G., Lee, J., Park, J., & Chang, T. W. (2017). Developing performance measurement system for Internet of Things and smart factory environment. International Journal of Production Research, 55(9), 2590–2602. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1245883

Kinicki, A., & Kreitner, R. (2018). Organizational behavior: Key concepts, skills & best practices (2nd ed.). Columbus, Ohio: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Lee, D. H. L., & Chiu, C. S. (2017). “School bandingâ€: Principals’ perspectives of teacher professional development in the school-based management context. Journal of Educational Administration, 55(6), 686–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2017-0018

McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. A. Y. (2011). Organizational behavior: Emerging knowledge and practice for the real world. McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Nelson, D. L., & Quick, J. C. (2013). Organizational behavior: Science, the real world, and you. USA: Cengage Learning.

Pawirosumarto, S., Sarjana, P. K., & Muchtar,

M. (2017). Factors affecting employee performance of PT. Kiyokuni Indonesia. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(4), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-03-2016-0031

Robbins, S., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior (15th ed.). USA: Pearson Educational Inc.

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture & leadership (4th ed.). USA: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Company.

Slocum Jr., J. W., & Hellriegel, D. (2011). Principles of Organizational Behavior. Canada: Nelson Education, Ltd.

Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: A new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.518

Suciningtyas, R. (2019). Leadership of school headmaster in improving the quality of education. In Proceeding the 3rd International Conference on Education Innovation (ICEI 2019) (pp. 59–61). Surabaya: Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Wang, Z., & Sarkis, J. (2017). Corporate social responsibility governance, outcomes, and financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1607–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.142

Zapata-phelan, C. P., Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., & Livingston, B. (2009). Procedural justice, interactional justice, and task performance: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.08.001

Downloads

Published

2021-04-20