PENDESAINAN PEMBELAJARAN PEMODELAN MATEMATIKA UNTUK PEMBELAJARAN BERKUALITAS PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID-19

Authors

  • Bambang Riyanto SMK Negeri 1 Sungai Menang

Abstract

Pembelajaran tradisional yang diterapkan selama ini tidak mampu membuat pembelajaran berkualitas. Tujuan Penelitian adalah menghasilkan soal/masalah pemodelan matematika yang valid untuk pembelajaran matematika berkualitas pada masa pandemi covid-19. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian pengembangan. Penelitian ini terdiri dari 3 tahap, yaitu analisis, desain dan evaluasi. Langkah analisis dilakukan analisis siswa, kurikulum, kebutuhan vokasional, konteks yang dibutuhkan dan pemodelan matematika. Langkah kedua adalah desain dan produk. Langkah terakhir adalah desain evaluasi formatif yang terdiri dari evaluasi diri, one-to-one, experts review, small group, dan field test. Penelitian telah menghasil soal pemodelan matematika yang valid untuk pembelajaran matematika berkualitas di masa pandemi covid-19. Hasil penelitian ini menyarankan bahwa penting bagi guru untuk mendesain dan mengimplementasikan pembelajaran dan penelitian pemodelan matematika. Rekomendasi penelitian ini adalah perlu dilakukan pembelajaran dan penelitian pembelajaran pemodelan di masa pandemi-covid-19 dan ke depan setelah pandemi covid-19.


Kata kunci: Pendesainan, pembelajaran pemodelan, pembelajaran berkualitas.

References

Bellingan, C. N. M., Buan, A. T., Calang, M. K. A., & Gabuya, R. C. (2018). Development of activities integrating phet interactive simulation for teaching linear equation. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324476483

Biccard, P., & Wessels, D. (2015). Student mathematical activity as a springboard to developing teacher didactisation practices. Pythagoras, 36(2), 1-9. http://dx.doi. org/10.4102/pythagoras. v36i2.294.

Blum, W., Artigue, M., Mariotti, M. A., Sträßer, R., Heuvel-Panhuizen, M.V.D. (2019). European Didactic Traditionsin Mathematics: Introduction and Overview. In: Blum, W., Artigue, M., Mariotti, M.A., Sträßer, R., & Heuvel-Panhuizen, M.V.D. European Traditions in Didactics of Mathematics. Switzerland: Springer.

Boaler, J., Lamar, T., Langer-Osuna, J., Suurtamm, C., & Adams, J. (2021). We’re in this together: Supporting high-quality math teaching in uncertain times. USA: Knowledgehook.

Corrêa, P.D. (2021). The Mathematical Proficiency Promoted by Mathematical Modelling. Journal of Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 4(2), 107-131. DOI: 10.31756/jrsmte.424

Diego-Mantecón, J.M., Haro, E., Blanco, T.F., & Romo-Vázquez, A. (2021). The chimera of the competency-based approach to teaching mathematics: a study of carpentry purchases for home projects. Educational Studies in Mathematics https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10032-5.

Flevares, L.M., & Schiff, J.R. (2013). Engaging young learners in integration through mathematical modeling: asking big questions, finding answers, and doing big thinking. Advances in Early Education and Day Care, 17(1), 33-56.

Flores, A. (2007). Examining disparities in mathematics education: Achievement gap or opportunity gap? High Sch. J., 91, 29–42.

Haas, B. (2021). Transition from in-Class to Outdoor Learning with Real-World Mathematical Modelling. Dissertation Doctoral. Luxembourg: Johannes Kepler Universität Linz.

Knott, L., Olson, J., Adams, A., & Ely, R. (2013). Task Design: Supporting Teacher to Indepedently Create Rich Task. In: Margolinas, C. (Ed.). Task Design in Mathematics Education Proceedings of The International Commission on Mathematics Instruction Study 2. Retrieved 3 Maret 2019 from http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00834054

Lave, J., & Gomes, A. (2019). Learning and everyday life: Access, participation, and changing practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616416.

Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511609268

Maa®, J., O’Meara, N., Johnson, P., & O’Donoghue, J. (2018). Mathematical Modelling for Teacher: A Practical Guide to Applicable Mathematics Education. Switzerland: Springer.

Nusantara, D.S., Zulkardi, & Putri, R.I.I. (2021). Designing PISA-like Mathematics Task Using A COVID-19 Context (PISAComat). Journal on Mathematics Education, 12(2), 349-364. http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.12.2.13181.349-364

OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-9-en

Riyanto, B. (2020). Pendesainan Pembelajaran Pemodelan Matematika Sekolah Menengah Atas. Disertasi. Palembang: Universitas Sriwijaya.

Riyanto, B. (2020). Pembelajaran Pemodelan Matematika Sekolah. Palembang: Unsri Press.

Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Darmawijoyo. (2019). Senior high school mathematics learning through mathematics modeling approach. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(3), 425 – 444.

Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Darmawijoyo. (2019). HOTS on mathematical modelling approach in primary school. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1188(012088) doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012088.

Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Darmawijoyo. (2019). Learning mathematics through modeling tasks in elementary school: using growth of population context. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1166 (2019) 012033 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1166/1/012033

Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Darmawijoyo. (2019). Learning mathematics through mathematical modeling approach using jembatan musi 2 context. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1315 (2019) 012008 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012008

Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Darmawijoyo. (2018). Mathematical Learning through Modeling Task in Senior High School: Using Nutrition Context. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1097(012102) doi :10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012102

Riyanto, B., Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., Darmawijoyo. (2017). Mathematical modeling in realistic mathematics education. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 943(012049) doi :10.1088/1742-6596/943/1/012049.

Sullivan, P., Knott, L., & Yang, Y. (2015). The relationships between tasks design, anticipated pedagogies, and student learning. In: Watson, A., Ohtani, M. Task Design in Mathematics Education. Oxford: Springer.

Tessmer, M. (1993). Planning and Conducting Formative Evaluation. Philadelphia: Kogan Page.

Wijaya, A. (2015). Context-based mathematics tasks in Indonesia: Toward better practice and achievement. Unpublish Doctoral Dissertation. Utrecht: Utrecht University.

Zhang, Q., & Seah, W. T. (2021). Thematic Issue on Values and Valuing in Mathematics Education: Revisiting Mathematics Education from Cultural Perspectives. ECNU Review of Education, 1 – 5. DOI: 10.1177/20965311211011628.

Zulkardi, & Putri, R.I.I. (2019). New School Mathematics Curricula, PISA and PMRI in Indonesia. In: Vistro-Yu, C.P., & Toh, T.L. (eds.). School Mathematics Curricula, Mathematics Education – An Asian Perspective. Singapore: Springer.

Zulkardi. (2017). Pembelajaran Pemodelan Matematika. Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (SNMPM). Palembang: Universitas Sriwijaya.

Zulkardi. (2013). Designing Joyful and Meaningful New School Mathematics Using Indonesian Realistic Mathematics Education. Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal, 3 (1), 17 – 25.

Zulkardi. (2006). Formative Evaluation: What, Why, When, and How. Retrieved Nopember 2016, from http://reocities.com/zulkardi/books.html

Zulkardi. (2002). Developing a Learning Environment on Realistic Mathematics Education for Indonesian Student Teachers. Unpublish Doctoral Dissertation. Enschede: University of Twente.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-16