Effect of Training Variations on Tennis Groundstroke Forehand Ability for Beginner Tennis

Authors

  • Mario Febrian Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Andre Igoresky Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Indri Wulandari Universitas Negeri Padang
  • Diah Fauzi Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31851/hon.v9i1.21557

Abstract

Forehand is the most basic and easiest stroke to teach in tennis. This study investigated the effect of variations in forehand training on the forehand groundstroke ability of beginner tennis athletes in padang. The sample was taken from beginner tennis athletes in padang, grouped according to their forehand groundstroke ability. Each group received forehand groundstroke training with different variations: fixed position and shifting position The results showed a significant effect of variations in forehand groundstroke training on forehand groundstroke ability in tennis. This was demonstrated by the t-test results, where t-test (9.237) > t-table (2.457). The t-test results revealed an effect of variations in forehand groundstroke training on the initial ability of beginner tennis athletes in padang. However, the study found that variations in forehand groundstroke training with fixed position were more effective than variations in shifting position on forehand groundstroke ability in tennis for beginner tennis athletes in padang.

References

Baiget, E. (2018). Strength training for improving hitting speed in tennis. Journalof Sport and Health Research, 3(3), 229-244.

Blackwell J.R. and Knudson, D.V. (2015) Vertical plane margins for error in the topspin forehand of intermediate tennis players. Medicina Sportiva 9(3), 83-86.

Gano-Overway, L.A. (2013). The caring climate: How sport environments can develop empathy in young people. In K. Pavlovich & K. Krahnke (Eds.), Organizing through empathy (pp. 166–183). New York: Routledge.

ITF. (2017) International Tennis Federation (ITF) Rules Of Tennis.

Kovacs, M. & Ellenbecker, T. (2019). A Performance Evaluation of the Tennis Serve: Implications for Strength, Speed, power, and Flexibility Training. Strength and Conditional Journal, 33(4), 22-30.

Martens, R. (2018). Successful coaching (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Miles, R. (2024) Symmetric sequential analysis: the efficiencies of sports scoring systems (with particular reference to those of tennis). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 46, 93-108.

Noddings, N. (2016). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Pollard, G. (2022) The effect of a variation to the assumption that the probability of winning a point in tennis is constant. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Australian Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sport. Bond University, Australia. 227-230.

Siahaan, D. (2018). The Effect of Horizontal Swing and Side Lateral Raise Training on Forehand Drive Skills in Tennis. Journal of Achievement.

Shyi-Kuen. Gross, M T. Prentice, W E. & Bing Yu. (2021). Comparison of Ball-and Racquet Impact Force Between Two Tennis Backhand Stroke Techniques. Journal of Orthopraedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 31(5): 247 – 254.

Smith, R.E., & Smoll, F.L. (2017). Sport psychology for youth coaches: Developing champions in sports and life. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

Stacey, E. & Gerbic, P. (2018). Success Factors for Blended Learning. Melbourne: Education Deakin University.

Vergauwen, L., Madou, B. and Behets, D. (2014) Authentic evaluation of forehand groundstrokes in young low-to intermediate-level tennis players. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 36(12), 2099-2106.

Vella, S., & Perlman, D. (2019). Mastery, autonomy and transformational approaches to coaching: Common features and applications. International Sport Coaching Journal, 1, 173–179. doi:10.1123/iscj.2013-0020.

Yudoprasetio, B. (2018). Learning Tennis Volume II. Jakarta: Bhatara Karya Aksara.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-01-31