Eco-Embodied Pedagogy for Inclusive Learning In Elementary School – A Systematic Literature Review

Authors

  • Ayubi Cakradiwati Universitas Terbuka
  • Erwin Rahmandita Universitas Terbuka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31851/hon.v9i2.22463

Abstract

Achieving quality, inclusive education for elementary students with special needs remains constrained in practice, despite longstanding international commitments such as the 1994 Salamanca Statement. Physical education (PE) may be uniquely positioned to advance this goal because it is organized around bodily movement rather than verbal-symbolic instruction, offering a natural, comparatively equal setting for students with differing sensory, motor, and behavioral profiles. Yet the pedagogical function of movement itself is often treated as incidental to nature-based or technology-based interventions rather than as their central mechanism. This study addresses that gap by systematically reviewing eco-embodied pedagogy, the integration of movement-based (embodied) learning with nature-based (eco) learning, with explicit attention to how bodily movement functions as the core pedagogical mechanism supporting learning for students with special needs (SSN) in elementary school. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching Scopus, ERIC, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Google Scholar, Garuda, and SINTA using three layers of search terms spanning general embodiment/nature-based concepts, disability- and intervention-specific terms, and physical-education-specific terms. Seventeen studies published between 2015 and 2025, spanning eight countries including Indonesia, met the inclusion criteria and were thematically synthesized. The findings show that movement functions as the core mechanism through which eco-embodied pedagogy supports sensorimotor and behavioral regulation, autism-specific engagement and well-being, and adapted physical education practice, while its benefits remain conditional on teacher preparedness rather than environmental access alone; Indonesian adapted physical education studies corroborate this pattern, identifying teacher competency, not infrastructure, as the primary implementation barrier. This review concludes that fundamental movement skills theory and embodied cognition theory converge to position eco-embodied pedagogy as a natural extension of adapted physical education, and recommends that PE curricula and teacher training in Indonesia explicitly adopt movement-centered, nature-integrated pedagogical strategies to strengthen inclusive elementary education.

References

Bradley, K., & Male, D. (2017). "Forest School is muddy and I like it": Perspectives of young children with autism spectrum disorders, their parents and educational professionals. Educational and Child Psychology, 34(2), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsecp.2017.34.2.80

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Di Palma, D., Gravino, G., Scala, G., Castellano, A., & Tafuri, G. (2023). Embodied education: Promoting school well-being through sports activities. Journal of Inclusive Methodology and Technology in Learning and Teaching, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.32043/jimtlt.v3i4.117

Forestry, S., Kristiyanto, A., & Legowo, E. (2019). Adaptive physical education for children with special needs at Lazuardi Kamila Elementary School. Journal of ICSAR, 3(2), 35–37. https://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/icsar/article/view/6430

Friedman, S., Gibson, J., Jones, C., & Hughes, C. (2022). "A new adventure": A case study of autistic children at Forest School. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2022.2115522

Gallahue, D. L., Ozmun, J. C., & Goodway, J. D. (2012). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, adults (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Godwin, E., Jarvis, L., & Gattis, M. (2025). Making outdoor learning accessible and inclusive for children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND): A case study. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2025.2601844

Hussein, H. (2020). Design of sensory gardens for children with disabilities in the context of the United Kingdom. In M. Khan, S. Bell, & J. Woods (Eds.), Place, pedagogy and play: Participation, design and research with children. Routledge.

Johnson, M., & Lakoff, G. (2002). Why cognitive linguistics requires embodied realism. Cognitive Linguistics, 13(3), 245–263. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2002.016

Johnson-Glenberg, M. C., Birchfield, D. A., Tolentino, L., & Koziupa, T. (2014). Collaborative embodied learning in mixed reality motion-capture environments: Two science studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034008

Kompas.com. (2024, April 2). Kemendikbud: 40.164 sekolah di Indonesia punya siswa disabilitas [Ministry of Education: 40,164 schools in Indonesia have students with disabilities]. https://www.kompas.com/edu/read/2024/04/02/160427971/kemendikbud-40164-sekolah-di-indonesia-punya-siswa-disabilitas

Kosmas, P., Ioannou, A., & Retalis, S. (2018). Moving bodies to moving minds: A study of the use of motion-based games in special education. TechTrends, 62(6), 594–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0294-5

Kourakli, M., Altanis, I., Retalis, S., Boloudakis, M., Zbainos, D., & Antonopoulou, K. (2017). Towards the improvement of the cognitive, motoric and academic skills of students with special educational needs using Kinect learning games. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 11, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2016.10.009

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. Basic Books.

Martínez-Monés, A., Villagrá-Sobrino, S., Fernández Faundez, E. M., & Jiménez Ruiz, M. (2020). Teachers' adoption of embodied learning digital games with an inclusive education approach: Lessons learnt from the INTELed project in Spain. In P. Zaphiris & A. Ioannou (Eds.), Learning and collaboration technologies. Human and technology ecosystems (HCII 2020, LNCS Vol. 12206, pp. 241–253). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50506-6_18

Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.

Natalini, A. (2024). Outdoor education, processes of inclusion of children with ADHD and learning disabilities. European Journal of Special Education Research, 10(1). https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejse/article/view/5385

Odame-Asante, E., Ani, C., & Mura, S. (2025). Nature-based learning and autism: A systematic review of autistic children's emotional health and behavioural outcomes. BJPsych Open. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2025.10207

Oktaviane, R. (2026). Readiness of inclusive elementary schools for the implementation of adaptive physical education learning. TEGAR: Journal of Teaching Physical Education in Elementary School, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/tegar.v9i2.98954

Özdemir Sarıalioğlu, R., & Karal, Y. (2025). Embodied learning enhanced with technology in special education: A systematic literature review. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (63), 924–947. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1576072

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Perla, L., Amati, I., Agrati, L. S., & Ascione, A. (2023). Technologies, sports and motor activities for an inclusive school. In M. Antona & C. Stephanidis (Eds.), Universal access in human-computer interaction (HCII 2023, LNCS Vol. 14021). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35897-5_25

Pouya, S., Bayındır, E., & Pouya, S. (2024). Sensory garden design proposal for children with autism spectrum disorder. Support for Learning, 39(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9604.12466

Saputra, S. Y., Fantiro, F. A., Herviani, V. K., Muzakki, A., & Akbar, R. F. (2024). Creative and adaptive sports learning model to increase participation of students with special needs. Research and Development in Education, 4(2), 1326–1335. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i2.36746

Szczytko, R., Carrier, S. J., & Stevenson, K. T. (2018). Impacts of outdoor environmental education on teacher reports of attention, behavior, and learning outcomes for students with emotional, cognitive, and behavioral disabilities. Frontiers in Education, 3, Article 46. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00046

UNESCO. (1994). The Salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. UNESCO.

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

World Bank. (2024, February 8). How Indonesia is including students with disabilities in school in rural Indonesia. https://www.worldbank.org/in/news/feature/2024/02/08/how-indonesia-is-including-students-with-disabilities-in-school-in-rural-indonesia

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-07-31