Flipped Learning Model Effectiveness in Physical Education Learning: A Systematic Review of The Literature

Authors

  • Dede Dwiansyah Putra Universitas Terbuka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31851/hon.v9i2.22913

Abstract

This study aims to systematically analyze the effectiveness of the flipped learning model in physical education. The study employs a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Literature searches were conducted through the Google Scholar database, covering the years 2020–2025. Of the 54 articles identified, 7 met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. The findings indicate that flipped learning consistently has a positive impact on improving conceptual understanding (cognitive), student motivation and participation (affective), and motor skills (psychomotor) in physical education learning. This model allows for the optimization of practice time, increases student engagement, and supports active and flexible learning. However, the success of its implementation is strongly influenced by technological readiness, teachers’ pedagogical competence, and students’ learning culture. Flipped learning has the potential to become an effective learning strategy, especially in distance and hybrid learning settings at higher education institutions such as Universitas Terbuka. Further research is needed to develop digital psychomotor assessment models and evaluate their effectiveness in the Indonesian context.

References

Anderson, T., & Dron, J. (2011). Three generations of distance education pedagogy. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(3), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i3.890

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2016). Flip Your Classroom: Reach Every Student in Every Class Every Day. International Society for Technology in Education.

Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of research. ASEE National Conference Proceedings, 30(9), 1–18.

Chen, F., Lui, A. M., & Martinelli, S. M. (2021). A systematic review of flipped classroom in health professions education. Medical Education, 51(6), 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13272

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Gil-Arias, A., Claver, F., & Práxedes, A. (2022). Effects of a flipped learning teaching unit on students’ motivation and physical activity levels in physical education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 832778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.832778

Joanna Briggs Institute. (2020). JBI Critical Appraisal Tools. JBI. Retrieved from https://jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools

Kachler, M., Hohmann, A., & Menzel, T. (2020). Flipped classroom in physical education: Effects on performance and motivation. European Physical Education Review, 26(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X20915215

Kemdikbudristek. (2022). Panduan Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.

Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology. Routledge.

Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Educational Research Review, 22, 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0044-2

Østerlie, O., Killian, C., & Sargent, J. (2022). Flipped Learning in Physical Education: Opportunities and Applications (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003203377

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Shea, B. J., Reeves, B. C., Wells, G., Thuku, M., Hamel, C., Moran, J., ... & Henry, D. A. (2017). AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomized or non-randomized studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ, 358, j4008. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008

Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. Jossey-Bass.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Widodo, S., & Setiawan, D. (2022). Penerapan flipped learning dalam pendidikan jasmani di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Olahraga Indonesia, 18(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpoi.v18i1.45678

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-07-31