Efektivitas Asas Kerahasiaan Arbitase Indonesia: Antara Perlindungan Informasi dan Tuntutan Transparansi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/lexmercatoria.v2i2.20817Abstract
This article provides an in-depth examination of the effectiveness of the confidentiality principle in Indonesian arbitration amid growing public demands for transparency in dispute resolution. Drawing on a normative legal research design, the study applies statute, conceptual and analytical approaches to role and limitations of confidentiality as mandated by Indonesian Law No. 30 of 1999. The research indentifies theree core findings that is frist, confidentiality remains essential for preseving party autonomy, business privacy, and the efficiency of arbitration, second, insufficient regulatory guidance contributes to inconsistencies the implementation confidentiality, especially in dispute involving State Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and public funds, third, global developments, particulary the UNCITRAL. Transparency Rules and ICSID reforms highlight a shift toward selective transparency for the sake of public accountability. This article contributes to the literature by offering a detailed analytical model of harmonizing these competing interests.
Keywords:
Arbitration confidentiality, transparency, Indonesian Arbitration, Public accountability, Dispute resolution
Downloads
References
Buku:
Gary Born, International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 2021.
Redfern & Hunter, Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration, Oxford University Press, 2015.
Julian D. M. Lwe, Loukas Mistelis & Stefan Kröll, Comparative International Commercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International, 2003.
Jurnal:
S. Strong, ”Beyond Confidentiality: The Uses and Limits of Transparency in International Arbitration,”Journal of International Arbitration, 2014.
Petra Bulter, ”The Transparency Paradox in International Arbitration,” Victoria University Wellington Law Review, 2017.
M. Sornarajah, ”State Responsibility and Transparency in Investor-State Arbitration,” ICSID Review, 2011.
Christopher Drahozal, ”Condifidentiality in Arbitration,” University of Kansas Law Review, 2008.
Peaturan & Instrumen Hukum:
Undang – Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa.
UNCITRAL Arbitation Rules (2013).
UNCITRAL Rulen on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration (2014).
