About the Journal

Scope

Articles published by the focus and scope of community service activities are:
Education

Peer Review Process

Submitted papers are subject to a strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper of articles through an anonymous review process. All manuscripts are sent to be reviewed critically by the Reviewer. The review process is a blind peer review.

As soon as the review process is complete, the authors will be notified by email about acceptance or rejection contributing author for publication in the journal Caradde. If the author is encouraged to re-submit the corrected article, any changes suggested to the script will be reviewed by the same expert reviewer and editor of the same section. Answers to comments must be clearly stated in the article and retransmission must be accompanied by a letter with a detailed response to reviewers' comments. the review process takes 6-9 week

Publication Frequency

Mei and Nopember 2 issues in 1 years

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethics

Code of ethics statement is based on the scientific publication LIPI Regulation No. 5 of 2014 on the Code of Ethics of Scientific Publications and COPE, which upholds 3 ethics in publications, namely: (i) the neutrality, clear of conflicts of interest in the publication processing; (ii) justice, giving the author the right to claim his paper; and (iii) Honesty, clearly from duplication, fabrication, forgery, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications.

Publication and authorship 

  1. All submitted papers are subject to a strict peer-review process by at least two reviewers that are experts in the area of the particular paper.
  2. Review processare blind peer review.
  3. The factors that are taken into account in review are relevance, soundness, significance, originality, readability and language.
  4. The possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revisions, or rejection.
  5. If authors are encouraged to revise and resubmit a submission, there is no guarantee that the revised submission will be accepted.
  6. Rejected articles will not be re-reviewed.
  7. The paper acceptance is constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringementandplagiarism.
  8. No research can be included in more than one publication.

Responsibilities of editors

  1. Editors have complete responsibility and authority to reject/accept an article.
  2. Editors are responsible for the contents and overall quality of the publication.
  3. Editors should always consider the needs of the authors and the readers when attempting to improve the publication.
  4. Editors should guarantee the quality of the papers and the integrity of the academic record.
  5. Editors should publish errata pages or make corrections when needed.
  6. Editors should have a clear picture ofa research’sfunding sources.
  7. Editors should base their decisions solelyonethe papers’ importance, originality, clarityandrelevance to publication’s scope.
  8. Editors should not reverse their decisions nor overturn the ones of previous editors without serious reason.
  9. Editors should preserve the anonymity of reviewers.
  10. Editors should ensure that all research material they publish conforms to internationally accepted ethical guidelines.
  11. Editors should only accept a paper when reasonably certain.
  12. Editors should act if they suspect misconduct, whether a paper is published or unpublished, and make all reasonable attempts to persist in obtaining a resolution to the problem.
  13. Editors should not reject papers based on suspicions, they should have proof of misconduct.
  14. Editors should not allow any conflicts of interest between staff, authors, reviewersandboard members.

Responsibilities of the authors

  1. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work.
  2. Authors must certify that the manuscript has not previously been published elsewhere.
  3. Authors must certify that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. 
  4. Authors must participate in the peer review process. 
  5. Authors are obliged to provide retractions or corrections of mistakes.
  6. All Authors mentioned in the paper must have significantly contributed to the research.
  7. Authors must state that all data in the paper are real and authentic.
  8. Authors must notify the Editors of any conflicts of interest.
  9. Authors must identify all sources used in the creation of their manuscript.
  10. Authors must report any errors they discover in their published paper to the Editors.

Responsibilities of the Reviewers

  1. Reviewers should keep all information regarding papers confidential and treat them as privileged information.
  2. Reviewers must review articles according to their field of expertise
  3. Reviews should be conducted objectively, with no personal criticism of the author
  4. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments
  5. Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors.
  6. Reviewers should also call to the Editor in Chief’s attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
  7. Reviewers should not review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
  8. The reviewer must provide recommendations on the results of the article review

Plagiarisme Checker

Wahana Dedikasi: Jurnal PkM Ilmu Kependidikan berkomitmen untuk menjaga integritas akademik dan memastikan bahwa setiap artikel yang dipublikasikan bebas dari unsur plagiarisme. Oleh karena itu, sebelum artikel diterima untuk publikasi, semua naskah akan melalui proses pemeriksaan plagiarisme menggunakan perangkat lunak Turnitin.

Kami menetapkan bahwa tingkat kemiripan (similarity index) yang diperbolehkan tidak boleh melebihi 25%. Jika hasil pemeriksaan menunjukkan kemiripan lebih dari 25%, penulis akan diminta untuk melakukan revisi sesuai dengan pedoman yang diberikan. Artikel yang memiliki tingkat plagiarisme tinggi atau tidak sesuai dengan kebijakan plagiarisme jurnal akan ditolak.

Kami mendorong semua penulis untuk memastikan bahwa karya yang dikirimkan merupakan hasil orisinal, dan setiap sumber referensi yang digunakan harus dikutip dengan benar sesuai dengan gaya kutipan yang ditetapkan oleh jurnal.

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish this journal agree to the following conditions:

The author has the copyright and entitles the journal to the first publication with works that are licensed simultaneously under the Creative Commons Attribution CC BY License which allows others to share their work with the recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publications in this journal.
 
The author can make separate additional contract agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to the institutional repository or publishing them in a book), with recognition of the initial publication in this journal.
 
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their websites) before and during the delivery process because it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as quotes that are earlier and larger than published works