DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF SLANG EXPRESSIONS IN TIKTOK AUTOMATIC SUBTITLES (ENGLISH–INDONESIAN)

Authors

  • Arda Lestari Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Negeri Mandailing Natal, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31851/2zjh0098

Keywords:

Discourse analysis, slang expressions, TikTok, automatic subtitles, digital communication, sociolinguistics, social media discourse

Abstract

This study examines English slang expressions and their Indonesian automatic subtitles on TikTok from a discourse analysis perspective. It aims to identify slang types, explore their communicative functions, and analyze their contributions to meaning construction and social interaction. Using a descriptive qualitative method, data were collected from selected TikTok videos containing English slang and their Indonesian automatic subtitles. The analysis draws on discourse analysis and sociolinguistic theories of language use, identity, and informal communication. The findings indicate that colloquial slang is the most dominant category, followed by social/identity, regional, and conversational slang. These expressions serve various functions, including expressing identity, solidarity, humor, intimacy, and group membership. They also contribute to digital discourse by creating informal and interactive communication that reflects contemporary online culture. However, automatic subtitles do not always accurately convey the contextual and social meanings of slang, potentially reducing their communicative functions and cultural nuances. This study highlights the significance of slang in reflecting social relationships, cultural values, and identity construction in digital communication. It contributes to discourse analysis, sociolinguistics, and digital communication studies.

References

Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (2006). Forbidden words: Taboo and the censoring of language. Cambridge University Press.

Alshaye, S. A. (2025). Semantic errors in machine translation: A study of colloquial Arabic-English captions on TikTok. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 7(9), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v7i9.10711

Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Computer-mediated communication and linguistic landscapes. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(3), 321–326.

Baker, P. (2011). Sociolinguistics and corpus linguistics. Edinburgh University Press.

Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407

Chairunnisa, C., & Pawitri, A. (2026). Penggunaan bahasa gaul pada TikTok sebagai representasi identitas sosial Generasi Z: Kajian sosiolinguistik. Jurnal Sasindo UNPAM, 14(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.32493/sasindo.v14i1.66-75

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darvin, R. (2022). Design, resistance and the performance of identity on TikTok. Discourse, Context & Media, 46, Article 100591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100591

Dewi, N. P. J. L. (2024). Penggunaan variasi bahasa "slang language" pada platform TikTok untuk Generasi Z: Kajian sosiolinguistik. Scholars, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31959/js.v2i1.2352

Díaz-Cintas, J., & Remael, A. (2021). Audiovisual translation: Subtitling (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315834368

Gee, J. P. (2014). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (4th ed.). Routledge.

Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning.

Ilbury, C., & Walcott, R. (2026). "Gen Z language? Y'all mean AAVE": The appropriation of African American Vernacular English as "TikTok language". Journal of Sociolinguistics, 30(3), 255–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.70024

Istiqomah, A., Safaah, T. N., & Haryati, G. (2025). Variasi bahasa dalam komentar TikTok: Kajian sosiolinguistik digital. J-CEKI: Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah, 4(6), 979–985. https://doi.org/10.56799/jceki.v4i6.10418

Jones, R. H., Chik, A., & Hafner, C. A. (2015). Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726465

Jose, A. I., Nurulaen, Y., & Listiani, T. (2025). Exploring slang words on social media TikTok in 2024. Linguistics and ELT Journal, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.31764/leltj.v13i1.31704

Koehn, P. (2020). Neural machine translation.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2021). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.).

Manihuruk, L. L., Ginting, D., Manik, S., & Manurung, L. W. (2025). Slang words used by the millennial Indonesian generation in TikTok. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 302–308. https://doi.org/10.52622/joal.v4i2.362

Mattiello, E. (2008). An introduction to English slang: A description of its morphology, semantics and sociology.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.).

Muhsyanur, M., Sudikan, S. Y., & Murugesa, M. (2025). Linguistic identity negotiation on TikTok: Glocal practices of Indonesian content creators. LiNGUA: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra, 20(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v20i2.32574

Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J. W., & Zappavigna, M. (2014). Researching language and social media: A student guide.

Partridge, E. (2006). Slang: The language of the underworld.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.).

Rahmi, A. (2025). Translation strategies for slang in the subtitles of "My Stupid Boss 2". Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 3(4), 625–634. https://doi.org/10.57248/jishum.v3i4.586

Renata, F. A., & Lahay, S. J. (2024). An analysis of types of English slang words and strategies for their Indonesian translation in the Chappie movie. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, dan Sastra, 10(3), 2749–2761. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v10i3.3751

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse.

Shofiyah, Q., Aulia, P. N., & Meinawati, E. (2026). Language innovation and identity: The sociolinguistics of Gen Z slang on TikTok. Humanitatis: Journal of Language and Literature, 12(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.30812/humanitatis.v12i2.6030

Suminar, R. P. (2024). Translation strategies of American teenagers' slang: A descriptive analysis. JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(3), 1562–1572. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i3.10009

Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action.

van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as social interaction.

van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach.

Weninger, C., & Lim, H. (2025). Singlish in TikToks. Asian Englishes, 27(2), 478–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13488678.2025.2475710

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2016). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed.).

Xavierine, J., binti Zainal Shah, N., bin Kamarulzaman, M. H., Shanthi, A., & Bryce, J. (2026). Multimodal orchestration in TikTok vocabulary videos: A qualitative analysis of vocabulary meaning making. Journal of Communication, Language and Culture, 6(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.33093/jclc.2026.6.2.17

Yule, G. (2020). The study of language (7th ed.).

Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-07