Analyzing Students’ Adversity Quotient to See Students’ Deductive Reasoning Capabilities in Solving Mathematical Problems on Linear Program Materials

Syifah Fajria; Nizlel Huda; Maison Maison

doi:10.31851/jmksp.v9i1.13966

Authors

Syifah Fajria Universitas Jambi
Nizlel Huda Universitas Jambi
Maison Maison Universitas Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31851/jmksp.v9i1.13966

Keywords:

Adversity Quotient, Deductive Reasoning Ability, Solution to problem

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine and characterize students’ use of deductive reasoning when addressing mathematical problems using linear programming that is based on the Adversity Quotient. This kind of study is qualitative and descriptive. Purposive sampling was the method of sampling employed in this study. There were three different sorts of pupils in class XI IPA I SMA Negeri 5 Batanghari: Quitter, Camper, and Climber types. There were 19 total participants in the study. Each category was represented by one subject, resulting in three students who were chosen as research subjects. Questionnaires, interviews, and tests of problem-solving were the research instruments employed in this study. The processes of (1) Reducing the data, (2) Presenting the data, and (3) Concluding were used to evaluate the collected data. The research’s findings demonstrate that Quitter-type kids are capable of performing calculations based on rules or formulas to comprehend difficulties. Still, they are unable to meet the problem-solving markers when it comes to formulating logical conclusions and gathering direct evidence. Students who are camper type can compute using rules or formulas to comprehend problems, plan, and carry out plans, but they are unable to double-check. Students cannot meet the issue-solving markers when they are gathering direct facts and generating logical conclusions. Students who are climber types can satisfy deductive reasoning requirements by comprehending problems, making plans, carrying them out, and double-checking.

References

Aini, N. N., & Mukhlis, M. (2020). Analysis of Problem Solving Ability in Mathematics Story Problems Based on Polya Theory Viewed from the Adversity Quotient. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 2(1), 105–128. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2020.v2i1.105-128

Almira, A. (2014). Reasoning and communication skills in mathematics learning - Google Search. Jurnal IAIN Logaritma.

Amanda, N., & Nusantara, T. (2020). Analysis of Students' Critical Thinking on Mathematical Problem Solving at MTs Surya Buana Malang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, 8(2), 89–92. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v8i2.19660

Baharullah, B., Wahyuddin, W., Usman, M. R., & Syam, N. (2022). Profile of Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in View from the Adversity Quotient (AQ). AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2), 1039. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4766

Baihaqi, A. (2020). Analysis of Mathematical Critical Thinking Abilities Reviewed From Adversity Quotient [Universitas Siliwangi]. http://repositori.unsil.ac.id/5254/2/5 abstrak.pdf

Diana, N. (2018). Developing Students’ Creative Thinking and Logical Thinking Abilities with Adversity Quotient in Problem Solving.

Ervani, R. S. R., Susanto, Setiawan, T. B., Pambudi, D. S., & Monalisa, L. A. (2019). Mathematical Reasoning Students assisted by the Olympiad in solving questions from the National Science Olympiad in mathematics with g.

Handayani, I. (2018). The Influence Of The Open-Ended Approach Against The Ability Of The Creative Thinking And Mathematical Communication Skills Of Students.

Hofifah, F., Styo Siskawati, F., Novita Irawati, T., & Islam Jember, U. (2023). Analysis of Vocational School Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in View from the Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Edumath, 9(1), 40–46.

Indah, P., & Nuraeni, R. (2021). Comparison of Mathematical Deductive Reasoning Ability Through PBL and IBL Models Based on KAM. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(1).

Limustafa, M., & Awan, H. (2019). Analysis of High School Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Ability on Function Limits. Prosiding Seminar Nasional, 16–19. https://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/Prosiding/article/view/893/906

Maulyda, M. A. (2019). NCTM Based Mathematics Learning Paradigm Elementary School View project Development of Android Application for Primary Schools Students View project.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for school mathematics.

Polya, G. (1973). How To Solve It.

Rahmi, D., Putra, M. A., & Kurniati, A. (2021). Analysis of Problem Solving Ability Based on the Adversity Quotient (AQ) of Mathematics High School Students. 7(2), 85–94. https://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JUPE/article/download/3335/2581

Septian, A., Widodo, S. A., Afifah, I. N., Nisa, D. Z., Putri, N. P. K., Tyas, M. D., Nisa, R. H., & Andriani, A. (2022). Mathematical Problem Solving Ability in Indonesia. Journal of Instructional Mathematics, 3(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.37640/jim.v3i1.1223

Shodiqin, A., Sukestiyarno, Wardono, Isnarto, & Utomo, P. . (2020). Problem Solving Profile According to Krulik and Rudnick Judging from the Capabilities of Wolfram Mathematica. Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana.

Stoltz, G. P. (2007). Adversity Quotient: Turning Obstacles into Opportunities, translation: Hermaya.T. PT Grasindo.

Sumarmo, U., & Permana, Y. (2013). Developing Reasoning Abilities and Mathematical Connections in High School Students Through Problem-Based Learning.

Wahyuni, G., Mujib, A., Muslim, U., & Medan, N. A. (2022). Analysis of Visual Thinking Ability in View from the Adversity Quotient. JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 7(2), 289–295. https://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JUPE/article/download/3335/2581

Widodo, S. A., Darhim, D., & Ikhwanudin, T. (2018). Improving mathematical problem solving skills through visual media. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 948(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012004