The Impact of Groupthink, Group Cohesiveness, and Bounded Rationality on the Quality of Decision Making: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/jmksp.v9i1.14668Keywords:
Bounded Rationality, Groupthink, Group Cohesiveness, Quality of Decision MakingAbstract
This research conducted a systematic literature review of the impact of groupthink, group cohesiveness, and bounded rationality on group decision making. Through a systematic analysis method of relevant literature, the research results reveal that the interaction between these three factors significantly influences the quality of the group decision-making process. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of these three factors in one conceptual framework, providing holistic insights that can be the basis for developing more effective strategies in improving the quality of group decision making. The contribution of this research is important in the social psychology and group decision-making literature, highlighting practical implications for improving decision-making processes in group contexts.
References
Agosto, D. E. (2002). Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people’s web-based decision making. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10024
Aziz, A., Sharif, A. A., & Mohammed, O. (2019). Groupthink and Quality of Decision-Making Process Among the Top Managers of the Public Universities of Kurdistan Region. April. https://doi.org/10.23918/icabep2019p10
Callaway, M. R., & Esser, J. K. (2006). Groupthink: Effects of Cohesiveness and Problem-Solving Procedures on Group Decision Making. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 12(2), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1984.12.2.157
Chapman, J. (2006). Anxiety and defective decision making: An elaboration of the groupthink model. Management Decision, 44(10), 1391–1404. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740610715713
Dhami, S., al-Nowaihi, A., & Sunstein, C. R. (2019). Heuristics and Public Policy: Decision-making Under Bounded Rationality. Studies in Microeconomics, 7(1), 7–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/2321022219832148
Farkas, J. (2016). The Drawbacks of Group Decision Making from a Psychological Aspect: The Pitfalls of Groupthink and How to Handle Them. XVI(2), 67–78.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. In A theory of cognitive dissonance. (pp. xi, 291–xi, 291). Stanford University Press.
Hernandez, J. G. V., & Ortega, R. P. (2019). Bounded rationality in decision–making. MOJ Current Research & Reviews, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15406/mojcrr.2019.02.00047
Hogg, D. (2013). Application of Groupthink to Generation Y Decision Making Processes within a Professional Services Context in New Zealand. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(8), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n8p69
Janis. (1972). Irving L. Janis’ Victims of Groupthink. Political Psychology, 12(2), 247–278. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791464
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
Kitchenham. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. In Empirical Software Engineering (Vol. 25, Issue 1). Keele University. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-019-09747-0
Leana, C. R. (1985). A Partial Test of Janis’ Groupthink Model: Effects of Group Cohesiveness and Leader Behavior on Defective Decision Making. Journal of Management, 11(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638501100102
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The Science of “Muddling Through.” Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677
Lohan, G., Acton, T., & Conboy, K. (2013). The Impact of Group Cohesiveness on Decision Making Outcomes Under Conditions of Challenging and Hindrance Time Pressure. International Research Workshop on IT Project Management 2013, 2, 159–166. http://aisel.aisnet.org/irwitpm2013/2?utm_source=aisel.aisnet.org%2Firwitpm2013%2F2&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages
March, J. (1991). Organizations and Decision Making (Vol. 27, Issue 2, pp. 2484–2487). Wiley-Blackwell.
Mullen, B. (1994). Group Cohesiveness and Quality of Decision Making An Integration of Test of the Groupthink Hypothesis (p. Vol. 25 No. 2.). SAGE Publications Inc.
Mullen, B., Anthony, T., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1994). Group Cohesiveness and Quality of Decision Making: An Integration of Tests of the Groupthink Hypothesis. Small Group Research, 25(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496494252003
Pitf, L. F., & Nel, D. (1990). The effects of group cohesiveness on decision performance in a simulated marketing environment. South African Journal of Sociology, 21(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580144.1990.10432111
Sáenz-Royo, C., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2022). Functional Representation of the Intentional Bounded Rationality of Decision-Makers: A Laboratory to Study the Decisions a Priori. Mathematics, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10050739
Sáenz-Royo, C., Chiclana, F., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2023a). Intentional bounded rationality methodology to assess the quality of decision-making approaches with latent alternative performances. Information Fusion, 89, 254–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2022.08.019
Schafer, M., & Crichlow, S. (2002). The process-outcome connection in foreign policy decision making: A quantitative study building on groupthink. International Studies Quarterly, 46(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2478.00222
Simon, H. A. (1986). Rationality in Psychology and Economics. The Journal of Business, 59(4), S209–S224. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2352757
Supriatin, H., Widodo, S. E., & Retnowati, R. (2017). The Effect of Learning Strategy Training and Group Cohesiveness on Effectiveness of Decision Making. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 5(9), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.0509003
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan) by http://www.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/e_jurnal/index.php/JMKSP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.