Corporate Morality: A Systematic Review and Future Research Directions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/jmksp.v9i2.16645Keywords:
Corporate Morality, Ethics, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
The purpose of this study is to systematically review previous research on corporate morality, which is still under-researched. This research is to fill the literature gap and become a comprehensive understanding of corporate morality in the business environment. This study searched all publications examining corporate morality published from 1988 - 2023. A total of 13 studies from 23 articles were found from the Scopus database. This study found that corporate morality is the moral and ethical principles adopted by a company to direct its business actions and decisions. In addition, the findings of this study also managed to establish several factors that make up corporate morality as antecedents and impacts of corporate morality. However, this literature review only uses 1 database, namely Scopus, so further research can expand the scope of articles reviewed by using other data sources. This research contributes to helping academics and practitioners create more moral business plans.
References
Ahmad, S., Omar, R., Ahmad, S., Omar, R., Agyei-mensah, B. K., Ofoeda, I., Gariba, P., Amoah, L., Abdul, T., Dalwai, R., Basiruddin, R., Zaleha, S., & Rasid, A. (2016). Basic corporate governance models: a systematic review. International Journal of Law and Management.
Alawattage, C., Jayathileka, C., Hitibandara, R., & Withanage, S. (2023). Moral economy, performative materialism, and political rhetorics of sustainability accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 95(August 2021), 102507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2022.102507
Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003. Technovation, 26(5–6), 644–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.016
Bunderson, S. (2012). Normal Injustices and Morality in Complex Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 33(3), 181–190.
Cavusgil, S. T. (1990). Marketing research on Mergers and Acquisitions: a systematic review and future directions. In Marketing Intelligence & Planning (Vol. 8, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000001082
Dubbink, W., & Ven, bert van de. (2012). On the Duties of Commission in Commercial Life . A Kantian Criticism of Moral Institutionalism Author ( s ): Wim Dubbink and Bert van de Ven Source : Ethical Theory and Moral Practice , April 2012 , Vol . 15 , No . 2 ( April 2012 ), pp . Published by : Sp. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 15(2), 221–238.
Foo, L. M. (2007). Stakeholder engagement in emerging economies: Considering the strategic benefits of stakeholder management in a cross-cultural and geopolitical context. Corporate Governance, 7(4), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700710820461
Freeman, R. E., Gilbert, D. R., & Hartman, E. (1988). Values and the foundations of strategic management. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(11), 821–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383045
Khan, M., Hassan, A., Harrison, C., & Tarbert, H. (2020). CSR reporting: a review of research and agenda for future research. Management Research Review, 43(11), 1395–1419. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-02-2019-0073
Nayak, A. (2008). Experiencing Creativity in Organisations: A Practice Approach. Long Range Planning, 41(4), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.05.001
Oliveira, M., Proença, T., & Ferreira, M. R. (2022). Do corporate volunteering programs and perceptions of corporate morality impact perceived employer attractiveness? Social Responsibility Journal, 18(7), 1229–1250. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2021-0109
Osigweh, C. A. B. (1994). A stakeholder perspective of employee responsibilities and rights. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 7(4), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02621214
Pascucci, F., Ancillai, C., & Cardinali, S. (2018). Exploring antecedents of social media usage in B2B: a systematic review. Management Research Review, 41(6), 629–656. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-07-2017-0212
Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review. Group and Organization Management, 40(3), 428–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114560063
Poruthiyil, P. V. (2012). Using religious epics for enhancing morality a case for reflective judgments. Economic and Political Weekly, 47(45), 73–79.
Ruth, D. (2014). Leader as priest: Plucking the fruit of a flawed metaphor. Leadership, 10(2), 174–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715012467488
Schlegelmilch, B. B., & Houston, J. E. (1989). Corporate Codes of Ethics in Large UK Companies-An Emperical Investigation (journal of european marketing) .pdf. European Journal of Marketing, 23(6), 7–24.
Schreyögg, G., & Steinmann, H. (1989). Corporate morality called in question: The case of Cabora Bassa. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(9), 677–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384204
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review* Introduction: the need for an evidence- informed approach. British Journal of Management, 14, 207–222.
Vergiansyah, I., Supriharyanti, E., Niska, F., Nadia, D., Airlangga, U., Java, E., Katolik, U., & Mandala, W. (2024). Humble Leadership in Education : A Systematic Review and Future Direction. JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, Dan Supervisi Pendidikan), 9(2), 1179–1196.
Wempe, B. (2008). Contractarian business ethics: Credentials and design criteria. Organization Studies, 29(10), 1337–1355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840608093546
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Erika Fajar Subhekti, Erick Fajar Subhekti, Fiona Niska Dinda Nadia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan) by http://www.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/e_jurnal/index.php/JMKSP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.