Human Capital Education Management and Supply Chain Recovery Strategies in State-Owned Construction Companies: PT Waskita Karya Economic Equilibrium Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/jmksp.v11i1.21725Keywords:
Supply Chain Management, Recovery Strategy, Construction SOE, Economic Equilibrium, Vendor Participation, PT Waskita Karya (Persero) TbkAbstract
PT Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk (WSKT) faces significant challenges in procurement management, leading to project delays and cost overruns. This study aims to analyze the causes of low vendor participation through the perspective of supply-demand curves and proposes strategic solutions to restore market equilibrium. The methodology employed is a case study with a qualitative descriptive analysis, supported by microeconomic modeling. The results indicate that supply inelasticity, driven by payment risks, causes a leftward shift in the supply curve, creating a deadweight loss. This article recommends five integrative strategies: the establishment of a Vendor Support Center (WISE), Debt-to-Asset Shareholding negotiations, dynamic pricing mechanisms, the use of Memorandums of Understanding (MoU) during the tender phase, and early completion incentives. Moving beyond traditional operational perspectives, the study offers original contributions through the quantification of deadweight loss caused by vendor payment risks and the introduction of the WISE framework to restore supply elasticity. Key innovations include a unique "Debt-to-Asset Shareholding" model that converts liabilities into strategic asset equity, and the adaptation of dynamic pricing to mitigate international material price volatility. By utilizing a sequential supply curve recovery model, this research provides a new methodology for synchronizing legal commitments and performance-based incentives to achieve high-output market equilibrium.
References
Andreoli-Versbach, P., & Gans, J. (2024). Interplay between Amazon store and logistics. European Competition Journal, 20(2), 460–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441056.2024.2312494
Bechtel Corporation. (n.d.). Memorandum of understanding for supply chain stability. Corporate Procurement Guidelines.
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2016). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (6th ed.). Pearson.
Christopher, M. (2016). Logistics & Supply Chain Management (5th ed.). Financial Times Publishing. (Menyediakan landasan teoritis mengenai pentingnya transformasi hubungan transaksional menjadi aliansi strategis guna memulihkan elastisitas suplai).
Fauzi, M. A., & Kusuma, A. (2023). Strategi manajemen rantai pasok pada perusahaan jasa konstruksi BUMN dalam menghadapi krisis likuiditas. Jurnal Manajemen Transportasi & Logistik, 10(1), 45–58.
Hansen, S., & Wiguna, I. P. A. (2021). Knowledge management implementation in Indonesian construction companies. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 19(6), 1433–1450. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEDT-02-2020-0056
Kementerian Badan Usaha Milik Negara. (2024, Maret 22). Pemerintah terus dorong restrukturisasi dan penyehatan BUMN Karya. Siaran Pers Resmi. (Berita resmi dari kementerian terkait strategi penyelamatan likuiditas BUMN).
Liker, J., & Choi, T. (2004). Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Business Review, 82(12), 104–113.
Mankiw, N. G. (2021). Principles of microeconomics (9th ed.). Cengage Learning. (Referensi buku teks utama untuk teori kurva penawaran-permintaan dan deadweight loss).
Pindyck, R. S., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (2018). Microeconomics (9th ed.). Pearson. (Digunakan untuk memperkuat justifikasi perilaku ekonomi vendor dalam menginternalisasi premi risiko ke dalam fungsi penawaran).
PT Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk. (2024). Company exposure quarter 3 year 2024 [Internal document]. Jakarta, Indonesia.
PT Waskita Karya (Persero) Tbk. (2024). SCM monthly evaluation on September 2024 [Internal document]. Jakarta, Indonesia.
Rachman, T., Susanto, H., & Prasetyo, E. D. (2022). Analisis mitigasi risiko keterlambatan material proyek infrastruktur menggunakan metode house of risk. Jurnal Sistem dan Manajemen Industri, 6(1), 12–24.
Sari, K., & Winarno, S. (2024). Efektivitas implementasi supply chain management (SCM) terhadap kinerja proyek pada BUMN karya. Jurnal Konstruksia, 15(2), 89–102.
Selçuk, A. M., & Avşar, Z. M. (2019). Dynamic pricing in airline revenue management. Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, 18(4), 284–296. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-018-00171-w
Tang, C. S. (2006). Robust strategies for mitigating supply chain disruptions. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 9(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675560500405584 (Mendukung konseptualisasi strategi pemulihan rantai pasok ketika menghadapi guncangan likuiditas eksternal).
Varian, H. R. (2014). Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach (9th ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. (Sebagai acuan teoritis fundamental untuk permodelan matematis pergeseran kurva, surplus produsen/konsumen, dan kalkulasi deadweight loss).
Wibowo, M. A., & Sholeh, M. N. (2021). The analysis of supply chain management implementation of construction project in Indonesia. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-020-00564-2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Buyung W Prinatama

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

JMKSP (Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, dan Supervisi Pendidikan) by http://www.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/e_jurnal/index.php/JMKSP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









1.png)
