Peer Review Process

Every article submitted to Wahana Didaktika: Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan undergoes a rigorous selection process to ensure the quality of publication.

1. Initial Screening by the Editorial Board

• The Editorial Board will review each submission to assess its alignment with the journal’s focus and scope, as well as adherence to the author guidelines.
• Articles that do not meet the basic criteria may be rejected or returned to the author for revision before proceeding to the next stage.

2. Peer Review Process (Mitra Bebestari)

• Articles that pass the initial screening will be sent to Peer Reviewers (Mitra Bebestari) who are experts in the relevant field.
• This journal follows a Blind Peer Review system, where the identities of both the authors and the reviewers are kept confidential to ensure objectivity and maintain high-quality evaluation.

3. Evaluation and Revision

• Peer reviewers will assess the article based on substantial and technical aspects, including the clarity of arguments, scientific contributions, research methodology, and relevance to the field of education.
• The review outcome can result in one of the following decisions:
  • Accepted without revisions
  • Accepted with minor revisions
  • Accepted with major revisions
  • Rejected
• Articles requiring revisions will be returned to the authors for improvements based on the feedback from the reviewers.

4. Review Duration

• The entire peer review process typically takes a maximum of one month, depending on the authors' responsiveness in addressing the required revisions.

5. Final Decision and Publication

• After the revisions are completed, the article will undergo a final review by the Editorial Board before acceptance for publication.
• Accepted articles will then proceed to the final editing stage before being officially published in the journal.

Wahana Didaktika is committed to collaborating with competent and experienced Peer Reviewers to ensure that every published article meets high academic standards.