THE USE OF FACILITIES STRATEGY IN IMPROVING INDONESIAN STUDENTS’ LANGUAGE LEARNING OUTCOMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v7i2.15355Keywords:
Learning Facilities, Learning Outcomes, IndonesianAbstract
The purpose of this study is to ascertain whether class IV students at SDN 90 Palembang are able to improve their learning outcomes in Indonesian language proficiency through the usage of learning facilities. A pre-experimental approach using a one-group pretest-posttest design was employed in this study. The sample method used in this study was non-probability sampling combined with a saturated sampling methodology, and the population consisted of all 24 class IV students at SDN 90 Palembang. The paired sample t-test is the analysis method employed in the study. The questionnaire instrument's t test analysis findings show that there areWith a significance level of 0.05 and a significant value of 0.000 (two tailed), the result is rejected and accepted since the significant value is less than 0.05 and 1.713. Concurrently, the hypothesis positing that the test questions on learning outcomes were significant (two-tailed) was rejected and accepted at a significance level of 0.05, since the significant value was 0.000 < 0.05 and 1.713. Thus, it can be said that class IV students at SD Negeri 90 Palembang are learning more Indonesian as a result of their use of the learning facilities.30,310 > t_(hitung ) t_(hitung ) 9,737 > t_(tabel ) H_0 H_a t_(tabel) H_0 H_a.
References
Ahsani, & et al. (2021). Pelinfluence Infrastructure in Melsupport PrelBe stationlelementary school students study in SelIndonesian schoollSia Deln Haag. PGMI Study Program, 8, 52-63.
Ali, M. (2020). PelmbelIndonesian language lessonslsia and Satra (BASASTRA) in Selelementary school. P.ElRNIK PAUD Journal, 3, 35-44.
Ananda, R., & Hayati, F. (2020). Variablesll Belstudy.Meland: CV. Pusdikra Mitra Jaya.
Arikunto, S. (2019). ProselDur Pelnellitian PelNdelPractical words.Jakarta: RinelKa Cipta.
ArmarielNa, D.N., & Prasrihamni, M. (2022). Pelinfluence melhe Diorama Telrtowards Be Resultsllearn Indonesianlsia Student Kellas III in Selelementary school. PE Scienceleducation, 2, 918-925.
Astuti, CY, Ts, HK, & Sarsono. (2022). PrelBe stationllearning in terms of Facilities, Motivation, Managementlmeln Time Bellearn selrta Neighborhood Toloutside. Dimeslnsi Peleducation and Pelmbellesson, 10, 24 – 32.
Habsyi, FY (2020). Pelaffect Be Facilitiesllearn Telfacing PrelBe stationlstudied Nusantara Tauro High School students. Pe Journalleducation and Eleconomy, 2, 13 - 22.
Hidayana, AF (2021). Pelinfluence Kellelcoverage of Be Facilitiesllearn Telrtowards Be Resultslstudy MatelMatika Student TolMI Nurul Ulum Madiun V welding. Paradigms, 11, 187 -201.
Ibda, H. (2022). Innovation Peleducation and PelmbelIndonesian language lessonslSia SelE Elementary schoollra Digital.Selmarang: PelrNational Library RelIndonesian publicldrain.
Khudriyah. (2021). MelPe todologylnelPe research and statisticsleducation.Malang: Madani.
Mortini, AV, Jaya, A., & Zam, MA (2023). Elxtelnding thelStudelnts' NarrativelTelxt Comprelhalnsion Through Relading SMART Protocol. Of ElEnglish Study Programl, 06, 216-225.
Ricardo, & Melilani, RI (2017). The Impact of Be's Interest and Motivationllearn Telrtowards Be ResultslLearn Students. PelManagement educationlmeln Peloffice, 2, 188-201.
Subakti, H., & Handayani, El. S. (2021). Pelinfluence Be's Guidancellearn telrtowards Be Resultsllearn Indonesianlsia Student Kellas High in Selelementary school. Basiceldu, 5, 247-255.
Sitirahayu, & Purnomo, H. (2021). Pelinfluence Be's facilitiesllearn Telfacing PrelBe stationllearn Students Selelementary school. Pe Science Scientific Journalleducation, 4, 164-168.
Sugiyono. (2019). MeltodelPelnelQuantitative Qualitative research.Bandung: Alphabelta.
Sumbayak, MA (2022). Pelaffect Be Facilitiesllearn Telrtowards Be Resultslstudents study at Kellas III SD Nelgelri 060938 Tolc. Meland Johor for the 2021/2022 Academic Year. Peleducation, Saintelk, Sociology and Law, 1, 1-15.
Susanto, A. (2019). Teloriginal Bellearn and Pelmbellessons in Selelementary school.Jakarta: PRElNADAMElHE'S A GROUP.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revi Mariska, Aswadi Jaya, Mega Prasrihamni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
