DIGITAL LEARNING MEDIA FOR DEAF STUDENTS IN LEARNING ENGLISH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v7i2.15547Keywords:
Learning Media, Digital, Deaf Students, Learning EnglishAbstract
Thus, this research aims to analyze the need for developing digital-based English learning media for deaf children. This qualitative research involved students and teachers at SLB-B Karya Ibu Palembang. A needs analysis was carried out to identify the sustainable situation of deaf children for the development of digital learning media for English lessons. Interview and observation techniques using two types of instruments in the form of interview guides, observation, and field notes were used to collect information about the English language learning needs of deaf students. Research findings identified several needs that underlie the development of digital learning materials for English lessons, namely inadequate English teachers, text-based teaching materials, and less than optimal teaching and learning processes because they are still textbook-based, while deaf students are visual learners. Therefore, the development of digital learning media is very necessary. One of the digital learning media that can be developed is E-books. By using e-books containing media such as pictures, animations, and videos, learning becomes more fun and easier for teachers and deaf students in teaching and learning English.
References
Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. (2007). Politik Bahasa dan Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakary
Andrew, K. N., Hoshooley, J., & Joanisse, M. F. (2014). Sign language ability in young deaf signers predicts comprehension of written sentences in English. PLoS ONE, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089994.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rine¬ka Cipta.
Dashtestani, R. (2013). Implementing mobile-assisted language learning (MALL) in an EFL context: Iranian EFL teachers’ perspectives on challenges and affordances. The JALT CALL Journal, 9(2), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v9n2.153.
Handayani S. Pentingnya Kemampuan Berbahasa Inggris Sebagai Dalam Menyongsong ASEAN Community 2015. Ikatan Sarjana Pendidikan Indonesia (ISPI) Jawa Tengah. 2016;3(1).
Ibrahim, H., Sihkabuden, S., & Kustiawan, U. (2000). Media Pembelajaran. Malang: Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang.
Jayanegara, I. N., Setiawan, I. N. A. F., & Putri, G. A. M. (2020). Design of interactive multimedia learning vocabulary for students communication disorder and deafness during the Covid-19 pandemic. IJDS: Indonesian Journal of Disability Studies, 7(2)
Kessler G. Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Lang Ann. 2018;51(1).
Kosasih, E. (2012). Cara Bijak Memahami Anak Berke¬butuhan Khusus. Bandung: Yrama Widya.
Laquintano, T. (2010). Sustained authorship: Digital writing, self-publishing, and the ebook. Written Communication, 27(4), 469–493.
Mardhotillah A, Desiningrum Dr. Hubungan Antara Parenting Selfefficacy Dengan Persepsi Terhadap Kompetensi Sosial Anak Tunarungu. Jurnal Empati. 2020;7(1).
Marzal, J. (2014, September). Desain Media Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Untuk Siswa Tunarungu Berbantuan Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi. Tekno-Pedagogi, 4(2), 32-44.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. London: Sage Publication, Inc.
Murni, W. (2007). Intervensi dini bagi anak tunarungu dalam pemerolehan bahasa. Jakarta: Dirjen DIKTI Depdiknas
Putri, S. S., Tampubolon, S. M., & Sukmanasa, E. (2018). Gaya Belajar Siswa Tunarungu Berprestasi. In Prosiding Seminar Dan Diskusi Pendidikan Dasar.
Septiawati D, Suryani N, Widyastono H. Penggunaan Game Edukasi Terhadap Kemampuan Kosakata Anak Tunarungu. Combines - Conference on Management, Business, Innovation, Education and Social Sciences. 2021;1(1).
Shadiev, R., & Yang, M. (2020). Review of studies on technology-enhanced language learning and teaching. Sustainability, 12(2), 524.
Sugiyono. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif and R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Tuah, T., Herman, N. D., & Maknun, J. (2019, February). E-books in teaching and learning process. In 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018) (Vol. 299, pp. 281-287). Atlantis Press.
Wehmeyer, M. L., Smith, S. J., Palmer, S. B., & Davies, D. K. (2004). Technology use by students with intellectual disabilities: An overview. Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(4), 7-21.
Yalman, M. (2015). Education faculty students' views about use of e-books. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 145-161.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Putra Pratama, Destia Dwi Mulyani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
