THE EFFECTS OF COOPERATIVE LEARNING METHOD AND LEARNING MOTIVATION: IMPROVING READING COMPREHENSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v8i1.16651Keywords:
Cooperative Learning, Learning Motivation, Reading ComprehensionAbstract
The purpose of this study was to look into how eighth-grade students at MTs. Negeri 2 Ogan Komering Ilir's cooperative learning and learning motivation strategies affected their reading comprehension skills. The study investigated the effects of two independent variables—methods and learning motivation—using a 2x2 factorial design (with two levels: high motivation and low motivation). Four different groups were created out of the participants: class without treatment-low motivation, class without treatment-high motivation, cooperative learning-low motivation, and cooperative learning-high motivation. Tests and questionnaires were used to gather information about the participants' reading comprehension abilities. The results showed that students with varying levels of learning desire, as well as those who participated in cooperative learning and attended class without receiving any instruction, had differing reading comprehension abilities. Nevertheless, it was not discovered that there was a statistically significant interaction between cooperative learning and learning motivation. These findings imply that although learning motivation and cooperative learning both have an independent impact on reading comprehension, their combined effect could not have a substantial effect on students' performance in this specific situation. The results advance our knowledge of how technique and student motivation interact to improve reading comprehension abilities.
References
Autila, R. (2017). Improving students’ writing skill of recount text through diary writing. Tell-Us Journal, 3(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.22202/tus.2017.v3i1.2527
Banditvilai, C. (2020). The effectiveness of reading strategies on reading comprehension. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 10(2), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2020.v10.1012
Brown, C., Schildkamp, K., &Hubers, M.(2017). Combining the best of two worlds: A conceptual proposal for evidence-informed school improvement. Educational Research, 59(2), 154–172.
Damayanti, E., Nur, F., Anggereni, S., & Taufiq, A. U. (2023). The effect of cooperative learning on learning motivation: A Meta-Analysis. Buletin Psikologi, 31(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.59583
Durriyah, R. (2018). The effectiveness of using small group discussion on students’ reading comprehension of recount text. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Fraenkel, J.R., et al. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York : McGraw-Hill.
Hayati, E. M., Purwanto, A., & Hidayat, D. R. (2023). Analysis of the cooperative learning effectiveness on students’ critical thinking skills in science learning for primary students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.994
Jaya, A. (2022). Exploring the Students' Speaking Ability based on their Different Personalities. Journal Esteem, 12.
Keshavarzi, A., & Nejad, S. G. (2015). The effect of cooperative learning on reading comprehension and reading anxiety of pre-university students. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(8), 169–180. www.jallr.com
Kesumawati Nila and Ichwan Aridanu. (2017). Statistik parametrik penelitian pendidikan. Palembang: Noer Fikri.
Klimova, B., & Zamborova, K. (2020). Use of mobile applications in developing reading comprehension in second language acquisition —A review study. Education Sciences, 10(12), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120391
Lesiana, N., Mulyadi, Aswadi Jaya, & Pratiwi, E. (2023). Classroom Interaction in Communicative Language Teaching of Secondary School. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 7(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v7i1.12661
Lestari, I. D. (2019). The implementation of small group discussion in teaching writing recount text for the tenth grade students of SMKN 1 Bendo. English Teaching Journal : A Journal of English Literature, Language and Education, 7(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.25273/etj.v7i1.4546
Mardliyah, N., Suryani, N., & Haryati, S. (2014). Perbedaan pengaruh cooperative learning tipe Think pair share ( Tps ) dan metode konvensional terhadap prestasi belajar mata pelajaran bahasa Inggris ditinjau dari motivasi belajar siswa kelas VIII pada MTs Negeri di kabupaten Kudus. 2(2).
Meniado, J. C. (2016). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation, and reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n3p117
Mustika, Y. (2020). Improving reading comprehension on recount text by using authentic material. ELTR Journal, 4(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.37147/eltr.v4i2.68
Nurwanti, N., Asrifan, A., & Haedar, H. (2019). The application of cooperative learning: Jigsaw II technique in improving students’ reading comprehension of expository text. Journal of Advanced English Studies, 2(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.47354/jaes.v2i1.52
Panggabean, E. D. (2022). The effect of using english authentic reading materials on the eighth grade students ’ reading comprehension achievement at SMP Negeri 1 Sidikalang. 2(1), 17–23.
Prihartanta, W. (2015). Teori-teori motivasi prestasi. Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, 1(83), 1–11.
Putri, A. D., Jaya, A., & Marleni, M. (2023). Exploring the Students’ Speaking Ability Based on Their Different Personalities. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v6i1.10203
Roufida, C. (2016). Investigating the importance of cooperative learning strategies to improve EFL learners’ reading comprehension skill. 2022–2023.
Richards, J. C.,& Schmidt, R. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching andapplied linguistics (4th ed.). Great Britain: Pearson Education Limited. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833835
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in languageteaching: A description and analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.
Rusman. (2014). Model-model pembelajaran: Mengembangkan profesionalisme guru. Rajawali Pers. Jakarta.
Saeed, B., & Gull, M. (2023). Effect of cooperative learning on elementary students’ reading comprehension in English. Pakistan languages and humanities review, 7(3), 338–351.
Sari, A., Jaya, A., Hermansyah, H., & Mortini, A. V. (2022). Using Mixidea Online Debating Strategy To Promote the Students’ Speaking Ability. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 5(2), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i2.8591
Senen, A., Sari, Y. P., Herwin, H., Rasimin, R., & Dahalan, S. C. (2021). The use of photo comics media: Changing reading interest and learning outcomes in elementary social studies subjects. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(5), 2300–2312. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i5.6337
Siller, H. S., & Ahmad, S. (2024). Analyzing the impact of collaborative learning approach on grade six students’ mathematics achievement and attitude towards mathemat. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14153
Sonia, A., & Fisher, H. (2016). Students’ reading techniques difficulties in recount text. Journal of English and Education, 4(2), 1–12.
Takaloo, N. M., & Ahmadi, M. R. (2017). The effect of learners’ motivation on their reading comprehension skill: A literature review. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(3), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.18869/acadpub.ijree.2.3.10
Thao, T. Q., &Long, N. H. C. (2021). English-majored students’ motivation in English language learning and their use of reading strategies: Research Perspectives. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(1), 109. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4661
Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(5), 1382–1414. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9
Yassin, A. A., Razak, N. A., & Maasun, T. N. R. (2018). Cooperative learning : general and theoretical background. 5(August), 642–654. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.58.5116
Yulianawati, I. (2019). An analysis of students’ difficulties in writing recount text (A case study at a senior high school in Indramayu). English Focus: Journal of English Language Education, 2(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.24905/efj.v2i1.48
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hayani, Tahrun, Mulyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
