LEARNERS' PERSPECTIVES ON USING THE FORVO WEBSITE AS A STRATEGY TO ENHANCE SPEAKING SKILLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v8i1.17084Keywords:
Forvo, Language Learning, Pronunciation, Learners’ Perspective.Abstract
This qualitative case study investigated learners’ perspectives on using the Forvo website to enhance their English-speaking skills within an online Discord community, "The English Hub." Data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and textual analysis of Discord conversations. Inductive thematic analysis revealed that students perceived Forvo as a valuable tool, aligning with Previous Research, Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory and TELL principles. Forvo facilitated social interaction, provided access to native speaker pronunciations (MKOs), and served as a cultural tool, promoting pronunciation improvement, confidence building, and vocabulary acquisition. Students reported significant improvements in their speaking skills, particularly in pronunciation, accent reduction, and fluency. Forvo effectively complemented traditional learning methods, offering authentic pronunciation models, a supportive online community, and a user-friendly interface. This study highlights the potential of Forvo to empower learners in their pursuit of English fluency
References
Abdelbaki, Z. (2023). The Role of Using ICTs’ in Enhancing EFL Learners’ Speaking Skill. Information and Communication Technology. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17804.69768
Alshumaimeri, Y. A., & Alhumud, A. M. (2021). EFL Students’ Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Virtual Classrooms in Enhancing Communication Skills. English Language Teaching, 14(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n11p80
Asratie, M. G., Wale, B. D., & Aylet, Y. T. (2023). Effects of using educational technology tools to enhance EFL students’ speaking performance. Education and Information Technologies, 28(8), 10031–10051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11562-y
Baniabdelrahman, A. A. (2013). Effect of Using Internet Tools on Enhancing EFL Students’ Speaking Skill. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 3(6).
Barnwell, D., O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1991). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Language, 67(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/415153
Bates, A. W. T. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age: Second Edition (2019) | teachonline.ca. Tony Bates Associates LTD.
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Longman.
Cook-Sather, A. (2002). Authorizing Students’ Perspectives: Toward Trust, Dialogue, and Change in Education. Educational Researcher, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X031004003
Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: “Student Voice” in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x
Crystal, D. (2018). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. In The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108528931
Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2022). The routledge handbook of second language acquisition and speaking. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Speaking. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022497
Diyyab, E. A. (2014). Using a Multimedia-Based Program for Developing Student Teachers’ EFL Speaking Fluency Skills., 25(99 P3). https://doi.org/10.12816/0021993
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Ethnologue. (2023). What is the most spoken language? https://www.ethnologue.com/insights/most-spoken-language/
Graddol, D. (2006). English Next.
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching fourth edition. In Longman (Vol. 17, Issue 3).
Hattie, J., & Yates, G. C. R. (2013). Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. In Visible Learning and the Science of How We Learn. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315885025
Heil, C. R., Wu, J. S., Lee, J. J., & Schmidt, T. (2016). A Review of Mobile Language Learning Applications: Trends, Challenges, and Opportunities. The EuroCALL Review, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2016.6402
Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science and Medicine, 292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523
Hermansyah, H. (2021). Self Talk Strategy in Improving the Eleventh Grade Students’ Speaking Ability. Jurnal Smart, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.52657/js.v7i1.1331
Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5
Holmes, J., & Wilson, N. (2022). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, Sixth Edition. In An Introduction to Sociolinguistics, Sixth Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367821852
Hyland, K. (2007). English for academic purposes: an advanced resource book. Miscelánea: A Journal of English and American Studies, 35.
Jaya, A., Hermansyah, & Rosmiyati, E. (2019). Redefining Project Based Learning In English Class. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 2 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v2i2.2423
Kurnia Asih, F., Jaya, A., & Theriana, A. (2021). An Analysis of English-Speaking Activity for Introvert Learners’ Necessity. In English Community Journal (Vol. 5, Issue 2).
L. S. Vygotsky. (2020). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In Accounting in Australia (RLE Accounting).
Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student Writing in Higher Education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
Lucas, S. E., & Stob, P. (2020). Public Speaking.
Magolda, M. B. B., & Parks, S. D. (2023). Authoring Your Life: Developing Your Internal Voice to Navigate Life’s Challenges. In Authoring Your Life: Developing Your Internal Voice to Navigate Life’s Challenges. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003443148
Mambu, J. G. Z., Pitra, D. H., Rizki, A., Ilmi, M., Nugroho, W., Leuwol, N. V, Muh, A., & Saputra, A. (2023). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Artificial Intelligence (AI) Dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Mengajar Guru di Era Digital. Journal on Education, 06(01).
Merentika Arianda, S., Jaya, A., & Theriana, A. (2023). EFL (English as a Foreign Language) Students’ Perception About the Effectiveness of Learning Reading by Using Electronic Books. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v6i2.12322
Miao, Fengchun., Holmes, Wayne., Huang, Ronghuai., Zhang, Hui., & Unesco. (n.d.). AI and education : Guidance for policymakers.
Moore, M. T., & Zancanella, D. (2014). What Every Teacher Should Know. Talking Points, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.58680/tp201425152
Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education (updated). Berkeley, CA, and Los Angeles: University of California Press (Original Work Published 1984).
Remland, M. S. (2020). Nonverbal Communication in Everyday Life. In Nonverbal Communication in Everyday Life. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483399447
Sari, A., Jaya, A., Hermansyah, H., & Mortini, A. V. (2022). Using Mixidea Online Debating Strategy To Promote the Students’ Speaking Ability. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 5(2), 298–303. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i2.8591
Seidman, I. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. In Teachers College Press (Vol. 58, Issue 12).
Selwyn, N. (2011). Education & Technology. Key Issues & Debates. In Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology. https://doi.org/3636620
Sosas, R. V. (2021). Technology in teaching speaking and its effects to students learning English. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.52462/jlls.66
Syapitri Ovi, Herlina, & Hermansyah. (2023). The Implementation of Grammarly Application as a Tool to Improve Students’ Writing Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.31571/bahasa.v12i1.4365
Turula, A. (2016). What the good (digital) language learner can teach us? Teaching English with Technology, 16(3).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alwan Ammar Zaki, Hermansyah, Aswadi Jaya
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
