THE EFFECT OF USING QUIZIZZ APPLICATION AS AN ENGLISH LEARNING EXERCISE IN VOCABULARY MASTERY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v8i1.17906Keywords:
Vocabulary Mastery, Quizizz Application, English Learning ExerciseAbstract
This study aims to examine the impact of the Quizizz application on vocabulary mastery as part of English learning exercises among tenth-grade students at SMK Negeri 2 Panyabungan, focusing on recount text topics. It addresses challenges such as limited vocabulary mastery, low motivation and interest in learning English, and insufficient opportunities for practice. A quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design was employed, involving experimental and control classes. Data collection included pre-tests, treatments, and post-tests using 20 multiple-choice questions on recount texts. The findings revealed that the experimental class, which used Quizizz, had a higher average post-test score (82) compared to the control class (67.5). Data analysis using the t-test showed a t-count of 4.965 and a sig. tailed (p) score of 0.001, with α = 0.05 and degrees of freedom (df) = 19. Since p < α (0.001 < 0.05), the alternative hypothesis was accepted, and the null hypothesis was rejected. These results indicate that using the Quizizz application significantly enhances students’ vocabulary mastery compared to traditional teaching methods. The study highlights the effectiveness of Quizizz in addressing vocabulary and engagement issues in English learning.
References
Adam, D. (2020). Penggunaan Aplikasi Quizizz dalam Mata kuliahVocabullary Building: Masalah dan Solusi. The GIST Jurnal Sastra Dan Bahasa, 3(2), 1–23.
Annisa, R., & Erwin, E. (2021). Pengaruh Penggunaan Aplikasi Quizizzz terhadap Hasil Belajar IPASiswa di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(5), 3660–3667.
Anshori,M., & Iswati,S.(2009). Buku ajar metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Air langga University Press.
Asti, A. (2022). The using of Quizizz application to improve students’ vocabulary of the tenth grade students of SMA Negeri 13 Pangkep (Pre experimental research). https://digilibadmin.unismuh.ac.id/upload/11002-Full_Text.pdff
BAL, Samet. (2018). Using Quizizz.com To Enhance Pre-intermediate students Vocabulary Knowledge. International Journal of Language Academy, 6(September), 295±303.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2004. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education.
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching Language To Young Learners. Cambridge University Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspect of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Creswell,J.W.(2014). Research design qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches (Fourth). Sage Publication.
Crystal, D. 2000. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language 3rd (Third) edition. Cambridge University Press
Hamalik, Oemar. 2005. Perencanaan Pengajaran Berdasarkan Pendekatan Sistem. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Hughes, Arthur. 1989. Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge University Press
Kern, Richard. Literacy and Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University
Lesiana, N., Mulyadi, Aswadi Jaya, & Pratiwi, E. (2023). Classroom Interaction in Communicative Language Teaching of Secondary School. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 7(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v7i1.12661
Misbah, Ulhusna. (2012)YPTK Padang. “Sosialisasi Quizizz Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Digital Pada Masa Pandemi.” Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 1(2), 2797–345.
Mujis,D.(2004). Doing quantitative research. Athenaeum Press.
Muttaqien,F.(2017). Penggunaan media audio-visual dan aktivitas belajar dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar vocabulary siswa pada mata pelajaran bahasa inggris kelas x (Quasy experiment: SMAN 8 Garut). Jurnal Wawasan Ilmiah, 8(1), 25-41.
Nation, P. 2005. “Paul‟s vocabulary resources Accesed on 6th of November 2014.
Nation, P. 2012. “Vocabulary Size Test Information and Specification”.Accessed on 6th of November 2014.
Nunan, David. (1983). Language Learning Strategy. Sidney: Prince Hall International.
Pujiasih, Erna. “Membangun Generasi Emas Dengan Variasi Pembelajaran Online Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19.”Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru 5(1), 2020.
Purnomo, E., Jermaina, N., Marheni, E., Gumilar, A., Widarsa, A. H., Elpatsa, A., & Abidin, N. E. Z. (2024). Enhancing Problem-Solving Skills Through Physical Education Learning: A Comprehensive Analysis. Retos, 58, 435–444. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v58.106838
Putri, A. D., Jaya, A., & Marleni, M. (2023). Exploring the Students’ Speaking Ability Based on Their Different Personalities. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v6i1.10203
Resnick, Halliday. 1985. Physics, 3rd Edition (Fisika Jilid 1 Edisi Ketiga). Penerjemah: Pantur Silaban Ph.D dan Drs. Erwin Sucipto M.Sc. Jakarta :Erlangga.
Seyfried, Karin. (2012). E-Learning. [Online] Tersedia: https://www.uibk.ac.at/psychologie/mitarbeiter/leidlmair/elearning_forscngseminar.pdf (Diakses 6 Januari 2021)
Sodiq, M., Mahfud, H., &Adi, F. P. (2021).“Persepsi Guru dan Peserta Didik Terhadap Penggunaan Aplikasi Berbasis Web "Quizizz" Sebagai Media.
Solikah, H. (2020). Pengaruh penggunaan media pembelajaran interaktif quizizz terhadap motivasi dan hasil belajar siswa pada materiteks persuasive kelas VIII di SMPN 5 Sidoarjo tahun pelajaran 2019/2020. Jurnal Mahasiswa UNESA, 7(3), 1–8.
Sugiyono, S. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Cet. I, Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Cet. XXVV; Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suharsono, A. (2020). The Use of Quizizz and Kahoot! In The Training for Millennial Generation. Journal International Educatio Indonesian, 4(2), 332–342.
Surayya, Elly.2012. Pengaruh Media dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal At- Ta’lim 3, 65-72.
Swarniti, N. W. (2021). Efektivitas Penggunaan Aplikasi Quizizzz Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Bagi Mahasiswa. Seminar Nasional Teknologi Pembelajaran, 133–144.
Syafitri, W. (2023). Learning Experiences in Small Group Discussions in the Third Semester of English Education Students. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 11(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v11i1.6339
Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). Grading and differentiation: Paradox or good practice? Theory into Practice, 44(3), 262–269. Pembelajaran di Sekolah Dasar” Didaktika Dwija Indria, 9(5).
Yazdi, A., Nawaser, K., Pezeshgi, S., Mohsenifard, H., & Golamian, E. (2024). Artificial intelligence in social sustainability: A bibliometric and content analysis-based review. Multidisciplinary Reviews. https://malque.pub/ojs/index.php/mr/article/view/3705
Zhao, F. (2019).Using Quizizz to integrate fun multiplayer activity in the accounting classroom. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(1).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Apriyanti Hasibuan, Syamsiah Depalina, Nursaidah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
