A PORTRAIT OF TEACHERS IN TEACHING TOEFL READING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v8i1.18257Keywords:
Reading skills, Main idea, Portrait, TOEFL, TeachingAbstract
The purpose of this study was to design a TOEFL preparation program for the Rethorica Class of St. Paulus Minor Seminary Palembang, aimed at improving reading skills essential for post-high school education and English proficiency in today's disruptive era. The program, which lasted for 7 days, involved 27 seminarians and integrated lectures, exercises, tests, and discussions. It included pre- and post-tests to measure progress, along with a questionnaire to gather feedback. The reading skills targeted were main idea identification, text organization, direct and indirect question answering. Results showed a significant improvement, as evidenced by a higher score in the post-test compared to the pre-test. Inference statistics revealed a significance value of 0.005, indicating meaningful change. The questionnaire results confirmed that the program effectively supported TOEFL reading skills development. This study offers insights for improving TOEFL preparation programs in seminaries and similar institutions, emphasizing structured training methods to enhance reading skills and test-taking strategies. The originality of this research lies in its focus on seminarians and its empirical evidence of the positive impact of tailored, short-term TOEFL training on their English proficiency.
References
Almulla, M. A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Project-Based Learning (PBL) Approach as a Way to Engage Students in Learning. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020938702
Anastasi, A. (1981). Coaching, test sophistication, and developed abilities. American Psychologist, 36(10), 1086–1093.
Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255-291). New York: Longman, Inc.
Ang-zie, K. (2015). 10 exams in preparation & practice exam TOEFL. Surabaya: Genta Group Production.
Badu, H. (2020). Students’ ability in reading TOEFL. Jambura Journal of English Teaching and Literature, 1(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.37905/jetl.v1i2.7288.
Belouiza, O., Er-Rechydy, A., & Koumachi, B. (2024). Prior knowledge Activation through the use of Effective Reading Strategies. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijels.93.49.
Benedick, K. (2021). TOEFL IBT reading section: How To Master NEW TOEFL IBT Reading 2020: TOEFL Test Prep. Independently Published.
Boudah, D. (2018). Evaluation of Intensive Reading Strategies Intervention for Low-Performing Adolescents with and without Learning Disabilities. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 15(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v7i1.239%0Ahttps://jele.or.id/index.php/jele/article/view/239
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Carter, J. (2023). Supporting preservice teachers to become informed teachers of reading through one-to-one tutoring in an English initial teacher education setting. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 51(4), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2021.1985578
Center, Y. (2020). Beginning Reading : A balanced approach to literacy instruction in the first three years of schoo (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003115014
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Pearson Education, Inc.
Education Testing Service (ETS). (2001). TOEFL test and core manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Fadilah, I. A., Jaya, A., & Uzer, Y. (2023). Visual Representation and Comprehension: the Exploration of Multimodal Text To Energize Reading of the Tenth Grade Students’ At State Vocational High School 5 of Palembang. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(1), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v6i1.10226
Fitriyah, I., & Jannah, M. (2021). Online Assessment Effect in EFL Classroom: An Investigation on Students and Teachers’ Perceptions. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 5(2), 265. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i2.709
Fitria, T. N. (2024). Question types on reading comprehension in TOEFL test: An implication in teaching reading TOEFL to students. Journal of English and Education (JEE), 10(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.20885/jee.v10i1.33363.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. h. (2014). How To Design And Evaluate Research In Education (Eighth Edi). McGraw-Hill Education.
Girsang, A. L., Marbun, F. V. G., Turnip, Y. A. M., & Saragih, E. 2019. An analysis of reading comprehension difficulties in TOEFL test by high school students. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA) Journal, 3(1), 132-135. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v3i1.1002.
Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Hill, Y. Z., & Liu, O. L. (2012). Is there any interaction between background knowledge and language proficiency that affects TOEFL iBT reading performance. Retrieved from TOEFL iBT Research Report website: http://144.81.87.152/Media/Research/pdf/RR-12-22.pdf.
Lesiana, N., Mulyadi, Aswadi Jaya, & Pratiwi, E. (2023). Classroom Interaction in Communicative Language Teaching of Secondary School. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 7(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v7i1.12661
Liu, O. L. (2014). Investigating the relationship between test preparation and TOEFL iBT performance (Research Report No. RR-14-15). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12016.
Marhaeni, A. (2016). Rosenblatt's transactional theory and its implementation in the teaching of integrated reading. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5. https://doi.org/10.17977/jip.v5i4.1052.
Muhtar, I. Y., Pammu, A., & Nasmilah, N. (2021). Students’ Perceptions of The Use Of ‘TELL’ in English Learning Process in Bosowa University Makassar. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 4(4), 474–484. https://doi.org/10.34050/elsjish.v4i4.19116
Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: A need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52, 439-481. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00189.
Nazri, M. A., Wijaya, H., & Zainurrahman. (2020). EFL students’ ability in answering TOEFL reading comprehension section. Journal of Physics Conference Series 1539:012044, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1539/1/012044
Nobutoshi, M. (2023). Metacognition and Reflective Teaching: A Synergistic Approach to Fostering Critical Thinking Skills. Research and Advances in Education, 2(9), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.56397/rae.2023.09.01
Raihana, M. (2022). Students’ barriers in answering reading section of TOEFL (Thesis, UIN AR-RANIRY Banda Aceh). https://repository.ar-raniry.ac.id/id/eprint/24617/1/Muna%20Raihana,%20180203068,%20FTK,%20PBI,%20087728616715.pdf
Rao, P. S. (2019). The Importance of Speaking Skills in English Classrooms. Alford Council of International English & Literature Journal(ACIELJ), 401(2), 6–18.
Samad, I. A., Jannah, M., & Fitriani, S. S. (2017). EFL students' strategies dealing with common difficulties in TOEFL reading comprehension section. International Journal of Language Education, 1(1) 29-36. https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v1i1.2869.
Sari, D. M. M., & Wardhani, A. K. (2020). Critical thinking as learning and innovation skill in the 21st century. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 3(2), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v3i2.8778
Seminari Menengah St. Paulus (2014). Buku pedoman formatio. Palembang: Seminari Menengah St. Paulus.
Tristiana, N. E., Hartono, R., Faridi, A., & Fitriati, S. W. (2024). ICT-based Classroom Instruction Design: Exploring EFL Pre-Service Teachers’ Perception of Project-Based Learning Strategy for Developing Pedagogical Competence. Teaching English Language, 18(2), 347–378. https://doi.org/10.22132/tel.2024.459941.1620
Xiao, W. (2016). Schema Theory, Construction-integration reading model and Reading Pedagogy. 185-189. https://doi.org/10.2991/AMAHS-16.2016.38.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yohanes Heri Pranoto, Anselmus Inharjanto, Ega Leovani, Catharina Clara, Florentinus Heru Ismadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
