THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DIGITAL READING ACTIVITY, READING ENGAGEMENT, AND READING COMPREHENSION AMONG EFL LEARNERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/0m5p7v56Keywords:
digital reading activity, reading engagement, reading comprehension, EFL learners, digital literacyAbstract
The growth of digital technology has changed the way students read, learn, and interact with English texts. In many EFL classrooms, reading is no longer limited to printed books because students increasingly access materials through smartphones, laptops, and online platforms. This shift gives learners wider exposure to authentic texts, yet it also introduces new demands related to navigation, attention control, and strategic reading. In such contexts, reading comprehension is shaped not only by students’ access to digital texts but also by how actively they engage with what they read. This study examined the relationship between digital reading activity, reading engagement, and reading comprehension among eleventh-grade EFL learners. A quantitative correlational design was used. Data were collected through a digital reading activity questionnaire, a reading engagement questionnaire, and a reading comprehension test, then analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple regression. The findings show that digital reading activity was positively and significantly related to reading comprehension. Reading engagement also had a positive and significant relationship with comprehension. In addition, both variables simultaneously contributed to students’ reading comprehension performance. These findings suggest that digital reading becomes more academically meaningful when it is accompanied by active emotional, behavioral, and cognitive engagement during reading.
References
Al-Seghayer, K. (2023). The emerging digital-reading practices of EFL learners and their perceptions of the effects on various aspects of L2 reading. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 23(2), 154–176.
Banditvilai, C. (2020). The effectiveness of reading strategies on reading comprehension. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 10(2), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2020.10.2.1012
Blikstad-Balas, M., & Roe, A. (2020). The interplay between digital and paper-based reading practices. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 15(1), 43–60.
Catone, K. (2021). Digital literacy and online reading comprehension: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 65(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1183
Chang, C.-W., Hsu, C.-Y., & Wu, S.-F. (2022). Academic digital reading behavior and learning outcomes: The role of self-regulation and digital motivation. Computers & Education, 188, 104570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104570
Chen, M. R. A., Hwang, G. J., Lin, Y. H., Abou-Khalil, V., Li, H., & Ogata, H. (2022). A reading engagement-promoting strategy to facilitate EFL students’ mobile learning achievement, behaviour and engagement. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 16(4), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2022.125968
Chen, X., Fan, Y., & He, J. (2022). The effect of digital text features on students’ reading engagement and comprehension: Evidence from a quasi-experimental study. Computers in Human Behavior, 129, 107146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107146
Chicco, D., & Jurman, G. (2021). The coefficient of determination R² is more informative and truthful than other metrics. Scientific Reports, 11, 23927. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99258-5
Coiro, J. (2021). Toward a multifaceted heuristic of digital reading to inform assessment, research, practice, and policy. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.302
Demir, S. (2022). Comparison of normality tests in terms of sample sizes. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(2), 397–409. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1038428
Dufva, H., & Pusa, T. (2020). Rethinking literacy in the digital age: Multimodal and multilingual meaning making. In EDULEARN20 Proceedings (pp. 4327–4335).
Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1993
Elleman, A. M., & Oslund, E. L. (2019). Reading comprehension research: Implications for practice and policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732218816339
Fadardi, J. S., & Azizi, M. (2020). The contribution of reading emotions to reading comprehension: The mediating effect of reading engagement using a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Research in Reading, 43(4), 547–564.
Fajhira, Z., Putri, S., & Damayanti, I. L. (2025). Pleasure reading, better understanding: A young EFL learner’s journey in digital extensive reading. Journal of English Language and Literature Teaching, 10(2), 153–181.
Gambrell, L. B. (2011). Seven rules of engagement: What’s most important to know about motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 65(3), 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/TRTR.01024
Gao, J. (2024). R-squared (R²) and model interpretation in quantitative research. Research Methods in Education, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843231186398
Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2022). Engagement and motivation for reading. In E. L. Baker & D. H. Gitomer (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 75–93). Springer.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2022). Engagement in reading: Processes, practices, and policy implications. In Handbook of reading research (Vol. 5, pp. 311–329). Routledge.
Huang, T., & Chen, S. (2020). Digital reading strategies and reading comprehension in EFL contexts. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 22–40.
Kim, J. S., Boyle, A., Levine, A., & Woolley, M. E. (2019). Exploring heterogeneity in the relationship between reading engagement and reading comprehension by achievement level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 710–734.
Kurniasih, N., & Aldino, R. (2022). Reading comprehension in EFL: An overview. Journal of Language and Literature Education, 8(2), 145–159.
Mete, E. (2020). Examining the role of reading engagement in EFL learners’ reading comprehension. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(2), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.707259
Naumann, J. (2022). Online reading comprehension: Cognitive processes and individual differences. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1809896
Noori, A. (2025). Enhancing EFL reading instruction with digital tools: Effects on comprehension, vocabulary, and engagement. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 20(1), 99–115.
Noori, M. (2025). Digital reading and EFL comprehension: The mediating role of metacognitive regulation. Computers & Education, 198, 104780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2025.104780
Nurfaizah, D., Erniyati, Y., & Pranata, O. D. (2024). EFL students’ reading habits in the digital era. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 17(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.24042/ee-jtbi.v17i2.22564
Pardede, P., Rafli, Z., & Iskandar, I. (2023). Indonesian EFL learners’ digital reading habits. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 7(3), 459–479. https://doi.org/10.33369/jeet.7.3.459-479
Pardede, P., Widodo, H., & Mulyono, H. (2023). Digital extensive reading and vocabulary exposure among Indonesian EFL learners. Teaching English with Technology, 23(1), 22–44.
Reiber-Kuijpers, A., Kral, M., & Meijer, P. (2021). Digital reading in a second or foreign language: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 163, 104115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104115
Schmid, R. F., Bernard, R. M., & Borokhovski, E. (2021). The role of digital text features in reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 34, 100409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100409
Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348
Zhu, X., & Sabir, F. (2024). The mediating role of reading engagement between digital reading activity and reading comprehension among high school learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 145, 107846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107846
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Selfiah Anggraini Pratiwi, Indawan Syahri, Masagus Firdaus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
