EXPLORING THE DEVELOPMENT OF ENGLISH WRITING SKILLS AMONG SUCCESSFUL EFL SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS: A QUALITATIVE CASE STUDY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/mnm3ae14Keywords:
EFL Writing, Successful Learners, Writing Strategies, Senior High School Students.Abstract
English writing is considered one of the most difficult skills for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, although some students achieve excellent writing proficiency despite learning in a non-English-speaking environment. This study explored how successful senior high school students developed their English writing skills. Using a qualitative case study design, the research was conducted at SMA Katolik Santo Petrus Kanisius Palangka Raya, Indonesia. The participants consisted of ten purposively selected Grade XI students with strong writing performance and one English teacher as a supporting informant. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis, and analyzed using Braun and Clarke’s thematic analysis. The findings revealed four key practices that supported writing development: planning through brainstorming and outlining, applying multiple learning strategies such as reading, digital resources, and vocabulary building, engaging in regular writing practice with persistence and positive attitudes, and improving writing through self-editing and teacher feedback. These interconnected practices enhanced students’ organization, language accuracy, vocabulary, and overall writing quality. The study highlights that successful writing development results from the integration of cognitive, behavioral, and reflective processes, emphasizing the importance of process-oriented writing instruction in EFL classrooms.
References
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2024). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity, 59, 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
Al-Seghayer, K. (2024). Pragmatic competence in Saudi EFL learners: Challenges, consequences, and strategies for overcoming barriers. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 12(1), 209. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v12i1.22438
Anggara, Y. R., & Yulistianti, H. D. (2025). The effect of project-based learning on students' motivation to learn English in MTs As-Syafi'iyah Kalongan. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 11(2), 198–209. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v11i2.7289
Arochman, T., Margana, M., Ashadi, A., Achmad, S., Nugrahaeni, D. A., & Baihaqi, I. (2024). The effect of project-based learning on English writing skill for EFL learners. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(2), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202423961
Baleghizadeh, S., & Maryam, B. (2019). The effect of summary writing on reading comprehension: The role of mediation in EFL classroom. New England Reading Association Journal, 47(1), 44–48.
Bora, P. (2023). Importance of writing skill to develop students’ communication skill. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 7(35), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.54850/jrspelt.7.35.009
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Conceptual and design thinking for thematic analysis. Qualitative Psychology, 9(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cronin, M., Hubbard, V., Cline, T. A., Jr., & Frost, P. (2020). Combatting professional burnout through creative writing. Clinics in Dermatology, 38(5), 512–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2020.05.004
De Wilde, V., Brysbaert, M., & Eyckmans, J. (2020). Learning English through out-of-school exposure: Which levels of language proficiency are attained and which types of input are important? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 23(1), 171–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001062
Fahmi, S., & Rachmijati, C. (2021). Improving students’ writing skill using Grammarly application for second grade in senior high school. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 4(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v4i1.p69-74
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387.
Hubert, C., Bonnardel, N., & Frey, A. (2025). Effects of daily creative writing practice at school on the cognitive development of children from disadvantaged socio-economic backgrounds. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 58, Article 101881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101881
Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., & Van den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students' peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
Imamuddin, I., Abdullah, W., & Muhyin, F. I. M. (2023). The application of the mind mapping method in improving student learning achievement in Madrasah Diniyah. Molang: Journal Islamic Education, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.32806/jm.v1i2.621
Inayatulloh, S., Dunggio, A. R. S., Nurjanis, N., & Bangun, E. U. P. B. (2023). Creative teaching strategies to improve achievement and motivation of higher education students in Indonesia. At-Tasyrih: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Hukum Islam, 9(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.55849/attasyrih.v9i1.204
Isgiarno, Y. C., Cahyono, B. Y., & Rahmaningtyas, H. (2020). Increasing EFL students’ writing skill using Jigsaw and online searching strategy. IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 7(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v7i1.16383
Jaja. (2024). Research trends on students’ writing skills: A bibliometric analysis using Scopus database. Journal of Language and Education, 10(3), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2024.18806
Kemendikbud. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Panduan implementasi literasi bahasa Inggris di sekolah menengah. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Khudaverdiyeva, T. (2025). The importance of writing in language acquisition: A cognitive, communicative, and pedagogical perspective. Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities, 2(3), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.69760/gsrh.0203025014
Makwana, D., Engineer, P., Dabhi, A., & Chudasama, H. (2023). Sampling methods in research: A review. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 7(3), 762–768.
Memon, M. A., Thurasamy, R., Ting, H., & Cheah, J.-H. (2024). Purposive sampling: A review and guidelines for quantitative research. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.9(1)01
Mohammadzadeh, A., Ahour, T., & Saeidi, M. (2020). A sociocultural perspective on second language writing: The effect of symmetrical versus asymmetrical scaffolding on intermediate EFL learners’ writing accuracy, fluency, and complexity and their attitudes. Education Research International, 2020, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/5292356
Mohinur, A. (2024). Project-based learning as a creative and innovative way of teaching English as a foreign language. University Research Base, 54–60.
Nadiyah, H., Hermansyah, H., & Kartikasari, D. (2023). Transcribing tourism cultural content video to enrich students’ reading materials. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(2), 257–269. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v6i2.12325
Ningrum, R. W., Hamamah, H., Sahiruddin, S., & Rohmah, Z. (2023). Academic writing difficulties for Indonesian students in pursuing postgraduate studies abroad. Journal of English Education and Applied Linguistics, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v12i1.5271
Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. McGraw-Hill.
Nunan, D. (2023). Practical English language teaching: Young learners. McGraw-Hill.
Oeun, S., & Heng, K. (2025). Challenges Cambodian students face in English essay writing: A literature review. Journal of Education Research, 6(2), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.37985/jer.v6i2.2476
Pratama, G. Y., Haruna, J., & M. Siddik. (2020). Pengembangan bahan ajar menulis puisi dengan perpaduan model demonstrasi dan teknik beriur kata kelas VIII SMP. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 3(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v3i2.58
Priyadi, A. T., Dwi, I., Wati, P., Amir, A., Gover, T., Ringo, S., Gatot, Y., Yuliana, S., Khory, F. D., Auliya, D., Ghasya, V., & Haetemi, M. (2024). How are motor skills and writing readiness in children? A literature review. Retos, 61, 141–147. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v61.109558
Soughati, N., El Hadi, K., & Flyura, A. (2025). Technopedagogical making workshop and writing/programming. XLinguae, 18(1), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2025.18.01.12
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.50.1.158
Syarif, I. R., Cahyono, B. Y., & Setyowati, L. (2025). Exploring learner contexts and influencing factors in language learning strategy research: A systematic literature review. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 14(3), 5201–5218. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.2891
Teng, M. F., Qin, C., & Wang, C. (2022). Validation of metacognitive academic writing strategies and the predictive effects on academic writing performance in a foreign language context. Metacognition and Learning, 17(1), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09278-4
Teng, M. F., & Wang, C. (2023). Assessing academic writing self-efficacy belief and writing performance in a foreign language context. Foreign Language Annals, 56(1), 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12638
Xie, F. (2025). Dynamic evolutionary mechanisms of L2 Chinese writing ability: A multifactor interaction effect study of writing anxiety, motivation and metacognition. Acta Psychologica, 261, Article 105692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105692
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Zhou, Q., Chen, L., & Hou, X. (2022). Exploring Chinese EFL undergraduates’ writing from sources: Self-efficacy and performance. Assessing Writing, 54, Article 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100663
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tri Aprilia Suciati, Maria Arina Luardini, Natalina Asi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
