THE INFLUENCE OF WHIP AROUND TECHNIQUE TOWARD WRITING DESCRIPTIVE PARAGRAPH OF THE TENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF STATE SENIORHIGH SCHOOL 4 OF PALEMBANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v3i2.4542Abstract
The objective of this study was to find out whether or not there is any significant influenceon student’s achievement in writing descriptive paragraph tothe tenth grade students of State Senior High School 4 Palembang who are taught through Whip Around Technique and those who are not. Thi study applied quasi-experiment method with nonequivalent control group design. The population of this study was all of the tenth grade students of State Senior High School 4 of Palembang, in the Academic Year 2018/2019 with total number 320 students and 64 students were taken as sample in experimental and control group. In collecting the data, a written test of descriptive paragraph was used, and the data were analyzed by using SPSS 22. The result of this study showed that experimental group students’ average score in pretest was 64.37 and in posttest it was 77.93 while in control group, students’ average score in pretest was 64.53 and in posttest it was 66.78. The value t-obtained was (11.392) which was higher than the value of t-table (2.000) at the significant level 0.05 in two tailed test with 62 (df). It was assumed that the null hypothesis (H0) was rejected, and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It means that there was significant influenceon student’s achievement in writing descriptive paragraph tothe tenth grade students of State Senior High School 4of Palembang who were taught through Whip Around Technique. Keywords: Teaching, Writing, Descriptive Text, Whip AroundÂ
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
References
Ary, Donald, Lucy C.J, Asghar R, & Christine K.S. 2010. Introduction to Research in Education. Canada: Wadsworth.
Brown, H.Douglas. 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. NY: Pearson Longman.
Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, Keith Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education, 6th Ed. USA & Canada: Routledge.
Fisher, Douglas, Nancy Frey. 2007. Cheking for Understanding: Formative Assessment Techniques for Your Classroom. USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Fraenkel, Jack R, Norman E Wallen, Hellen H Hyun, 2012. How to Design and EvaluateResearch in Education, 8th Ed.NewYork:Springer International.
Gage, Dr. Nathaniel L. 2009. A Conception of Teaching, US: Springer.
Gay, L.R., Mills, Geoffrey. E., Airasian, P. 2012. Educational Research: competencies for Analysis and Application Tenth Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Harmin, Merrill, Melanie Toth. 2006. Inspiring Active Learning: A Complete Handbook for Today’s Teachers, 2nd Edition. USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).
Hatch, A, and Anne Lazaraton.1991. The Research Manual: Design and Statisticsfor Applied Linguistics. Massachusetts: Heinle&Heinle Publishers,A Division of Wadsworth, Inc.
Heaton, J. B. (1990). Writing English Language Test.New York: United Stated of American: Longman, inc.
Hyland, Ken. 2003. Second Language Writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marshak, David. 2001. Improving Teaching in the High School Block Period. USA: A Division of Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Muawanah, Aliatul. 2018. Teaching Writing Descriptive Text by Using Guided Writing Technique at The First Semester of The Tenth Grade of Ma Mathlaul Anwar Kecapi Padang CerminKabupatenPesawaran. Thesis.Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty RadenIntan State Islamic University Lampung.
Oshima, Alice and Ann Hogue. 2006. The Longman Academic Writing Series, Level 3: Introduction to Academic Writing, 3rd Ed, New York: Pearson Longman.
Paxton, Ellen. 2019. Professional Learning Board: What is the Whip Around Strategy. Retrieved from http://k12teacherstaffdevelopment.com/tlb/what-is-the-whip-around-strategy/
Richard et al. 2005. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and- Applied Linguistics, 4th Ed, Great Britain: Pearson Education Limited.
Saleh, Yuslizal.1997. Method of TEFL in Indonesian Context Book 1,Unpublished Manuscript. Palembang: Indralaya FKIP UniversitasSriwijaya.
Sugiyono. 2013. MethodePenelitianPendidikan (PendekatanKuantitatif, Kualitatifdan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta Bandung.
Taylor, Gordon. 2009. A student's writing guide: how to plan and write successful essays. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Utami, Tori Ana Ari. 2014. Improving the Ability in Writing Descriptive Texts through Brainstorming Technique for Grade Viii Students AtSmp N 1 Piyungan. Thesis.English Language Education Department Faculty of Languages and Arts Yogyakarta State University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.