• Inggit Ayu Fadilah State Vocational High School 5 of Palembang
  • Aswadi Jaya Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Yuspar Uzer Universitas PGRI Palembang



Multimodal Text, Reading, Visual Representation and Comprehension


Reading is a critical English ability for students to attain develop master to examine English, it is crucial to the destiny of students who want to be better degrees of studying. This study was aimed at finding out the exploration of multimodal text to energize reading with visual representation and comprehension. This study used a qualitative descriptive method. The data in this study were, observation, documentation and questionnaire. Based on the result of questionnaire in graph of pie, it was found that 53% of students answered fully agree and 39% of 35 students answered agree, so it can be concluded a students to give the positive perception about multimodal text as a media to energize their reading, and it can be conclude that the tenth grade students of State Vocational High School 5 of Palembang has positive perception. So students can enjoy and explore the multimodal text with their own choices.


Arikunto., S. (2014), Prosedure Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.

Burhanuddin (1997), Logika Materiil Filsafat Ilmu Pengetahuan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Cahyaningati, D. (2018), The Use Multimodal Text in Enhancing Engineering Students’ Reading Skill. International Journal of Language Education,Vol.2 No.2 pp. 65-73, Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Cahyono, B. Y. and Mukminatien, N. 2011. Techniques and Strategies to Enhance English Language Learnimg, Malang. University of Malang Press.

Callow, J., & Zammit, K. (2012). ‘Where lies your text?’: Engaging high school students from low socio-economic backrounds in reading multimodal texts. English in Australia, 47(2), 69-77.

Chan, E. (2010). Integrating visual and verbal meaning in multimodal text comprehension: Towards a Model of Inter-Modal Relations. Semiotic Margins: Meaning in Multimodalities, 144-167.

Chan, E., & Unsworth, L. (2011). Image– language interaction in online reading environments: challenges for students’reading comprehension. The Australian Educational Researcher, 38(2), 181-202.

Cohen, C. A., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Individual differences in use of external Visualizations to perform an internal Visualization task. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21(6), 701-711

Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2000) Research Methods in Education. 5th Edition, Routledge Falmer, London.

Denzin, Norman K. dan Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds.). 2009. Handbook of Qualitative. Research. Terj. Dariyatno dkk. Jogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Fajri, T. (2020), Pentingnya Penggunaan Pendekatan Multimodal Dalam Pembelajaran, The Online Journal of Distance Education. Universitas Brawijaya.

Fitriani, S. (2019), Visual Represntation and Comprehension: The Exploration of Image-Word Relations and Types of Design. International Journal of Language Education, Vol.3 No.2 pp.27-40, Universitas Syiah Kuala.

Fraenkel, Jack K and Norman E Wallen. 2011, How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York:Me Grow Hill,,Inc (e-book)

Harmer, J. (2001). How to teach English: An introduction to the practice of English language teaching, (7th ed). Kuala Lumpur: Addison Wesley Longman Inc

Helfferich, Cornelia (2019, 5. Ausgabe). Die Qualität Qualitativer Daten: Manual für die Durchführung von qualitativen Interviews. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag. Chapter 5.2

Holloway, I. (2005). Qualitative Research in Health Care. New York: Open University Press

Iedema, R. 2003. Multimodality, Resemiotization: Extending the Analysis of Discourse as Multisemiotic Practice. Visual Comunication, 1-30.

Januarty, R. (2018), Energizing Students’ Reading Comprehension Through Multimodal Texts. International Journal of Language Education, Vol.2 No.2 pp.14-22. Sebelas Maret University.

Jaya, A. (2020). Approaches and Experiences of English Teaching in Indonesia, Edukasi Lingua Sastra 18 (1), 57-65

Jaya, A., & Hermansyah., & Mortini, A. (2018). The Effect of Crawford Series Teaching (CST) on Students’ Writing Achievement. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme 1 (1)

Jewit, Carey and Kress, Ghunter (Eds). 2003. Multimodal Literacy. New York: Peter Lang

Kalantzis, M., & Cope, B. 2005. Learning by design. Melbourne, Aus.: Victorian

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge

Leeuwen, V. 2008. Space in discourse. In L. Unsworth (Ed.), Multimodal Semiotics: Functional Analysis in Contexts of Education (pp. 34–49). London: Continuum.

Marleni., Jaya. A., Hidayad. F., (2022). Integrated Curriculum Used in Learning English. Esteem Journal English Education Study Program. 304-308.

Mertens, M., & Donna (2009). Research and evaluation in education and pshycology integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. United Kingdom: SAGE Publication, Inc

Mikulecky, Beatrrice S. 2011. A Short Course in Teaching Reading: Practical Technique for Building Reading Power. United State America: Pearson Longman.

Nunan, D. (2003). Nunan, David 2003 Practical English Language Teaching. New York : Mc Graw Hill

Richards. J & Schamidt R. (2010). Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics (4th Edition. Great Britain.

Sankey, M., Birch, D., & Gardiner, M. 2010. Engaging Students through Multimodal Learning Environments: The journey Continues. In Ascilite 2010 (pp. 852-861).Sydney: Ascilite. Retrieved from

Santman, D. (2005). Shades of meaning: Comprehension and interpretation in middle school: Heinemann Educational Books. Schools Innovation Commisstion.

Sari. A., Jaya. A., Hermansyah., Mortini. A., (2022). Using Mixidea Online Debating Strategy to Promote The Students’ Speaking Ability. Esteem Journal English Education Study Program. 298-303.

Serafini, F. (2010). Reading Multimodal Texts: Pesceptual, Structural and Ideological Perspectives. Children’s Literature in Education, DOI 10.1007/s10583-010-9100-5

Serafini, F. (2011). Expanding Perspectives for Comprehending Visual Images in Multimodal Texts. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54 (5), 342-350. doi:10.1598/JAAL. 54. 5. 4.

Serafini, F. 2012. Reading Multimodal Texts in 21st Century, Reasearch in the School, Vol.19, No. 1, 26-23

Snow, Sweet;, C. a., & Anne. (2012). Rethinking Reading Comprehension. New York: Guilford.

Solvie, P., & Kloek, M. 2007. Using Technology Tools to Engage Students with Multiple Learning Styles in a Constructivist Learning Environment. ContemporaryIssues In Technology And Teacher Education, 7(2), 7-27. Retrieved from Tan, D., Gergle, D., Scupelli, P., & Pausch, R. 2006. Physically Large Displays Improve Performance on Spatial Tasks. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 13(1), 71–99

Sugiyono, 2008, Metode Penelitan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, Bandung.

Sugiyono. (2019) Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Yogyakarta. Alfabeta

Sulaiman, M. (2017). Teach Students Not The Books (A Handbook of TEFL) (1st ed). Palembang: CV Amanah

Unsworth, L. 2008. Multiliteracies, E-Literature and English Teaching. Language and Education, 22(1), 62–65.

Unsworth;, Len;, & Wheeler, J. (2002). Re-Valuing the Role of Images in Reviewing Picture Books. Reading, 36(2), 68-74

Uzer, Y. (2017). Penerapan Teknik Quantum Speed Reading Dalam Pengajaran Pemahaman Membaca. Wahana Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan, 14 (3)

Vayaravasamy, P., & Abdullah, A.C. 2011. Students’ and Teachers’ Preferences of ESL Classroom Activities. In A. Pandian, T. Chow & S. Mohamed Ismail, CurriculumDevelopment, Materials Design and Methodologies: Trends and Issues (1st ed.). Penang: University Sains Malaysia Press

Walsh, M. (2010). Multimodal literacy: What does it mean for classroom practice? Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(3), 211-239

Walsh, S. 2006. Investigating Classroom Discourse. London: Routledge.

Warman. L (2018). The Effect of Multimodal Texts on Students’ Reading Comprehension. International Conference od Educational Sciences, (437-443). STMIK-AMIK Riau.