TEACHING ENGLISH FOR SPEECH USING COOPERATIVE LEARNING TO THE SECOND SEMESTER STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v6i1.10866Keywords:
Teaching, Speech, Cooperative LearningAbstract
The title of this research is "Teaching English for Speech Using Cooperative Learning to Second Semester Students of ISB Atma Luhur Pangkal Pinang and Sjakhyakirti University". The formulation of the problem in this study: “Is cooperative learning effective in teaching English for Speech in the Second Semester? ISB Atma Luhur Pangkal Pinang and Sjakhyakirti University students?†The research method applied is experimental research. The experimental method applied is a quasi-experimental. The SPSS program is used to obtain experimental results. The statistical results between the experimental and control groups (t-obtained) must be higher than the t-table (0.05) for the two-tailed group, which is the result obtained based on data analysis. The students' scores for the control and experimental groups (the t-value obtained) were -10.325. The t value obtained is greater than the t table, the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis is obtained. It was found that teaching English in the use of speech by applying cooperative learning dialogue had better efficiency than the conventional method which was carried out in the second semester for students.References
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1997. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta : PT. Rineka Cipta.
Brown, Doglas, H. 1994. Teaching by Principles; An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, San Francisco State University, Prentice Hall Regent Englewood Clifs, New Jersey.
Fraenkel, Jack R and Norman E Wallen. 1993. Hot to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, New York, Mc Graw-Hill Block. Co
Gebhardt, Frederika. (2010-2011). English Pronunciation. Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia, Corsi di Laurea in Filosofia, Lettere, Storia
Gribbons, Barry & Herman, Joan (1997). True and quasi-experimental designs. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 5(14). Retrieved June 15, 2010 fromhttp://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=5&n=14
Heaton J.B. Writing English Language Tests, New York, the United State of America.
Joice. Bruce. An Article : A Guide to Cooperative Learning.
Kayi, Hayriye. (2017). Teaching Speaking: Activities to Promote Speaking in a Second Language. Nevada: University of Nevada
Kuoame, Julien B. (2010). Using Test to Improve the Accuracy of Evaluation Documents Intended for Low Literate Participants: Journal of Multi Disciplinary Evaluation Vol. VI Number 14 August 2010. Michigan: Western Michigan University
S, Sinta. 2010. “Teaching Speaking Skills Using Cooperative Learning to the Tenth Grade Students at SMA NEGERI 2 PALEMBANGâ€. Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Univeristas Muhammaiyah Palembang. Sumatera Selatan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sinta S, Andika Andika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
