AN ANALYSIS OF ENGLISH TEACHER’S LESSON PLAN REFERRING TO MERDEKA BELAJAR PROGRAM AT SMK PGRI 2 OF PALEMBANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v7i1.14091Keywords:
English Teacher, Lesson Plan, Merdeka Belajar CurriculumAbstract
The aims of this study was to know the ways or the stages use by the English teachers to design Merdeka Belajar lesson plan and to find out the difficulties face by the English teachers in designing the Merdeka Belajar lesson plan. The method of this study was qualitative descriptive method. The techniques of collecting data was using triangulation, which are observation, interview and also documentation. The interview conducted with three English teachers at SMK PGRI 2 of Palembang. After the data was obtained, the next step that the process of reducing the data occurring repeatedly. The results showed that for the first year, teachers were still confused about implementing Merdeka Belajar curriculum. So, teachers at SMK PGRI 2 Palembang have already join In House Training (IHT), in 2021 and 2022. Although the teacher faced some difficulties and obstacles such as lack of experience, inadequate infrastructure facilities from school, and there are some still confused about the learning system. To overcome that difficulties, teacher’s at SMK PGRI 2 of Palembang learn from the Merdeka Mengajar platfrom and collaborate with each teacher.
References
Ajayi, V. O. (2017). Primary Sources of Data and Secondary Sources of Data.
Arifin, Zainal. (2012). Konsep dan Model Pengembangan Kurikulum. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. New York. Longman
Cambridge Online Dictionary. (2023). Cambridge University Press. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/analysis
Cresswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4Th ed). Lincoln. SAGE
Damayanti, S. (2018). Relavancy The Components of The English Lesson Plan . English Journal, 12(2), 68-78.
Depdiknas. (2016a). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah.
Desrianti & Nelisma, Y. (2022). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Perpektif Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. Al-Fahim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam. 4(2). 158-172
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to evaluate research in education (8Th ed). [e-book]. Retrieved from https://www.google.co.id/url
Hafiah, N., & Suhana, C. (2012). Konsep Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Pt. Refika Aditama
Hartina, H. (2021). An Analysis of English Teachers' Lesson Plan Based on Curriculum 2013 at SMPN 1 Bangkinang Kota. Faculty Teacher Training and Education. Universitas Islam Riau: Pekanbaru
Hidayatullah, A. (2016). An Analysis on Lesson Plan Made by English Teacher at the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Muhammadiyah 1 Kartasura in Academic Year 2015/2016. Faculty Islamic Education and Teacher Training. The State Islamic Institute of Surakarta. Surakarta.
Marleni, Jaya, A., & Hidayad, F. (2022). Integrated Curriculum Used in Learning English. Esteem: Journal of English Education Study Programme, 5(2), 304-308.
Mortini, A. V., Jaya, A., & Zam, M. A. A. (2023). The Effect of Map Libs Technique on Students’ English Learning Achievement in Learning Personal Pronoun. ESTEEM: Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(2), 216-225.
Mulyasa, E. (2014). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosadakarta. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Remilard, J. T. (2005). Examining Key Concepts in Research on Teachers' Use of Mathematics Curricula. Review of Educational Research, 211-245.
Sugiono. (2012). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Sugiono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, CV.
Oktafianti, T. (2019). An Analysis of Lesson Plan Made by An English Teacher Referring to Curriculum 2013 at MTs Al-Qur'an Harsallakum Bengkulu in Academic Year 2018/2019. Faculty of Tarbiyah and Tadris. State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) Bengkulu: Bengkulu
Pendidikan, D. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. In Jakarta: Depdiknas (Vol. 33, Issue 31, p. 79192564). https://referensi.elsam.or.id/2014/11/uu-nomor-20-tahun-2003tentang-sistem-pendidikan-nasional
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Utami Cahyani, Ferri Hidayad, Evi Rosmiyati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
