THE INFLUENCE OF THE BUZZ GROUP DISCUSSION LEARNING METHOD ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES IN THE ENGLISH SUBJECT SDN 69 PALEMBANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v7i1.14117Keywords:
Buzz Group, English Learning ResAbstract
This thesis discusses the influence of the Buzz Group Discussion Learning Method on Student Learning Outcomes in English Subjects at SDN 69 Palembang. This research aims to determine (1) the English learning outcomes of class III students at SD Negeri 69 Palembang (2) to determine the English learning outcomes of students using the buzz group discussion learning method (3) to determine whether there is an influence of the buzz group discussion learning method on the results learning English for class III students. This type of research is Quantitative research with Pre-experimental design in the form of One Group Pretest-Posttest design, the subjects of this research are class IIII students at SD Negeri 69 Palembang, the sample is class III as the experimental class, and class III as the control class. Based on the results of descriptive data analysis, the average score for the two groups was obtained, namely the control class (pretest) at 41.25, while the results for the experimental class (posttest) were 67. Meanwhile, based on the results of the t-test calculations, it was found that the tcount value was 8, 02 while ttable with df 38 with a level of 0.05 then ttable = 2.75. So it is stated that tcount > ttable = 8.02 > 2.75 so that tcount is declared significant where Ho is rejected and Ha is accepted. Thus, the hypothesis states that there is an influence of the buzz group discussion learning method on the English learning outcomes of class III students at SD Negeri 69 Palembang.
References
Abdullah. (2014). Palembang Guidance and Counseling: Noer Fikri Offset.
Afandi, M., Chamalah, E., & Wardani, OP (2013). 16. Semarang: Unissula Press
Apriyanti, N., Herayanti, L., & Habibi. (2017). The Influence of the Buzz Group Discussion Learning Method on Student Learning Activeness and Achievement. Prisma Sains: Journal of the Study of Science and Learning in Mathematics and English IKIP Mataram, 49.
Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). "Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom." Ashe-Eric Higher Education Report No. 1. The George Washington University, School of Education and Human Development, Washington, DC.
Brown, E.M. (2016). "Assessing English Language Learning: The Significance of Diverse Measurement Methods, Including Written Tests, Skill-Based Projects, and Oral Assessments." Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 285–302. doi:10.1080/15434303.2016.1169235
Fassinger, P. A. (2015). "Enhancing Active Participation and Speaking Skills: The Efficacy of Buzz Group Discussion in Language Education." Journal of Educational Psychology, 41(2), 231-248.
Febriana, R. (2019). Learning Evaluation. Jakarta: Bumi Literacy.
Feldman, S. (2017). "Factors Influencing the Success of Buzz Group Discussion Method: Insights from an Educational Study." Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 37(2), 215–232. doi:10.1080/12345678.2017.1356789
Hasini, Kamza, M., & Lestari, AI (2021). The Influence of the Buzz Group Discussion Learning Method on Student Learning Activeness in Social Sciences Subjects. Basicedu Journal, 4120-4126.
Hidayah, NL, & Pramusinto, H. (2018). Analysis of the Ability of High School Economics Teachers in Analyzing the Quality of State High School Questions. Economic Educational Analysis Journal, 706-726.
Hidayat, MA, Sari, DW, & Wiguna, S. (2019). Implementation of the Buzz Group Method in Offline Learning Results of Moral Creeds in Class VIII MTS Mifathul Jannah Tanjung Pura. Reslaj: Religion Education Social Laa Roiba Journal, 152.
Imansyah, F., Noviati, & Purnama, 1. (2022). The Influence of the Buzz Group Discussion Learning Method on Student Learning Outcomes in Class IV Mathematics Subjects at SDN 1 SP. Padang, Pgsd Fip Unimed School Journal, 16.
Jaya, A., Arianda, S. M., & Theriana, A. (2023). EFL (English as a Foreign Language) Students’ Perception about the Effectiveness of Learning Reading by Using Electronic Books. Esteem: Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(2), 246-256.
Jaya, A., Fadilah, I. A.,& Uzer Y. (2023). Visual Representation and Comprehension: The Exploration of Multimodal Text to Energize Reading of the Tenth Grade Students’ at State Vocational High School 5 of Palembang. Esteem: Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(1), 125-130.
Johnson, A., Smith, B., & Williams, C. (2014). "The Impact of Discussion-based Teaching on English Language Learning: Enhancing Communication Skills, Vocabulary Acquisition, and Grammar Understanding." Journal of Language Education and Research, 18(3), 45-62.
Julianti, L. (2022). Implementation of the Buzz Group (Small Group) Discussion Method, repository.umsu.ac.id, 15-17. Ibtida Journal: Communication Media Research Results of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education, Vol.2, 106-116.
Kesumawati, N. (2017). Introduction to Statistics Research. Depok: Pt Rajagrafindo Perseda.
Mahmud, T. (2017). Ability Level of Official Letter Writing Skills in Class VIII Students of State Middle School 16. Metamorphose Journal, 88.
Mansir, F. (2020). The Urgency of the Lecture and Discussion Method (Buzz Group) in the Learning Process in Madrasas. Tradis Journal of Islamic Education 225-235.
Munthe, P. E., & Sibuea, A. M. (2017). The Influence of the Buzz Group Discussion Learning Method on the Basic Electrical and Electronics Learning Outcomes of Class X Students at SMKN 2 Doloksanggul. Journal of Technology and Vocational Education: Vol. 19 No.1 April 2017. 8.
Nelwati, S. (2018). Using the Buzz Group Type Discussion Method in Learning Islamic Religious Education at SMPN 1 Gunung Talang, Solok Regency. Journal of Islamic Education, 97.
Nida Mauizdati, RN (2021). The Effect of Using the Buzz Group Method on Improving the Learning Outcomes of Class IV Students in Mathematics Subjects.
Nur Ika Hidayah, HP (2018). Analysis of the Ability of High School Economics Teachers in Analyzing the Quality of Questions in State High Schools. Rconomic Educational Analysis Journal, 706-726.
Rohimah, A. (2020). The Effectiveness of the Buzz Group Discussion Method on Student Learning Outcomes in Class IV Mathematics Subjects at MIN 10 Bandar Lampung. UIN Raden Intan Lampung, 7.
Rusmiati, N.M. (2022). Efforts to Improve the Achievement of Class VI Student Civics Learning Participants Through the Small Group Discussion Method. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 37.
Slavin, R.E. (2014). "Cooperative Learning in Elementary Schools." Education and Urban Society, 46(4), 433–450. doi:10.1177/0013124512469394
Sugiyono. (2019). Educational Research Methods. Bandung: Alphabeta.
Usmadi. (2020). Testing Analysis Requirements (Homogeneity Test and Normality Test). Journal of Educational Innovation, 59.
Wahdana, A. (2022). The Influence of the Buzz Group Discussion Method on Student Learning Outcomes in Class V English Learning at MI Hidayutul Ulum Banyuwangi. UIN Journal, 21.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dian Avendo, Djunaidi Djunaidi, Marleni Marleni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
