THE INFLUENCE OF SUMMARIZING TECHNIQUE AND READING MOTIVATION TOWARD READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT FOR THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 18 PALEMBANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v7i1.15664Keywords:
Summarizing Technique, Reading Motivation, Reading Comprehension AchievementAbstract
The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a significant difference in reading comprehension between students who are taught a summarizing technique and those who are not. Additionally, the study sought to determine whether there is a significant difference in reading comprehension between students who are taught a summarizing technique and those who have low reading motivation. The students in the seventh grade at Junior High School 18 Palembang were divided into two groups. In this investigation, factorial design was used. The study's population consisted of all 238 seventh-grade students enrolled in Junior High School 18 Palembang during the academic year 2023–2024. Saturation sampling was used to take samples from 68 students: 34 students from the VII.7 class were in the experimental group, while 34 students from the VII.6 class were in the control group. The researcher used a questionnaire to gather data in order to evaluate students' reading motivation. She also used traditional and summarizing techniques to teach students reading comprehension skills. The data were then analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics. The study's findings demonstrated a substantial difference in reading comprehension between students who were taught a summarizing strategy and those who were not, with regard to seventh-grade students at Junior High School 18 Palembang. The students with high reading motivation were taught the technique.
References
Al Aziz, E. N., & Yusanti, G. (2020). Increasing Students’ Reading Comprehension Skill By Using Written Text Book. English Education : Journal of English Teaching and Research, 5(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v5i2.145 00
Andini, Y. (2019). The Instruction of Summarizing Strategy in Teaching of Reading Analytical Exposition Text for Eleventh Grader Students at Vocational High School. Retain Journal, 7(3), 101–109.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantative and Qualitative Research (Fourth, Vol. 21, Issue 1). PEARSON.
Fitria, W. (2019). Reading Interest and Reading Comprehension : A Correlational Study. Journal Educative : Journal of Educational Studies, 4(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.30983/educative.v4i 1.1333
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (Eighth). McGraw-Hill.
Guanabara, E., Ltda, K., Guanabara, E., & Ltda, K. (2015). The Effect Of Summarizing Technique On Reading Achievement. Journal Udikma, 2.
Muslaini. (2017). Strategies For Teaching Reading Comprehension By Muslaini * Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh. English Educational Jurnal, 8(1), 66–77.
Nurhayati, D. A. W., & Fitriana, M. W. (2018). Effectiveness of Summarizing in Teaching Reading Comprehension for Efl Students. IJOLTL: Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics, 3(1), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.30957/ijoltl.v3i1.403
Qalby, N. (2014). Improving the Students’ Reading Comprehension Through Explicit Teaching Strategy. Exposure : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris, 3(2), 155. https://doi.org/10.26618/ejpbi.v3i2.83 4
Ramirez-Avila, M. R., & Barreiro, J. P. (2021). The Effect of Summarizing Narrative Texts to Improve Reading Comprehension. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 6(2), PRESS. https://doi.org/10.18196/ftl.v6i2.11707
Rombot, O., Boeriswati, E., & Suparman, M. A. (2020). Improving Reading Comprehension Skills of International Elementary School Students through Blended Learning. Al Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, 7(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v 7i1.6045
Saini, F., Halimah, N., & Basala, A. H. (2021). Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies In Descriptive Text. Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature Studies, 1(2), 118–132. https://doi.org/10.30984/jeltis.v1i2.16 71
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (22nd Ed.). Alfabeta.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Rifdah Nafila, Indawan Sari, Mulyadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
