THE INFLUENCE OF CONTEXT CLUES STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v2i2.2457Abstract
The main problem of this study was “Is there any significant influence of context clues strategy on student reading narrative text achievement of the tenth grade students of state Senior High School 2 of Palembang?â€. Therefore, objective of this study was to find out whether or not there is significant influence of context clues strategy to their reading ability of the tenth grade students of state Senior High School 2 of Palembang. The population of this study was 185 students consisting of five classes. The writer took the sample from the population through purposive non random sampling with the total 37 students. In this study, the writer used pre-experimental method, the data were collected through the written test and where analyzed by using the matched t-test. Based on the findings, the students’ average score in the pre-test was 55.74 the highest score in the pre-test was 82.5 achieved by one student and the lowest score in the pre-test was 2.5 achieved by one student. The average score in the post-test was 70.60, the highest score was 87.5 achieved by one student, and the lowest score was 57.5 obtained by three students. To compare the students’ score in pre-test and the posttest, matched t-test was used, and it was found that t-obtained (6.016) was higher than critical value t-table (1.684). It means that Ho was rejected and Ha was accepted. In means that there was a significant influence of context clues strategy on student reading narrative text achievement of the tenth grade students of state Senior High School 2 of Palembang
References
Jaya, A. Habibi, A. 2016. Fishbowl Technique and Learning Interest Effects on Speaking Achievement of SMK Sembawa. Jambi-English Language Teaching. 1(1)
Karbalaei, A. et al. (2012), context clues accessed from
http://suite101.com/article/teach-context-xlues-to-learn-new-vocabulary-a193401
.
Fraenkel, Jack R., Normal E. Wallen, and Helen H. Hyun.(2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Hatch, E and Larazaton, A. (1991).Design and Statistic for Applied Linguistics: the Research Manual. Los Angles :University of California.
Haryani, R.2014. Modulbahasainggris 1b. Jakarta: CV GrahaPustaka.
Ahmad.Z.2009.
Hornby. 2010. Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary. New York: Oxford University Press
Hibbard, Rachael. 2009. The Effects of Context Clue Instruction on Finding an Unknown 9Word. A Thesis. New York: St. John Fisher College
J.F., Font. G., Edward. E.C & Boland E (2005) using context clues Context-clues-article2pdf.
http://mathandreadinghelp.org context_clue_for_children_when_reading.html
Narrative,(online)http://ahmadzahrowi,wordpress.com2009/04/24/narrative/#more-390. Accessed on January 20th , 2015
(online )Admin. 2012. Reading ability. Retrieved on june, 2012.
http://satriawan35.blogspot.co.id/2012/06student-reading-ability-improvement-by.html?m=1 10.
Pektus, Thandra. 2013. Teach context clues to learn new vocabulary. Retrieved on july 6, 2013 Princeton university. Narrative. Retrieved on april 04, 2013
http://engagency.org/sites/default/files/resource/attachments/la_guide-context clues.pdf.
SelvinaNugrawati. 2009.Teaching Reading Comprehension through context clues to the eighth grade students of the state junior high school 1 of betung. Undergraduate thesis : University of FKIP PGRI Palembang.
Saleh, Yusrizal. (1997). Mehtodology of TELF in the Indonesia Context Book 1.Faculty of Teacher Training and Education.Sriwijaya University.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
