LEARNING ELLIPTICAL SENTENCES THROUGH DIAGRAMMING BY THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF PEMBINA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL OF PALEMBANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v2i1.4816Keywords:
Ellpitical sentence, Diagramming, and Learning.Abstract
Abstract: The objective of this research was to find out it is effective learning elliptical sentences through diagramming by the eleventh grade students of the Pembina Senior High School of Palembang.The population of this investigation was all of the eleventh grades students of the Pembina Senior High School of Palembang, in the academic year of 2017/2018. It consisted of 147 students for 4 classes. In this research, the sample was two classes chosen through the cluster random sampling. One was treated as the experimental group and the other as the control group. After getting the two classes, the researcher did the individual random sampling by give a pretest to the students from the two classes as pretested and then matched based on their similar scores and got 25 pairs as sample. In research the researcher used the quasi experimental method with the randomized posttest-only control group design; the data were collected through the written test and were analyzed by using the percentage formula and t-test. Based on the result of the data analysis, it shows that the t-obtained was 4.547 and the t-critical value was 1.711 from degree of freedom (df) = 24. It means that the t-obtained was greater than the critical value or 4,547>1.711. It means the null hyporesearch was rejected and alternative hyporesearch was accepted. In conclusion, in was effective learning elliptical sentences through diagramming by the eleventh grade students of Pembina Senior High School of Palembang was effective.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.