Grading; some references to help teacher
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v1i1.4828Keywords:
grading, teacherAbstract
Abstract: Most of the teacher especially in Palembang or south Sumatera did not know about the topic discuss in here, the conclusion is they have to know and applicant the grading system as mentioned above, the principle or mechanics, kinds and general grading system used in many countries. In conclusion by grading the teacher could observe and see the result assessment given to their students having the result for further topics, so by grading the teacher hopefully could change their way or their perception towards the grading issued.References
Bratcher, Susan and Linda, Ryan.2004. Evaluating Children’s Writing (2nd Ed).London, Newjersey: Lawrence Erlabaum Associates.
Davie, Barbara Grooss. 1999. Tools for Teaching. San Fransisco: Joorssey-Bass.
Garry, Hornby, Carol and Eric Hall. 2003. Counselling Pupils in Schools Skills and Strategies for Teachers. London and New York: Routledge Falmes.
J. Wilbert, Mckeachie. 1995. Teaching Tips: Startegies, Research and Theory for College and University Teacher (10th Ed). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Salend and Duhaney. 2002. Teaching Exceptional Children. Vol.34. No.3, pp 15. Council for Exceptional Children.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
