E-LEARNING AND LEARNING INTEREST TOWARDS THE STUDENTS’ ENGLISH ACHIEVEMENT

Authors

  • Ana Theriana PGRI University of Palembang
  • Dewi Kartika Sari PGRI University of Palembang
  • Etty Pratiwi PGRI University of Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v4i1.5135

Keywords:

E-Learning, Achievement, Interests

Abstract

This research aimed to determine that E-Learning Based Learning and students’ interest in learning can make a significant difference in increasing learning achievement. Researchers took  two research samples. The first group was taught using E-Learning and the second using conventgional (face-to-face). To collect data, both groups were given a speech test and an interest in learning questionnaire. For E-Learning, data had collected using the Zoom application which is evaluated by the researcher using a questionnaire consisting of 2 parts, namely fluency and understanding. Meanwhile, students' interest in learning was evaluated using a questionnaire. In E-Learning, lecturers and students consider several topics given by the lecturer. After that, they decide what type of product they  produced on their project as a final result, such as: Visual Learning Media, Audio Learning Media and Audiovisual Learning Media. The results showed that (1) there was a significant difference in both student interest in learning (t = 8.822, p <.000) and achievement (t = 7.911, p <.000) from the experimental group after being taught using E-Learning, (2 ) the contribution to the improvement of student learning achievement was 98.7% and interest in learning was 92.1%. So it can be concluded that E-Learning-based learning has an effect on student achievement and interest in learning.

References

Ahmadi, Arif. (2016). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan E-Learning Pada Proses Pembelajaran Sistem Kelistrikan Siswa Kelas X Jurusan Teknik Otomotif Di SMK N 2 Pengasih.(Published In Program Studi Pendidikan Teknik Otomotif Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta). Yogyakarta.

Arikunto, S. (1993). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktek. Yogyakarta: CV Pustaka Utama Yogyakarta.

Basrowi & Soeyono (2007). Metode analysis data sosial. Kediri: CV Jenggala Pustaka Utama.

Beh, Y. (1997). Current research in Southeast Asia. RELC Journal. 28(1), 175-179.

Bloom, B. S (2003). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York, NY: Pearson Education.

Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language
pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York, NY: Pearson Education.

Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for Campbell, D. T., & Julian, C. S. (1991). The experimental and quasi experimental designs for research on teaching. The English Teacher, 3(1), 34-37.

Chaney, A. L. (2005) Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

Celce, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. Orlando, FL: Earl Mcpeek.

Dawson, C. ( 2007). A practical guide to research method. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dornyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ducket, B. (2009). Longman dictionary of contemporary. Edinbugh: Pearson Education Limited.
Harmer, J. (.2007). The practice of English language teaching. Cambridge, UK:: Cambridge University Press.

Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
.
Hulsman, A. (2002). Theory of interest. The quarterly journal of Austrianeconomic, 18(2), 161-175.

Jaya, A. (2017). Sentence Patterns of Narrative Text in English Textbook in Indonesia. English Community Journal. 1 (2).

Jaya, A. (2017). The Influence of the Teachers’ Questioning Strategies on the Eleventh Grade Students’ Speaking Achievement at SMKN 1 Palembang. JELT Jambi-English Language Teaching. 2(1).

Lee, C., Chao, L., & Chen. (2011). The influence of interest in learning and learning hours on learning outcomes of vocational college students in Taiwan; using a teacher’s’ instructional attitude as the moderator. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 2(2), 16-20.

McMillan, J.H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: evidence-based inquiry, 2(2). New York, NY: Pearson.

Muhammad Nasirulloh. (2007). Manfaat E-learning Untuk Pendidikan. Makalahditerbitkan. Diakses darihttp://media.diknas.go.id.Tanggal 16 April 2013.

Onno W. Purbo. (2002). Teknologi E-learning Berbasis PHP dan MySQL.

Richards, C. J., & Rodgers, T.S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.

Rusman,Deni Kurniawan,dan Cepi Riyana. (2011). Pembelajaran BerbasisTeknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi. Mengembangkan profesionalitas guru. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Setiawati, Mariana. Nurfaraditha, Iin. dkk. Perbandingan Metode Pembelajaran E-learning Dan Tradisional.(Program Studi Sistem Infomrasi, Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Gunadarma).Unpublished. Depok

Siegle, D. (2009). The importance of recognizing student’s interest and parenting for high potential. New York, NY: Addition Wesley Longman.

Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Soekartawi. 2007. Merancang dan menyelenggarakan E-learning. Yogyakarta: Ardana Media.

Sumarmi, Made Ayu. 2010. Pengaruh E-Learning Dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Kemampuan Membaca Bahasa Inggris ( Studi Eksperimen pada SMK Negeri 3 Tabanan).Unpublished. Tabanan.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-15