STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON THE USE OF JOHNY GRAMMAR’S WORD CHALLENGE APPLICATION IN LEARNING PREPOSITIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v4i2.6184Keywords:
Perception, Johnny Grammar’s Word Challenge Application, PrepositionsAbstract
The main problem of this study is “What were the eleventh grade students’ perception on the use Johnny grammar’s word challenge application in learning prepositions and the impact of Johnny grammar’s word challenge application the eleventh grade at PGRI Vocational High School 2 of Palembang?â€. This study aimed to investigate the eleventh grade students’ perception on the use Johnny grammar’s word challenge application in learning prepositions at PGRI Vocational High School 2 of Palembang. This data acquired from questionnaires based on four indicators, this research used a descriptive qualitative method in this study. Based on the achievement of the questionnaire, it can be concluded that all indicator high category shows that amounts to 9 (16.36%) students which means the students have comprehension ability is fair, the indicator medium category shows that amounts to 41(74.54%) students which means all of the students understand Johnny Grammar’s Word Challenge Application and the low category shows that amounts to 11 (20%) students which means the students half of them can not able to understand Johnny Grammar’s Word Challenge Application. So, it can be concluded that using Johnny Grammar’s Word Challenge Application can help students learn prepositionsReferences
Al-Essa, N. S. (2018). The Impact of Using Edmodo as a Blended Learning Medium on Promoting Saudi EFL Female Secondary School Students’ English Grammar. Arab World English Journal
Al-Said, K. M. (2015). Students' Perceptions of Edmodo and Mobile Learning and Their Real Barriers towards Them. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 14(2), 167-180
Baehaqi, I. (2012). A Handbook of English Grammar. Yogyakarta: Cakrawala Ilmu
Darmadi, H (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dan Sosial. Bandung: Alfabeta
Fadillah, R. (2019). STUDENTS’PERCEPTION ON THE USE OF MIND MAPPING APPLICATION SOFTWARE IN LEARNING WRITING. Celtic: A Journal of Culture, English Language Teaching, Literature, & Linguistics, 6(1), 58-64.
Inayati, A. M., & Damayanti, D. (2016). IMPROVING STUDENTS’GRAMMAR ABILITY (SIMPLE PAST TENSE) USING JOHNY GRAMMAR WORD CHALLENGE APPLICATION IN JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL. In Proceeding of the International Conference on Teacher Training and Education (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 876-881).
ERRORS IN WRITING RECOUNT TEXTS. Englisia: journal of language, education, and humanities, 5(1), 41-50.
Lui, A. K., Choy, S. O., Cheung, Y. H., & Li, S. C. (2006). A study on the perception of students towards educational weblogs. Informatics in Education, 5(2), 245-266.
Miangah, T. M., & Nezarat, A. (2012). Mobile-assisted language learning. International Journal of Distributed and Parallel Systems, 3(1), 309.
Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2019). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson. One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.
Mirazna, M. N., & Hikmah, N. (2019). STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS TOWARD GRAMMAR IN ENGLISH CLASSROOM. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 2(5), 682-686.
Sandi, K. (2017). An Analysis of Students’ Ability in Using Passive Voice at the Third Grade Students of MAS Kepenuhan. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FKIP Prodi Bahasa Inggris, 2(1).
Simaibang, B. (2018). English Grammar for Foreign Learners. Palembang: Citra Books Indonesia.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
http://educraft.tech/johnny-grammar-challenge
https://tipsmake.com/how-to-learn-english-on-the-phone-with-johnny-grammars-word-challenge
http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/organization/perception/perception-meaning-definition-nature.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.