THE INFLUENCE OF RUNNING DICTATION TECHNIQUE AND LEARNING MOTIVATION TOWARDS READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMPN 35 PALEMBANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v4i2.6206Keywords:
Running Dictation Technique, Conventional Teaching Technique, Learning Motivation, Reading ComprehensionAbstract
This research was concerned with the influence of running dictation technique and learning motivation towards reading comprehension achievement of the eighth grade students of SMPN 35 Palembang. In this study 60 students of eighth grade students of SMPN 35 Palembang in the academic year 2020/2021 were chosen as samples by means of two stage random sampling. This study applied factorial research design. The data were collected by using questionaire and test. The data were analyzed by using Paired Sample t-test, Independent Sample t-test, and Two- Way ANOVA. From the two way ANOVA test results of 0.712 > 0.05, the results are obtained first, there was a significant influence in students’ reading comprehension taught by using running dictaton technique. Second, there was not any significant influence in students’ reading comprehension taught by conventional teaching technique. Third, there was significant influence in students’ reading comprehension students who have high and low learning motivation by using running dictation technique and conventional teaching technique. Last, there is not any significant interaction effects of motivation on students’ narrative text comprehension taught by using running dictation technique and learning motivation towards the students’ reading comprehension of SMPN 35 Palembang. So, running dictation technique was effective for students who have high and low learning motivation.
References
Andyani, H. (2012). Using Fun Activity To Improve Listening Skills. Mojokerto: Madrasah Tsanawiyah Negeri Mojokerto.
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Bacha, N. N. (2002). Testing Writing in the EFL Classroom: Student Expectations, English Teaching Forum. Retrieved June 8, 2017, fromhttps://americanenglish.state.g ov/files/ae/r esource_files/02-40-2- e.pdf.
Berry, J. H. (2005). Levels of Reading Comprehension. Retrieved November 5, 2018, from jberry@sc4.edu.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An interactive Approach To language Pedagogy. New York: Longman.
Brummit-Yale, J. (2008). An article: What is Reading Comprehension? Retrieved November 5, 2018, from http://EzineArticles.com/? expert=Cynthia_Joffrion.
Budiani, I. (2013). The Correlation of Language Learning Styles, Language needs, Reading Attitude, and Reading Comprehension of The Achievement of The Students of The State Senior High School 1 of Indralaya Ogan Ilir. Palembang: The Unpublished Thesis.
Graduate Program, PGRI University of Palembang.
Cooper, H. (1998). Synthesizing Research: A Guide for Literature Reviews (3rd Ed). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Cooper, J. W. (1988). The what & how reading of instruction Columbus. Merill publishing co.
Davies, F. (1995). Introducing Reading. England: Penguin Book.
Durkin, D. (1993). Teaching Them to Read (6th ed.). Boston: MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: Third Edition. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Fraenkel. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: Mcgraw Hill, Inc.
Fraenkel, J. R. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Singapore: McGrawl Hill.
Grabe, W. F. (2002). Teaching and Researching Reading. New York: Pearson Education.
Grellet, F. (1998). Developing Reading Skills: A Practical Guide to Reading Comprehension Exercises. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Guide to Teaching Reading at the primary School Level CH1. The United Nations Educational.
Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (4th ed). Longman: Pearson Education Limited.
Jannah, M. (2018). The Influence of Direct Reading Thinking Activity (DRTA) Strategy and Reading Interest towards Reading Achievement ofthe Tenth Grade Students at MA Miftahul Jannah Peninjauan OKU. Palembang: Thesis Graduate Program, PGRI University of Palembang.
Jaya, A. 2017. The Influence of Teachers’ Questioning Strategies on the Eleventh Grade Students’ Speaking Achievement at SMKN 1 Palembang. Jambi- English Language Teaching. 2 (1).
Jaya, A. 2017. Sentence Patterns of Narrative Text in English Textbook in Indonesia. English Community Journal. 1 (2).
Kesumawati, A. (2017). Statistik Parametrik. Palembang: Noer Fikri.
Klingner, B. (2007). Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties. The Guildford Press.
Konza, D. (2006). Teaching Children with Reading Difficulties. 2nd(ed). Australia: Thomson Learning / Socials Sciences Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
