USING EDMODO AND STUDENTS’ READING MOTIVATION ON STUDENTS’ WRITING ABILITY IN NARRATIVE TEXT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v4i2.6215Keywords:
Using Edmodo, Reading motivation, Writing AbilityAbstract
Writing ability is the power of students to write something with a good way. In writing there are some aspects influences in good writing. The aspects are organization, content, grammar, mechanic, and vocabulary. Besides that, having ideas or opinion also influent in writing activity. The population of the research consisted of all the eighth-grade students of SMP 35 Palembang in the academic year of 2020-2021, and there were 32 students of them chosen as the samples of the research. The samples were selected by using proportional random sampling technique, because all of individuals in the population have the same opportunity to be chosen as the sample. In this research, the researcher investigates the correlation among the the use of edmodo, students’ reading motivation and writing ability. In analyzing the data, it was used multiple correlation in SPSS 22.0 Program for Windows. The data analysis shows that Ryx1x2 = 0,663 at the significant level of 0,05. And for the criteria of significant test is gotten Fcount 9,798 >Ftable (0,05) (4,02). The result of hypothesis test showed that there is a significant correlation among the use of edmodo, students’ reading motivation and writing ability.
References
Arikunto, Suharsini. 2006. Presedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, Suharsini. 2010. Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta. Rineka Cipta.
Azwar, Saifuddin. 2012. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bahri, El. 2007. Teaching English Vocabulary Using Games. Jakarta. From www.maselbahri.blogspot.com.
BraceDawey, Langveld. 2001. Informal Education.
http:/academic.Cuesta.Edu/acasu p/AS/501. Htm.Retrieved on January 11th, 2011.
Biehler, Snowman.1997. Psycology Applied to Teaching,8/e Houghton Miffin Boas, Isabela Villas. 2011. Process Writing and the Internet: Blogs and Ning Networks in the Classroom [Online]. English Teaching Forum:
26-33. Availabl http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ962381.pdf
Borg, Nic and Jeff O’hara. 2013. About Edmodo. [Online]. Available at:
https://www.edmodo.com/about [Accessed: 21 Juni 2015]
Brown, H., Douglas. 2004. Language Assessment, principle and
classroom practices. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Brown, H., Douglas. 2007. Teaching by Principle and Interactive
Approach to Language Pedagogy. USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Cambridge University.Disney, Learning Partnership. (2002). How Does It Differ from the Traditional Approach [Online]? Available at:
http://www.thirteen.org/edonline/ concept2 class/month6/index_sub1.html- 16k [17 October 2013].
Carrol, Brendan J, and Patri J, Hall. 1985. Make Your Own Language test. Oxpford: Pegamon Institute of English.
Crookes, G, & Schmidt R.W.1998. Motivation: Reopening the reaserch agenda Learning Language.
Davis Barbara gross. 1993. Tools for Teaching.San Francisc: Jossey-Bass Publisher.
Dewi, Aprilia (2015) Improving the Writing Skill of Narrative Text through Project-Based Learning for Grade VII Students of SMP Magelang Academic year 2014-2015.â€
Diem, C. D., Ihsan,D., Purnomo, M. E., &Indrawati , S. (2003). Pengembangan Model Program Membaca untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Membaca dan Keterampilan Belajar .Linguistik Indonesia, 21(20, 203-227).
Ellis, R. 1991. Grammaticallity Judgment and Second Laguage Acquasition. Studies concepts and Implications. New York,NY : John willey & Scons
Ebbers, Susan M. 2012. How to Generate Interest so Reading
Comprehension Improves. Online Jurnal.Retrived November 10, 2011 fromhttp://www.cdl.org/resourceli brary/library_browse.php /type=author&id=75.
Elrod, Jennifer. 2012. Assessment Tolls Used in School.
http/www.ehow.com/info_ 7956483 _ assessment-tools-used- schools.html on Januari 1st, 2013.
Emzir.2012. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Fraenkle, Jack., Norman E. Wallen., Hellen H. Hyun. 2012. How to
Design and Evaluate Research in Education. United States: San Francisco State University.
Fitriani, DwiEka. 2012. The Correlation between Students’ Reading
Interest and Their Writing ability at the Second Year Students of SMPN 10 Kotabumi North Lampung Academic Year 2012.Universitas Lampung.
Finegan,E. 1999. Language: Its structure and use (3nd ed). Harcourt
Fox, Emily et all. 2000. Reading Interest and The Model of Learning:
A Development Model of Interest, Knowledge, and Strategy Use in Text Comprehension. England: Maryland December 20, 2011 from eKv5qnwC&printsec=frontcover &hl=id.
Gardner, R.C. 1982. Attitudes and Motivation in Second Language Learning. Rowley Massachusetts: Newbury house Publishers.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
