THE INFLUENCE OF TBLT AND LEARNING MOTIVATION TOWARD WRITING ACHIEVEMENT TO THE ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMK N 3 PALEMBANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v4i2.6244Keywords:
TBLT Technique, Motivation, and WritingAbstract
This research was conducted in experimental group with the total sample was 34 students of eleventh grade students of SMK N 3 Palembang in the second semester in the academic year 2016-2017 and it inquiry of the influence of TBLT and Learning Motivation toward Writing Achievements. The problem of this study is to find out the significance average score and motivation between TBLT and Conventional Technique. Due the interpretation of this study, it found that: (1) there was a significant difference in writing achievement between the student who taught by using TBLT and those are taught using conventional technique (2) there was significant difference in writing achievement between the students who have high motivation by using task based language teaching and conventional technique (3) there was significant difference in writing achievement between the students who have low motivation by using task based language teaching and conventional technique 4) there was significant difference in writing achievement between the students who have low and high motivation by using task based language teaching and (5) there was an interaction effect of technique used and student’s motivation in improving writing achievement.
References
Clleand, David, Mc.1996.Interaksi & Motivasi Belajar Mengajar.Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Dickinson, Paul. 2010. Implementing TBLT in a Japanese EFL Context.UK. Birmingham University.
Douglas, S. R. & Kim, M. 2014.Task-Based Language Teaching and English for Academic Purposes: An Investigation into Instructor Perceptions and Practice in the Canadian Context TESL CANADA JOURNAL/REVUE TESL DU CANADA 1. VOLUmE 31, SpECiAL iSSUE 8, 2014
Ellis, R. 2009. Task-Based Language Teaching: Sorting Out The Misunderstandings.Shanghai International Studies University and University of Auckland
Fraenkel, Jack R. and Norman E. Wallen. 2012. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Gardner, R. C. (2003).S ocial Psychology and Second Language Learning. London: Edward Arnold.
Harmer, J. 2006. The Practice of English Language Teaching. England: Edinburg Gate Harlow.
Jaya, A. (2017). The Effects of Group Discussion on The Students’ Speaking Achievement And Self-Efficacy. English Empower: Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 2(01), 10-19.
Liebstein & Renninge, K.A.2007.Interest for Writing: How Teachers Can Make A Difference Retrieved. From Jesserbishop.Wiki.Westega.Edu/ffile/view/interest+for+Writing.pdf
Nasution,A.S.2017.The Effect of Task-Based Learning Method on Students’ Achievement in Writing. A graduate of English Language and Literature Department of UNIMED
Poblette, Judy H. 1999. Communicating Christian Values Through Teaching English as a Second Language : The Use of Poetry. Michigan: Andrews University.
Sabet,K,M.& Tahriri,A.2014.The Impact of Task-based Approach on Iranian EFL Learners‟ Motivation in Writing Research.Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 953-962, July 2014© 2014 ACADEMY PUBLISHER Manufactured in Finland.
Sholihah, Umi. 2013. Task-Based Language Teaching (Tblt) Can Improve Students'Writing Ability. .http://scholar.google.co.id. (Februari ,2017)
Slamento. 2003. Belajar & Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Styati, Erlik Widiyani. 2010. The Effectiveness of Cluster Technique in Teaching Writing Skill Viewed fromStudents’ Linguistic Intelligence (an Experimental Research on Descriptive Writing for the Second Semester of English Department of IKIP PGRI Madiun in the Academic Year of 2009/2010.Unpublished Thesis English Education Department Graduate School Sebelas Maret University of Surakarta.
Weigle.2002.Assessing Writing.Cambridge.United Kingdom.
Willis, D. & Willis, J. (2004).Task-based language teaching: some questions and answers. The Language Teacher, 33/3, 3–8.
Willis, D. & Willis, J. (2007).Doing Task-based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
