INCREASING THE STUDENTS’ SKILL IN READING NARRATIVE TEXT BY USING KNOW-WANT-LEARNED STRATEGY AT THE EIGHT GRADE STUDENTS OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3 PALEMBANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v4i2.6272Keywords:
Reading Skill, Narrative Text, Know-Want-Learned StrategyAbstract
The aim of this research was to increase the students’ skill in reading narrative text by using Know-Want-Learned strategy at the eight grade students of Junior High School 3 Palembang. This research of this study was conducted by using classroom action research. The data used in this research are the result the pre-test to know the improvement of students in reading narrative text. The mean of the pre-test was 64,5. The mean of the first cycle was 84,85, it indicated that the scores and the mean in first cycle were better than the pre-test. The percentage of students who got point 75 or more there was also grew up. In the pre-test, there was 10 students (25%) who passed or got score up to 75. In the post-test of cycle I the students who got point 75 or more there was 40 (100%) and the increasing was about 75%. In other words, the students’ skill in reading narrative text improved and became well in the first meeting to the next meeting. For the hyphothesis testing used t-test formula from the compilation, it could be seen that coefficient of it could be seen that coefficient of tobserved (16,72) > ttable (0,316). Thus, alternative hyphothesis (Ha) could be received. Based on the research, It could be get that using Know-Want-Learned (KWL) Strategy could increase the students’ skill in reading narrative text.
References
Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Andrew, K, Shenton. (2004). Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects. Education for Information: Northumbria University.
Anne, Burns. (2010). Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching: a guide for practitioners. London & New York: Routledge.
Brown, H. D. (2004). Language Assessment: Principle and Classroom Practices.
New York: Longman, Pearson Education.
Brown, H.D. (2000). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (Fourth Edition) New York: Pearson Education.
Drajat, S Untung. accessed on Tuesday, 24th January 2017. Kerangka Pembelajaran.http://untungsdrajat.blogspot.com/2008/08/lampiran- kerangka-pembelajaran-abb.html).
Grabe, W And Stoller, F.L .2002. Teaching and Researching Reading ( First Edition).Edinburg : Person Educated Limited.
Kemmis, S & McTaggart, R. (1988). The Action Research Planner. Burns. Masganti. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Islam. Medan: IAIN PRESS. Nugrahani,Arifiyati. Fernando. 2006. Language To Use English. Jakarta: Piranti
Darma Kalokatama.
Jaya, A. Habibi, A. 2016. Fishbowl Technique and Learning Interest Effects on Speaking Achievement of SMK Sembawa. Jambi-English Language Teaching. 1(1)
Jaya, A. Hermansyah, Mortini, A. 2018. The Effect of Crawford Series Teaching (CST) on the Students’ Writing Achievement. ESTEEM: Journal of English Study Program. 1(1).
Nunan, David. (2013). Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McCraw Hill.
Ogle, D, M. (1986). K-W-L: A Teaching Model that Develops Active Reading of Expository Text, Readig Teacher. New York: The Guilford.
Peregoy, S & Boyle, O. (2001). Reading, Writing & Learning in ESL. New York: Addision Wesley Longman.
Pradiyono. (2007). Pasti Bisa! Teaching Genre-Based Wrtiting. Yogyakarta: Andi.
R, Jones. (2007). Strategies For Reading Comprehension. [on line]. Accessed on 03 January 2017, Tersedia: http: //www.readingquest.org/strat/kwl.html.
Ros, C and Vaughn, S. (2002) Strategies for Teaching Students with Learningand Behavior Problems. USA: Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
S. Y, & E. G, Guba. (1985), Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: CA Sage. Sanjaya, Wina. (2010). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada
Media Group.
Shakir, Muhammad Habib, The Qur’an Translation Muhammad Habib Shakir English Only (Tharike Tarsile Qur’an)
Singh, K Yogesh. (2006). Fundamental of Research Methodology and Statistics.
New Delhi: APH.
Travers, P, John. 1970. Fundamental of education psychology. Pensylvania: International Textbook Company.
Vault De Gigi . Establishing Trustworthiness, Accessed on Sunday, 15th January 2017. (Http://thebalance.com/establishing-trustworthiness-in-qualitative- research).
Willis. M. D, Judy. (2008). Teaching the Brain to read.Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Alexandria: Virginia USA.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
