APPLYING ENGAGING RESPONSE STRATEGY TO PROMOTE LITERARY APPRECIATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i1.7284Keywords:
the engaging response strategy, literary appreciation.Abstract
This paper reviews about the students’ response in literary appreciation of literature class. The problem of this study was “Is the engaging response strategy able to promote literary appreciation of the fifth semester students of English Education Study Program of Faculty of Teachers Training and Education   University of PGRI Palembang?† The objective of this study was to know or to identify the ability of the fifth semester students of English Education Study Program of Faculty of Teachers Training and Education University of PGRI Palembang in applying engaging response strategy to promote literary appreciation and, to identify the development of students’ literary appreciation. The method used in this study was pre-experimental.   From the calculation of t-test, it was found out that the value of t-obtained was 4.2. It is higher than t table (1.687). It means that null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. From the calculation, it was found out that there was a significant difference between the students who were taught by using engaging response strategy.
References
Beach, Richard, and Marshall. J. (1991). Teaching Literature in Secondary School. New York: Harcout Brace Javanovich, Inc.
Ningsih, Istin Selvia (2013). Applying Engaging Response Strategy to Promote Literary Appreciation. Palembang: PGRI University.
Langer, Judith A. (1991). Discussion as Exploration: Literature and the Horizons of Possibilities. In Center on English Learning and Achievement (CELA–Online). Available at http://cela.albany.edu/discussion/index.html (December 7, 2021)
Langer, Judith A. (1991b). Literary Understanding and Literature Instruction. In Center on English Learning and Achievement [CELA – Online]. Available at http://cela.albany.edu/discussion/index.html (December 7, 2021)
Langer, Judith A. (1997). Literacy Acquisition through Literature. In Center on English Learning and Achievement [CELA – Online]. Available at http://cela.albany.edu/acq/index.html (December 7, 2021)
Marshall, James. (2000). Research on Response Literature. In Handbook of Reading Research Volume III. Page 381-402. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Miall, David S. (1998). Empowering the Reader: Literary Learning and Classroom Learning. In Department of English, University of Alberta [Online]. Available at http://www.ualberta.ca/~dmiall/reading/EMPOWER.htm (December 7, 2021)
Miall, D. S., & Kuiken, D. (1994). Beyond text theory: Understanding literary response. Discourse Processes, 17, 337-352.
Morrow, Lesley M and Gambrell, Linda B. (2000). Literature. In Handbook of Reading Research Volume III. Page 563-586. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Purves, Alan C., Rogers, Theresa and Soter, Anna O. (1990). How Porcupines Make Love II: Teaching A Response-Centered Literature Curriculum. New York: Longman Group, Ltd.
Pikulski, John J and Cooper, David J. (1997). Literature-based Instruction. Houghton Mifflin Company [Online]. Available at http://www.eduplace.com/rdg/res/literacy/ (December 7, 2021)
Rudy, Rita Inderawati. (2008). The Application of Reader Response Approach toward Local Literature to Develop Students’ Critical Thinking and Cultural Awareness. Paper presented in the 6th Asia TEFL International Conference In Bali on August 3rd , 2008.
Zhen, C. (2012). Characteristics and Strategies of Literature Teaching in the EFL Context in China. International Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering, 5(3), 35- 43.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
