THE EFFECT OF QUESTION ANSWER RELATIONSHIP (QAR) STRATEGY ON STUDENTS' ACHIEVEMENT IN READING COMPREHENSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i1.7290Keywords:
QAR Strategy, Student Achievement, Reading ComprehensionAbstract
The focus of this research is to demonstrate the influence of question-and-answer learning on students' reading interest in narrative texts. Is there an effect of question answer relationship strategy on students' reading skills in reading narrative texts? Class Vlll SMP Methodist 9 Medan is the problem in this research. This form of research is a quasi-experimental study that includes an experimental and a control group, as well as pre- and post-tests. The post-test results showed that 22 pupils (88 percent) received very high scores and 3 students (12 percent) received high scores. The experimental group's mean score was likewise raised. Prior to using the QAR technique, the mean was 67.04. The mean after learning using the QAR technique was 83.36. The median in the pre-test was 76, but after learning with the QAR approach, it was 82. Prior to treatment, the experimental group's standard deviation was 1.676. After learning by applying QAR strategy, the standard deviation in the experimental group was 2.084. Students are more engaged in reading after employing the question-and-answer learning paradigm to improve their interest. This demonstrates that the question-and-answer interaction strategy's learning effect has a significant impact on students' success in reading narrative textsReferences
Ardiansyah, F. & Jaya, A. (2020). Extending the Students’ Narrative Text through Reading SMART Protocol. ESTEEM Journal of English Study Programme. Vol 3 (1) DOI. 10.31851/esteem.v3i1.4727.
Asura, C. N. (2018). The Effext Of Using Probing Prompting Method On Students' Critical Reading. Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara)
Boardman, A. G., Boelé, A. L., & Klingner, J. K. (2018). Strategy instruction shifts teacher and student interactions during textâ€based discussions. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(2), 175- 195.
Sholikah, M. (2019). The effectiveness of using pqrst (preview, question, read, state, test) strategy on the student’s reading comprehension ability of the first grade at MA Darul Huda Wonodadi Blitar.
Oktawati, H. (2021). The students'ability in writing descriptive paragraph at fourth semester english department of stkip ypm bangko academic year 2019/2020. Selecting, 3(3),
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions And Organizations: Ideas, Interests, And Identities. Sage publications.
Winasis, B. (2018). The Need For Video Learning To The Process Of Learning And Teaching At School. A content analysis on satirical news articles of the adobo chronicles from June 2013–Jun e, 172.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.