ENGLISH FOR MARINERS COURSEBOOK: HOW DOES READABILITY FORMULA RATE THE READABILITY LEVEL OF TEXTS?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i1.7303Keywords:
Coursebook, Readability formula, Readability levelAbstract
Readability level of marine texts do influences cadets’ ability in comprehending Maritime English reading materials. This research investigates the readability level of texts in English for Mariners, an English Maritime coursebook published by Language Competence Certification Tools for the Vocations (LCCTV) used for first-year cadets at West Sumatera Merchant Marine Polytechnic. To this end, 10 selected texts from 10 units were analysed. The Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease was utilized as readability formula to assess the readability level of texts. The findings revealed that 10% text was categorized as extremely difficult, 30% texts were difficult, 30% texts were fairly difficult, 10% text was average, 10% text was fairly easy, and 10% text was easy to read. Thus, English for mariners coursebook is readable for cadets even though few texts are too easy to comprehend.References
Baleghizadeh, S & Rahimi, E. (2011). Who is to Work with Whom when it Comes to Pair Work? A Learner’s perspective. Sino-US English Teaching, Vol 8 (6), 349-356
Begeny, J. C. & Greene, D. J. (2013). Can readability formulas be used to successfully gauge difficulty of reading materials? Reading in Schools, 00(00), 1- 18
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing Your Coursebook. Oxford: Maxmilland Education.
DuBay, William H. (2004). The Principles of Readability. Research Summary
Ewie, C., O. (2014). Readability of comprehension passages in junior high school (JHS) English textbooks in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Linguistics, 3, 35-68
Freahat, N., M. (2014). A comparison of reading levels of high school and freshmen university understudies in Jordan. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4, 2042-2050.
Hakim et al. (2021). Examining the Readability Level of Reading Texts in English Textbook for Indonesian Senior High School. Journal of English Language Studies, Vol 6 (1), 18-35
Halliwell, S. (1992). Teaching English in the Primary Classroom. London: Longman
Handayani, G M and Yanty Wirza. (2020). An Analysis of Language Content and Readability Level of Primary English Textbook. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol 546, 203-208
Husna. (2016). The correlation among readability level of texts, reading habit, and reading achievement of the eight grade understudies of MTs Al-Qur‘an Harsallakum Bengkulu. Journal of English Literacy Education, 3, 50-60
Hutchinson, T and Waters, A. (1987). English for Specific Purposes: A Learning – Centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Indrawati, D. (2012). An Analysis of the English Coursebook entitled Grow with English by Dr. Mukarto, M.Sc. Undergraduate Thesis, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
McNeil, John D. (1982). Reading Comprehension. USA: Scott, Foresman and Company
Manaadiar, Haries. (2019). Do you speak Maritime English? Retrieved from https://www.shippingandfreightresource.com/do-you-speak-maritime-english/ on August 2021
Maryansyah, Yupika. (2016). An Analysis of Readability of English Reading Texts for Grade IX Understudies at MTSN 2 Kota Bengkulu. Premise Journal, Vol 5 (1)
Sholihah, Indah Bilqis (2018) An analysis of readability level of reading texts in English Textbook entitled Bahasa Inggris for Senior High School Understudies Grade XII. Undergraduate thesis, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Spadaro, Daniel & Robinson, Lawrence & Smith, L. (1980). Assessing Readability of Patient Information Materials. American journal of hospital pharmacy. 37. 215-21. 10.1093/ajhp/37.2.215.
Srisunakrua, T & Chumworatayee, T. (2019). Readability of Reading Passages in English Textbooks and the Thai National English Test: A Comparative Study. Arab World English Journal, Vol 10 (2), 257-269
Yulianto, Y. (2019). An analysis on readability of English reading texts with automated computer tool. J-SHMIC: Journal of English for Academic, 6(1), 81-91
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.