THE CORRELATIONS BETWEEN LANGUANGE LEARNING STRATEGIES AND READING INTEREST TOWARDS STUDENTS’ READING ACHIEVEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i1.7501Keywords:
Languange Learning Strategies, Students’ ReadingAbstract
This study aimed at determining: (1) the correlations of language learning strategies; (2) the corelations  of reading interest; and (3) the correlations both language learning strategies and reading interest towards the students English study program at Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang. This study was a qualitative study using simple regression method. The respondents were 60 students at Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang. Data collection technique in this study were questioners and documentation. Validation test in this study were construct validity and content validity, while the reliability test was Cronbach’s Alpha. Normality test, homogeneity test, and linearity test had been conducted before data were analyzed using simple and multiple regression technique. The findings showed that (1) There is no significant correlations of language learning strategies on students’ reading achievement of English study program at Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang value of 0.582; (2) There is significant correlations of reading interest on students’ reading achievement of English study program at Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang value of 0.029; (3) There is no significant correlations of language learning strategies and reading interest simultaneously on students’ reading achievement of English study program at Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang value of 0.082. There is simultaneous influence between language learning strategies and reading interest with reading achievement.
References
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Chamot (2008). Using Diaries to Develop Language Learning Strategies. The Internet TESL Journal.
Crosby (2013). The Reliability Levels of the ELF Texts and the Reading Comprehension Level of the State High School Students’ in Palembang. LINGUA, 5(1), 43-69.
Desmarais (2018).†from surviving to thriving:four research-based principles to build students’ reading interest. The reading teacher vol. 71 no. 1 july/august 2017
Duke (1997).†Schema Theory and College English Reading Teaching.†English Language Teaching; Vol. 5, No. 11; 2012
Duke and Pearson.(2001). Reading Comprehension: Strategies That Work.
Fraenkel,Wallen & Hyun (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education.New York:MC Graw Hill.
Herlina. (2018).†indonesia pisa result and impact on the reading learning program in Indonesia. Advances in Social Science Education and Humanities Research, volume 297. 2018.
Jaya, A., & Marleni, M. (2018). Teaching Reading Procedure Text through Concept Oriented Reading Instruction (Cori) to the Tenth Grade Students of State Senior High School 13 Palembang. English Community Journal, 2(1), 158-166.
Miranda, (2011). Effort and Interest. Accessed from(http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/1964/effort.interest.html. On Wednesday, October 7th, 2020.)
Nurhayati (2008). Reading Interest and the Model of Learning: A Development Model of Interest, Knowledge, and the Model of Interest,Knowledge, and Strategy Use in Text Comprehension.Accessedfrom
Oxford, Rebecca L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: New Bury House.
Patel and Jain (2008 ).†Modeling an Expository Text Structure Strategy inThink Aloundsâ€.Reading Horizon:A Jurnal of Literacy and Language Arts,Vol 31 Issue November/December 1990.
Rachmawati, Dwita Laksmita. (2017). The Correlation Between Language Learning Strategieswith Students’ Proficiency. Vol (4). Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra.
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Penelitian:Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung:Alfabeta.
Sulaiman, MGS. (2017). Teach the Students Not The Books( A Handbook of TEFL). Palembang:Noerfikri Offest
Thomasr (2001). Helping Children Learn to Read. New York. Library of Congress Cataloging.
Yugafiati Rasi & Aseptiana Parmawati. (2017).†Using authentic material to improve students reading interest. ELTIN Journal, Vol 5/1, April 2017
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
