IMPROVING READING SKILL BY USING SKETCH TO STRETCH STRATEGY IN OFFLINE LEARNING AND CONVENTIONAL IN ONLINE LEARNING TO LITERAL READING SUBJECT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i1.7502Keywords:
Reading, Skretch to Stretch, Offline Learning, Online LearningAbstract
This study aims to find out: (1) Is there a significant difference in the Sketch to Stretch strategy in improving students' reading skills in offline learning?, (2) Does conventionally have a significant difference in improving students' reading skills through online learning? and (3) Is there any contribution to increasing students' reading ability by increasing motivation to learn offline and online learning?. To determine the effectiveness of the Sketch to Stretch strategy, researchers had taken two research samples. The first group was taught using the Sketch to Stretch strategy in offline learning and the second used conventional strategies in online learning. To collect data, both groups were given a speech test and a learning motivation questionnaire. The results showed that there was a significant difference in learning motivation in the reading ability of students of the 1A semester English study program after being taught using the Sketch to Stretch strategy. So it can be concluded that the Sketch to Stretch strategy learning has an effect on reading ability and increasing student learning motivation.
References
Blachowicz, Camille and Donna Ogle. 2008. Reading Strategies for Independent Learners. United States of America : The Guilford Press.
Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York, NY: Pearson Education.
Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for Campbell, D. T., & Julian, C. S. (1991). The experimental and quasi experimental designs for research on teaching. The English Teacher, 3(1), 34-37.
Catherine Snow, Reading for Understanding, (Pittsburgh: RAND Education, 2002), p.11
Department of Instructional Services. 2007. Reading Strategies For The Content Areas .August 2, 2007, p. 78
Douglas Brown, Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practies, (New York : Longman, 2004),p. 206.
Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://www.suarantb.com/sekolah-siasati-kekurangan-pembelajaran-secara-tatap-muka/
https://blog.kejarcita.id/ini-10-alasan-pentingnya-sekolah-tatap-muka-menurut-guru/.
Jaya, A., & Marleni, M. (2018). Teaching Reading Procedure Text through Concept Oriented Reading Instruction (Cori) to the Tenth Grade Students of State Senior High School 13 Palembang. English Community Journal, 2(1), 158-166.
Judy Tilton Brunner, I don’t Get It! Helping Students Understand What They Read,(United States of America : Rowman&Littlefield Education, 2011), p. 86-87
McMillan, J.H., & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education: evidence-based inquiry, 2(2). New York, NY: Pearson.
Nanda Wahyuni, The Effect Of Using Sketch To Stretch Strategy Towards Readingin Narrative Text of The Second Year Students at MAN 2 Model Pekanbaru, Thesis, UIN SUSKA RIAU, Faculty of Education and Teacher Training State Islamic University of Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau Pekanbaru.
Nunan, David.2003. Practical English Language Teaching, New York: McGraw Hill.P.68
Pakhare, Jayashree. 2011. Effective Reading: Reading Comprehension Strategies, Retrived on July, 2011, http://www.buzzle.com/articles/effective-teaching-reading-comprehension- strategies.html.
Richards, C. J., & Rodgers, T.S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Setiawati, Mariana. Nurfaraditha, Iin. dkk. Perbandingan Metode Pembelajaran E-learning Dan Tradisional.(Program Studi Sistem Infomrasi, Fakultas Ilmu Komputer, Universitas Gunadarma).Unpublished. Depok Media.
Soekartawi. 2007. Merancang dan menyelenggarakan E-learning. Yogyakarta: Ardana Membaca Bahasa Inggris ( Studi Eksperimen pada SMK Negeri 3
Sumarmi, Made Ayu. 2010. Pengaruh E-Learning Dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Kemampuan Tabanan).Unpublished. Tabanan.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
