THE INFLUENCE OF USING COMICS STRIPS IN TELLING STORIES AND STUDENTS’ LEARNING MOTIVATION TOWARD THE READING ABILITY OF THE EIGHTH GRADE STUDENTS AT SMPI MARYAM MURAIT MARTAPURA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i2.8539Keywords:
Reading, Motivation, Comics Strip, Story TellingAbstract
The objective of this study is to find out whether or not there is any significant effect on the eight grade students’ learning motivation toward the reading ability after being taught by using comics strips. The population of this study was the eight grade students at SMPI Maryam MuraitMartapura in academic 2021/2022. The total number of the population was 142 students, The sample was consisted of 36 students of R1 and 36 students of R2. The method of the study was the experimental method and the data were collected through written test in multiple choice form. The test was administrated twice as the pre-test and post-test. The result were analyzed by using t-test. The students’ Mean score of pretest and post-test in control class of R1 were 46.11 and 6,67. While the students’ Mean score of Pretest and post test in experimental class of R2 were 46,67 and 5,56. The null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted.
References
Adams, H. (2014). Children’s literature, in J. Fellowes & G. Oakley (Eds.) Language, literacy and early childhood education, 2nd Edition. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
Alderson, J.C. (2001),Assessing reading, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An interactive Approach To language Pedagogy. New York: Longman.
Bruner, J. S. (1986, 2009). Actual minds, possible worlds. Harvard University Press.
Comics in the Classroom. http://www.teachingscomics.org/curriculum/chronicle.php
[accessed 01/30/12]
Csabay, Noemi. Using Comic Strips In Language Classes, English Teaching Forum
Journal Gene Yang, Comics In Education.
Creswell, J. (2012). Education Research Planning Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4thEdition).United States of America:PearsonEducation,Inc
Cohen, et al (2005,p.212) Research Methodology
Definition of Comics http://dictionary.laborlawtalk.com/Comics [accessed 10/11/11]
Disney, Walt. 2004. The Very Best of Donald Duck Comics (Bilingual Edition) 17th Edition. Jakarta: M&C PT. Gramedia. Experimental Research Designs http://www.dictionary.laborlawtalk.com/ experimental _techniques [accessed 06/11/2012]
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to desIgn and evaluate research IneducatIon (8th ed.). New York: McGrawHIll.
Jaya, A., Mortini A., (2021). Visual Scaffolding and Intensive Reading Strategies Based on Gender. Esteem Journal.
Simaibang, Baginda. (2017). English Language Teaching in a Foreign
Sofyan, S., Failisnur, F., 2016.English journalThe Application of Using comics strips in Teaching reading
Simaibang, Baginda. (2017). English Language Teaching CH2.in a Foreign Situation. Palembang: CV Citrabooks Indonesia
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
