THE INFLUENCE OF EXTENSIVE READING STRATEGY AND READING INTEREST TOWARD STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF ELEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMAN 1 TULUNG SELAPAN.

Authors

  • Nabilah Natasya SMAN 1 Tulung Selapan
  • Tahrun Tahrun Universitas PGRI Palembang
  • Hanni Yukamana Universitas PGRI Palembang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i2.8540

Keywords:

Reading Comprehension, Extensive Reading.

Abstract

The objectives of the study are to find out whether or not(1) There is  significant influence of extensive reading towards students’ reading comprehension between those who have height reading interest and those who have low reading interest at the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Tulung Selapan (2) There is significant influence of conventional reading strategy toward the eleventh grade students’ reading comprehension between who those have high reading interest and those who have low reading interest at the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Tulung Selapan. (3) There is significant influence of extensive reading strategy and conventional reading strategy towards the eleventh grade students’ reading comprehension between  those who have high reading interest and those who have low reading interest at the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Tulung Selapan.(4) There is significant interaction effect of extensive reading strategy and reading interest on students’ reading comprehension at the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Tulung Selapan. This study used Saphiro-Wilk test and it used Levene's test in testing the homogenity. It was found that the significance value for homogeneity test (Levene’s test) was 0.021 which is lower than 0.05, therefore the data was not considered homogeny, so the writers took the equal variances not assumed on t-test. Next, the significance value  for t-test was 0.000. It showed that there was a significant difference of extensive reading strategy and no treatment reading strategy on the eleventh grade students’ reading comprehension who have low reading interest because the sig. value  was lower than 0.05. That means the null hypothesis (Ho3b) is rejected.

References

Barkley, E. F., Cross, K. P. & Major, C. H. Collaborative Learning Techniques: A Handbook for Collage Faculty. San Fransisco : Jossey-Bass, 2005.
Colgan, Mark. Ten Cooperative Learning Techniques for Building Classroom, 2010.
Communities. 2010 AMATYC Conference Taylor University Upland, IN. (Accessed on 20 May, 2017)
David, Crystal. 2008. A Dictionary of Linguistic and Phonetic.USA: Blackwell Publising
Fokeye, 2016. Structure as A Determinant of Senior Secondary School Students’ Achievement in English Narrative Text in Ido Local Government Area, Oyo State. International Journal of Arts and Humanities (IJAH) Bahir Dar- Ethiopia Vol. 5(2), S/No 17, April, 2016:270-283 (Online). http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ijah.v5i2.22 (Accessed on 25 May 2017)
Jaya, A., Mortini A., (2021). Visual Scaffolding and Intensive Reading Strategies Based on Gender. Esteem Journal.
Hyland, K. Second Language Writing. NewYork: Cambridge University, 2004.

Lou,Leaver. Round table on language and Linguistics. Georgetown University Press. 2005.
Sugiono. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: ALFABETA, 2016.
Wardiman, Artono, et.al. “English in focus, for Grade VII Junior High School (SMP/Mts)”, Jakarta: Pusat Pembukaan, Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2008).
Yassen, Wafa. Cooperative Learning in the EFL Classroom. The WEI International. Academic Conference Proceedings: Vienna Austria, 2014.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-10