THE INFLUENCE OF USING CUE CARDS IN THE PEER GROUP ACTIVITIES AND LEARNING MOTIVATION TOWARDS SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXTS AT JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL 3 PALEMBANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i2.8541Keywords:
Cue Cards, learning motivation, reading comprehensionAbstract
The main objective of this study to find out whether or not there was any significant effect on the eight grade students’ learning motivation toward the reading ability after being taught by using cue card. the population of this study was the eight grade students at Junior High School Palembangin academic 2021/2022. The total number of the population was 150 students, The sample consisted of 30 students of R1 and 30 students of R2. The method of the study was the experimental method and the data were collected through written test in multiple choice form. The test was administrated twice as the pre-test and post-test. The result were analyzed by using t-test. The students’ Mean score of pretest and post-test in control class of R1 were 53,13 and 73,30. While the students’ Mean score of Pretest and post test in experimental class of R2 were 47,50 and 66,33. The null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted.
References
Arkadani, M.P and LAshkarizzn.( 2015). Using Mapping Strategy to Improve Reading Comprehension Ability to Intemediate Student.Yazd Islamic.Azad University, Volume 36. Mei 2015, PP 1076-1094.
Arikunto, S. (1993).ProsedurPenelitian. Jakarta :RinekaCipta
Arikunto, S. (1994).ProsedurPenelitian. Jakarta :RinekaCipta
Arikunto, S. (2010).ProsedurPenelitian. Jakarta :RinekaCipta
Arikunto, S. (2013).ProsedurPenelitian. Jakarta :RinekaCipta
Brown, H Douglas.( 2001). Language Assesment : Principles and Classroom Practices. New York : Longman
Brown, H Doughlas. (2004). Language Assesment : Principles and Classroom Practices. New York : Longman
Cherry, Kendra. Reviewed by David Susman, Ph.D. The Internet Accessed from https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-self-esteem-2795868. On Tuesday, 29, June, 2021.
Chia, H L. (2001). Reading Activities for Effective Top-down Processing. English Teaching Forum.39 (1) : 22-24
Cresswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design. United Kingdom: SAGE Publications.
Celce-M.M.(2001).Teaching English as Second or Foreign Language,Third Edition. Boston:ThomsonLearning,Inc.
Creswell, J. (2012). Education Research Planning Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research(4thEdition).United States ofAmerica:PearsonEducation,Inc.
oestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education:Revisited once again.Review of Educational Research,7(1),1-27.
Depoy.E &Gitlin. L. N. (2011). Introduction to Research, Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies. (5thEdition)United State of America:ElsivierInch.
Efendi, Yusuf. (2003). The effectiveness of mind mapping strategy in increasing the second year students reading comprehension at SLTP N Graduate Program, PGRI University of Palembang.
Field,A.(2009).DiscoveringStatisticsUsingSPSS:ThirdEdition.London.SAGEPublicationsLtd
F.,Wallen, N.E.,&Hyun,H.H.(2012).How to DesignandEvaluate Research in Education 8thEdition.NewYork:McGraw-Hill.
Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N.E., Hyun, H. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. SF: San Fransisco State University.
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N.E., Hyun, H. H (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies
Gambrell,L.B.,&Marinak,B.A.(2008).Intrinsic Motivation and Rewards:What Sustains Young Children‟s Engagement with Text?. Literacy Research andInstruction,47,9-26.
Grant,&Osanloo. (2014). Theorical and Conceptual Framework :Mandatory Ingredients of A Quality Research.
Guthrie,J.T.,Wigfield,A.,&VonSecker,C.(2000).Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology,92(2),331-341.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N. M., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., &Barbosa, P. (2006).Influences of Stimulating Tasks on Reading Motivation and Comprehension.The Journal of Educational Research,99,232-245.
Hajar,Ibnu.2011.Hypno teaching: MemaksimalkanHasil Proses BelajarMengajardenganHypnoterapi. Yogyakarta :DivaPress.
Hahn, Cora. (1996). The Dialoguing Jigsaw Game. Accessed from http://oxfordjournals.org/reprint/xxxv/3/240/pdf.on Friday, 2, July, 2021.
Harsiadi, Haris. (2010). The Influence of SQ4R Method and LANGUAGE Learning Strategy Toward the Students Reading Comprehension at the Eleventh Grade Students of Madrasah Aliyah YPMP Palembang. An unpublished Post Graduated Theses. Palembang: University of PGRI Palembang.
Hatch, Evelyn and HosseinFarhady.(1982). Research Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics.Cambridge: Newbury House Publisher.
Jaya, A., Mortini A., (2021). Visual Scaffolding and Intensive Reading Strategies Based on Gender. Esteem Journal
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
