THE INFLUENCE OF HYPNOTEACHING STRATEGY AND READING MOTIVATION TOWARD STUDENTS’ READING ABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i2.8545Keywords:
Hypnoteaching Strategy, Reading Motivation and Ability.Abstract
This study concerned with the influence of hypnoteaching strategy and reading motivation towards students’ reading ability. This study applied 2x2 (two by two) factorial design method. The sample was 60 students that divided into two groups. There were 30 students as experimental group and 30 students as control group. The data were collected by using a questionnaire and written test with multiple choice questions that analyzed by using t-test and two-ways Anova. The findings showed that (1) there was significant different in reading ability between the students who had high reading motivation and low reading motivation taught by using hypnoteaching strategy and no experimental treatment (2) there are interaction effects of hypnoteaching strategy and no experimental treatment, and (3) hypnoteaching strategy can be utilized to promote and contributes the reading ability of the students. It could be concluded that hypnoteaching strategy and reading motivation showed significant role to improve students’ reading ability on narrative text.
References
Creswell, J. (2012). Education Research Planning Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4^th Edition).
Field, A . (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS: Third Edition. London. SAGE Publications Ltd
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education 8th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Johnson, A. P. (2008). Teaching Reading and Writing: A Guide for Tutoring and Remediting Students. New York: Rowman and Littlefield Education.
Lismalinda., & Moriyanti. (2019). The Influence of Hypnoteaching Method on Students’ Reading Motivation and Achievement in Secondary School. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Vol. 4(1).
McCormick, Keith and Jesus, Salcedo. (2015). SPSS for Dummies. New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
McMillan, J.H and Schumacher S. (2010). Research in Education: Evidence Based Inquiry. New jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. (2010). Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics Fourth Edition . London: Pearson Education Limited.
Salami. (2017). Hypnotic Teacher dan Hypnoteaching. Vol. 3(1).
Zuhri & Sukarnianti (2015). Using Hypnoteaching Strategy to Improve Students’ Writing Ability. Dinamika Ilmu . Vol. 15(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
