USING MIXIDEA ONLINE DEBATING STRATEGY TO PROMOTE THE STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i2.8591Keywords:
Mixidea Online Debating Strategy, Speaking AbilityAbstract
The problem of the study was there any significant difference between the Tenth Grade students of SMA Dharma Bhakti Palembang who were taught trough Mixidea Online Debating Strategy and those who were not. Therefore, the objective of the study was to find out whether or not there is any significant different scores between Tenth Grade students of SMA Dharma Bhakti Palembang who are taught through Mixidea Online Debating Strategy and those who are not. Quasi Experimental research design was applied in this study. The population of this study was 68 of Tenth Grade students of SMA Dharma Bhakti Palembang. The sample was selected by using purposive sampling method non-random sampling. Oral test was used as technique in collecting the data and they were analyzed by using independent sample t-test. From this study, the writer found out that Mixidea Online Debating Strategy was effective to be taught to the Tenth Grade Students of Dharma Bhakti Palembang. It could be seen from the result of t-obtain (22.585) was higher that t-table (4.290) where 34 students based on the table stated. Besides the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and alternative hypothesis was accepted.References
Cook, V. (2013). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. Routledge.
Hamruni. 2009. Strategidan Model-Model Pembelajaran Aktif Menyenangkan. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Tarbiyah UIN Sunan Kalijaga. Harmer, J. (1998). How to teach English. Essex, England: Longman.
Hermansyah. (2021). Self Talk Strategy in Improving the Eleventh Grade Students’ Speaking Ability. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 02.
Jaya, A., Mortini A., (2019). Visual Scaffolding and Intensive Reading Strategies Based on Gender. Esteem Journal English Study Programme.
Jaya, Aswadi. (2016). Fishbowl Technique and Learning Interest Effects on Speaking Achievement of SMK Sembawa. Journal of Education 2015.
Jaya., Hermansyah & Rosmiyati. (2019). The Implementation of Project Based-Learning in Increasing Speaking Achievement and Self-Confidence. Indonesian Educational Administration and Leadership Journal.1(1),
4-14.
Kayi H. (2006). Teaching Speaking: Activities to Promote Speaking in a Second Language. The Internet TESL Journal.XII(11), 1-4. Retrieved from. http://unr.edu/homepage/hayriyek.
Krieyen, Daniel. (2007). Teaching Debate to ESL Stud ents: a six- class unit. http:///iteslj.org/Techniques/Krieger-Debate.html. Accessed on Januari 25th.
Oduke, O. (2014). Learning French oral skills using role play as a learning strategy: The kenyan experience. Anchor Academic Publishing (aap_verlag).
Silberman, L., Melvin. (2009). Active Learning. Bandung: Nusamedia.
Yulian, Heru. “Tutorial Menggunakan MixIdea, Platform Debat Online Dengan Fitur Terlengkap.†Coretan Karsa. October 18, 2020. (https://coretankarsa.wordpress.com/2020/10/18/tutorial-menggunakan-mixidea-debat-online/)Accessed on Feb 05, 2021.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.