INTEGRATED CURRICULUM USED IN LEARNING ENGLISH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v5i2.8592Keywords:
Students Perception, Cambridge CurriculumAbstract
In Indonesia, curriculum changes continue to occur because they are deemed not in accordance with expectations, so some schools apply the international curriculum. The Cambridge curriculum focuses on students' understanding, knowledge and critical thinking skills. This study aims to determine students' perceptions toward Cambridge curriculum used in learning English at Senior High School Sumsel, because students are the subject of implementing the curriculum. To find out the perceptions of students, researchers first studied how schools implemented the curriculum and the data analysis methods used were triangulation techniques, interviews to find out how the curriculum was implemented, questionnaires to determine student perceptions and documentation to support research results. The results of this study are (1) positive student perceptions. Positive things are shown by some students who are enthusiastic in learning to use the Cambridge curriculum and make students have a global prespective, (2) the implementation of the Cambridge curriculum in South Sumatra is quite good because schools continue to map the national curriculum and Cambridge curriculum and to material that is not the same will be made into additional class.References
Jaya, Aswadi. (2016). Fishbowl Technique and Learning Interest Effects on Speaking Achievement of SMK Sembawa. Journal of Education 2015.
Jaya., Hermansyah & Rosmiyati. (2019). The Implementation of Project Based-Learning in Increasing Speaking Achievement and Self-Confidence. Indonesian Educational Administration and Leadership Journal.1(1),
4-14.
Park, C. (2003). Engaging Students in The Learning Process. The Learning Journal, Lancaste University.
Sanjaya, W. (2008). Perencanaan dan Desain Sistem Pembelajaran . Jakarta: Kencana.
Simaibang, B. (2017). English Languange Teaching. (D, Kusnadi, Penyunt.). Palembang Citra Book Indonesia.
Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian Proses Belajar Mengajar . Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Yamin, M. (2013). Strategi dan Metode dalam Model pembelajaran. Jakarta: GP Press Group.
Yamin, M. (2013). Strategi dan Metode dalam Model pembelajaran. Jakarta: GP Press Group.
Yani, A. (2014). Mindset Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Alfabeta
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
