EFL UNIVERSITY STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF USING GOOGLE TRANSLATE TO UNDERSTAND ENGLISH TEXTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31851/bbsh2z23Keywords:
Google Translate, EFL Students, Students Perceptions, Reading Comprehension, Translation ToolAbstract
This study investigates university-level EFL students’ perceptions of using Google Translate to facilitate comprehension of advanced English texts. It explores how final-year students conceptualize the tool’s cognitive role in reading, the frequency and academic contexts of its use, and the pedagogical benefits and linguistic challenges associated with machine-assisted text interpretation. Employing a descriptive qualitative design, data were collected through an open-ended questionnaire distributed via Google Forms to 32 seventh-semester undergraduate EFL students. The responses were systematically analyzed using the qualitative analysis framework of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings indicate that students perceive Google Translate as a supportive tool that reduces reading anxiety and accelerates lexical recognition. However, the study also reveals a cognitive paradox in which the convenience of the tool may foster psychological dependency. In addition, literal word-for-word translations and limited contextual sensitivity often lead to semantic confusion when students engage with complex academic texts. The study offers practical implications for EFL pedagogy, curriculum design, and digital literacy by emphasizing the importance of balancing machine-assisted translation with autonomous, critical, and independent reading practices.
References
Abdalhussein, H. F. (2021). Relationship between gender difference and students' perceptions of Google Translate use and accuracy along with difficulties. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(5), 2155–2166. https://doi.org/10.48047/rigeo.11.05.120
Abdelhalim, S. M., Alsahil, A. A., & Alsuhaibani, Z. A. (2025). Artificial intelligence tools and literary translation: A comparative investigation of ChatGPT and Google Translate from novice and advanced EFL student translators' perspectives. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 15(1), Article 2508031. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2508031
Alhaisoni, E., & Alhaysony, M. (2017). An investigation of Saudi EFL university students' attitudes towards the use of Google Translate. International Journal of English Language Education, 5(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v5i1.10696
Alim, S., Aisyah, S., Sabat, Y., Hastuti, U. N., & Andayani, A. (2025). Gamified vocabulary learning: EFL students' perceptions of using Duolingo to enhance English vocabulary mastery. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i4.1256
Ammade, S., Ramadhani, M. F., & Rahman, A. W. (2023). Google Translate as English learning tool assistance for non-English department students: Students' perception. Klasikal: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 5.
Arif, T. A. (2023). The effect of the Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) method assisted by visual media on the writing skills of Class V students. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 23(2), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v23i2.59200
Charles Perfetti. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Darzhinova, L. (2025). Technology-enhanced scenario-based reading assessment of pre-service English teachers (1st ed.). Routledge.
Fadilah, I. A., Jaya, A., & Uzer, Y. (2023). Visual representation and comprehension: The exploration of multimodal text to energize reading of the tenth-grade students at State Vocational High School 5 of Palembang. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 6(1), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v6i1.10226
Imaroh, I., Aisyah, S., & Prasetyo, Y. (2026). The strategies used by EFL students to learn new vocabulary. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 7(2), 137–152.
Karnal, A. R. (2013). Reading comprehension and the use of Google Translator. International Journal of English Linguistics, 3(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v3n6p113
Khasanah, U., Madjdi, A. H., & Nuraeningsih, N. (2022). Students' perception on the use of Google Translate in learning pronunciation. Borneo Educational Journal, 4(1), 50–60. https://doi.org/10.24903/bej.v4i1.912
Khotimah, K., Wahyudin, W., Rohbiah, T. S., Islam, U., Sultan, N., & Hasanuddin Banten, M. (2021). Students' perception of Google Translate in online English learning. Journal of English Language Teaching Studies, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.48181/jelts.v4i2.12016
Maryamah, S. E., Wati, S., & Suharto, P. P. (2024). Analyzing higher order thinking skills in reading exercises of Indonesian EFL textbook. SALEE: Study of Applied Linguistics and English Education. https://doi.org/10.35961/salee.v5i2.927
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Mohinur, A. (2024). Project-based learning as a creative and innovative way of teaching English as a foreign language. University Research Base, 54–60.
Mulyani, M., & Afina, F. (2021). The students' attitude towards Google Translate. The Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(1).
Nayeem, M. A., Alim, A., & Roshid, M. M. (2025). Learning language beyond the classroom: Reading English newspapers in university dormitories and developing English language skills. MEXTESOL Journal, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v49n1-5
Nygård, A. (2024). Testing teachers' abilities to distinguish between translations produced by students, Google Translate and ChatGPT (Master's thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology). https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3148912
Pham, A. T., Nguyen, Y. N. N., Tran, L. T., Huynh, K. D., Le, N. T. K., & Huynh, P. T. (2022). University students' perceptions on the use of Google Translate: Problems and solutions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 17(4), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v17i04.28179
Puripunyavanich, M. (2025). Exploring the reading instruction in foundation English courses for EFL non-English major undergraduates. REFLections, 32(1), 156–198. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v32i1.279255
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2021). Perilaku organisasi. Widina Bhakti Persada.
Sagita, M., & Balqis, N. (2021). Students' perception about Google Translation tool in learning English: A descriptive study at Jabal Ghafur University. Getsempena English Education Journal, 8(1), 26–39.
Sari, D. M. M., & Wardhani, A. K. (2020). Critical thinking as learning and innovation skill in the 21st century. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 3(2), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.36597/jelp.v3i2.8778
Setiawan, A., & Axelina, M. (2022). The English students' perception in using Google Translate and U-Dictionary at translation class. International Social Sciences and Humanities, 2(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.32528/issh.v2i1.120
Siahaan, D. G., Aprianti, I., Hariati, P., & Purba, W. A. (2023). Students' perception about Google Translate as media for translating English descriptive text. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistics.
Smith, B., Jiang, X., & Peters, R. (2024). The effectiveness of Duolingo in developing receptive and productive language knowledge and proficiency. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1–26.
Utami, I. A., Sunardi, & Drajati, N. A. (2024). English reading e-module based on gamification and contextual teaching and learning to promote reading comprehension skills. Journal of Education Technology, 8(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v8i1.74569
Xianli, Y. (2024). A study on the application of CBI teaching mode in college English reading course for media majors: A case study of college English reading teaching for students in Sichuan University of Media and Communications. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 7(4), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2024.7.4.12
Young, A. E. (2024, February 14). Machine translation use in the English as a Foreign Language (EFL) classroom. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall2023.2023.16862
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Imada Ulinnuha, Siti Aisyah, Lailatul Musyarofah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
In order to assure the highest standards for published articles, a peer review policy is applied. In pursue of the compliance with academic standards, all parties involved in the publishing process (the authors, the editors and the editorial board and the reviewers) agree to meet the responsibilities stated below in accordance to the Journal publication ethics and malpractice statement.
Duties of Authors:
- The author(s) warrant that the submitted article is an original work, which has not been previously published, and that they have obtained an agreement from any co-author(s) prior to the manuscript’s submission;
- The author(s) should not submit articles describing essentially the same research to more than one journal;
- The authors(s) make certain that the manuscript meets the terms of the Manuscript Submission Guideline regarding appropriate academic citation and that no copyright infringement occurs;
- The authors(s) should inform the editors about any conflict of interests and report any errors they subsequently, discover in their manuscript.
Duties of Editors and the Editorial Board:
- The editors, together with the editorial board, are responsible for deciding upon the publication or rejection of the submitted manuscripts based only on their originality, significance, and relevance to the domains of the journal;
- The editors evaluate the manuscripts compliance with academic criteria, the domains of the journal and the guidelines;
- The editors must at all times respect the confidentiality of any information pertaining to the submitted manuscripts;
- The editors assign the review of each manuscript to two reviewers chosen according to their domains of expertise. The editors must take into account any conflict of interest reported by the authors and the reviewers.
- The editors must ensure that the comments and recommendations of the reviewers are sent to the author(s) in due time and that the manuscripts are returned to the editors, who take the final decision to publish them or not.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
